SV1000 or FZ1 or something else?

SV1000 or FZ1 or something else?

Author
Discussion

Janosh

Original Poster:

1,740 posts

169 months

Tuesday 7th June 2016
quotequote all
Howdy BB gang, after a 3 year break I think I'm going to buy another bike...

To give you an idea of bikes I've previously owned: CBR600, R1, Bandit 1200, Hornet 900, Z1000.

The Z1000 was my favourite all rounder, great for days out, comfortable enough 2up and could handle the odd track day.

My next bike will be used for 80% commuting, 10% with a pillion and then the odd track day.

The 2 that have caught my eye are the SV1000 (never owned a twin) and the FZ1 (similar to the Z1000 which I loved)....

I imagine that the SV would need rear sets to enable decent cornering angles, but there appear to be loads to aftermarket parts for the SVs so that should be a problem.

The FZ1 is obviously a newer design and clearly has much better suspension etc, so I imagine that any advice on here would suggest that there's no competition between these two.

Anything else I should look at around £3.5k?

One thing that I've not yet looked in to is insurance: I guess my NCB has lapsed so will I get screwed on the premiums?

Janosh

Original Poster:

1,740 posts

169 months

Tuesday 7th June 2016
quotequote all
Perhaps I should also look at the Sprint ST??

I hate the ergonomics of the Daytona, but the triple is a lovely engine format...

luckystrike

536 posts

183 months

Tuesday 7th June 2016
quotequote all
I'd have the SV1000 but that's purely for the noise and styling. No experience of one but it doesn't look like the biggest or thickest pillion pad.

MotorsportTom

3,322 posts

163 months

Tuesday 7th June 2016
quotequote all
SV1000's are meant to have pretty piss poor fuel range.

I've ridden an older Fazer and it was a great bike for doing everything, 2 guys at work have them and have done big tours 2-up to trackdays.

Plus they wheelie really well biggrin

scorcher

3,989 posts

236 months

Tuesday 7th June 2016
quotequote all
I had a sv for a few months. Wouldnt recommend one myself. Engine not particularly nice for a v twin. KTM V twins way superior. Although the sv is probably fairly old tech now. Cramped if you're fairly tall too. Ideal if you're only five feet tall.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

257 months

Tuesday 7th June 2016
quotequote all
Janosh said:
The 2 that have caught my eye are the SV1000 (never owned a twin) and the FZ1 (similar to the Z1000 which I loved)....
The answer is Aprilia RSV.

the_lone_wolf

2,622 posts

188 months

Tuesday 7th June 2016
quotequote all
KTM Superduke

Yes, it'll do 80 miles to a tank

No, your pillions won;t be comfortable

But if you ride one, you'll know why I suggest it...

wink

Janosh

Original Poster:

1,740 posts

169 months

Tuesday 7th June 2016
quotequote all
Thanks for the feedback and additional suggestions... I think the FZ1N is my first port of call, seems to tick all my boxes so just need to check the ergonomics and insurance.

I'm a little surprised that there's no love for the Sprint ST...?

darkyoung1000

2,060 posts

198 months

Tuesday 7th June 2016
quotequote all
I can only comment on the SV1000 but the tank range is about 120-150 miles, the pillion pad is ok for occasional use like the 10% you suggest (2 up York to Southampton wasn't luxury, but wasn't crippling).
The motor is older tech and needs an aftermarket set of cans and a power commander to get the best out of it (including increasing the fuel range).
They are however cheap and fun to ride (and if you're interested in a K7 Classic for cheap, get in touch smile ).
Cheers,
Tom

Janosh

Original Poster:

1,740 posts

169 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
You have PM Tom

mcdonaa

48 posts

125 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
I had an ST1050 for two years. Was a great do it all bike. Great midrange power makes riding it fast very easy (I.e. better than revving the nuts off an inline 4) Standard exhaust is waaay too quiet, so I fitted a mid pipe back system. You will probably need a remap if you do this...but can all be done at home with the tu eecu software.

Suspension is fine as standard, but lots upgrade the rear shock... especially for touring with a pillion and extra weight.

Very reliable, only the usual regulator problems that many manufacturers have. Also the sprag clutch if your battery is knackered due to low turnover when starting.

Other than that, the engine and box are bullet proof...the whole bike feels very well engineered.

I would get another (newer) one tomorrow

Shadow R1

3,800 posts

178 months

Wednesday 8th June 2016
quotequote all
My brother owned an SV1000S for years putting 20,000 miles on it.
Keep in mind even the newest example will be getting on now.

His had the m4 system, pipercross airbox, power commander, ohlins shock and ohlins fork springs, barrat clutch plates.
With that it made 110 at the wheel.
It wore out rear tyres but taking into account the weight of the machine and the torque, not surprising really.
That was on pilot road's what ever the latest version was at the time.
Fuel range was the same as the R1 and R6, he could do 4 days commute needing to fill up on the 4th day coming back.
We have a power commander for the r6, so i think that will get better after its mapped.

It weighted 230kg with a full tank.
R1 on the same scales was 195kg full tank.

You could feel that riding it, however a mate had a sprint 1050 for a while, it felt much lighter than that, to the point that after going on the SV back to back down the same road as the sprint it got part ex'ed for a 675.

Engine in the sprint was good, even from very low down.

The sv will do fine for what you want, with the right parts fitted.
The sprint find a good example as the one i rode was poor with high miles, give it a test ride and if you like it game on.


Janosh

Original Poster:

1,740 posts

169 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
Quick update on my browsing progress and I can't ignore the R1 5PW. I've also got some insurance quotes which have come out surprisingly reasonable smile

I know it's perhaps not the perfect commuter tool, but having owned an original R1 back in the day, I'd love to own another albeit slightly newer one and I always thought the 5PW was a particularly well executed model. Are the ergonomics much different to the original one? My 4XV was one of the most confortable bikes that I've owned.

Going back a couple of years, I read OCD's thread (on here) where he ran one for a daily commute and I remember it fairing very well.

I've pretty well talked myself into a 5PW so now just need to find the right bike...

SteelerSE

1,898 posts

158 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
I hope you have an understanding pillion...

Janosh

Original Poster:

1,740 posts

169 months

Friday 10th June 2016
quotequote all
SteelerSE said:
I hope you have an understanding pillion...
She did a good few miles on the 4XV and I've probably over egged the 10% of pillion riding, likely to be much less thumbup