mk2 Golf- VR6 Conversion
Discussion
jakesmith said:
If you havent started yet, I'd suggest the 1.8t ebgine instead, much more economical and powerful plus lighter.
Only advantage of the 6 is noise.
Its about the noise for me.Only advantage of the 6 is noise.
I've a VR6 engined Caddy Van and the noise that thing makes when its on song is amazing.
No four pot is going to give you that.
daemon said:
jakesmith said:
If you havent started yet, I'd suggest the 1.8t ebgine instead, much more economical and powerful plus lighter.
Only advantage of the 6 is noise.
Its about the noise for me.Only advantage of the 6 is noise.
I've a VR6 engined Caddy Van and the noise that thing makes when its on song is amazing.
No four pot is going to give you that.
JB! said:
daemon said:
jakesmith said:
If you havent started yet, I'd suggest the 1.8t ebgine instead, much more economical and powerful plus lighter.
Only advantage of the 6 is noise.
Its about the noise for me.Only advantage of the 6 is noise.
I've a VR6 engined Caddy Van and the noise that thing makes when its on song is amazing.
No four pot is going to give you that.
From memory VR6s were 0-60 in around 7.3 seconds. This is smaller and lighter than a Golf mk3, so maybe high sixes off the line.
Not that i bought it for outright performance anyway. Thats not why you would fit a VR6.
Edited by daemon on Friday 24th April 13:19
Gassing Station | Audi, Seat, Skoda & VW | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff