Mondeo TDCI Flywheel

Author
Discussion

Transmitter Man

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

225 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2013
quotequote all
Too many threads on the web so I thought I'd ask the PH brain trust as I frequent this board more than any other.

With brand names like Valeo & LUK offering single plate flywheel conversions should I worry about any imbalance in the crank assembly if I decide to go this route in place of the standard DMF?

Phil

HustleRussell

24,733 posts

161 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2013
quotequote all
There is a thread literally a few lines under yours on exactly the same subject;

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

It's a subject which divides opinion for sure...

Transmitter Man

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

225 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2013
quotequote all
Hi James,

Thank you for that.

Phil

packman10_4

245 posts

195 months

Thursday 3rd January 2013
quotequote all
Dont do it , in so cases the nose of the crank snaps off due to the wrong harmonics at various
engine speeds.

Ive just done my 2003 Passat 130 Tdi and yes i used a LUK kit , that was near on £400 to me trade !!!

Enginostics

9 posts

136 months

Monday 7th January 2013
quotequote all
I am new to the forum but not new to the world of automotive engineering. I have worked up to the level of RND, design & manufacturing and automotive electronics & software. The point I am making, if an engine is designed, manufactured and tested with a dual mass flywheel, you should NEVER use a single mass flywheel as a replacement. I could go into the mathematics side of things and bore you to death so just take my word for it.

Transmitter Man

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

225 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
Have had Ford DMF and clutch and starter replaced so now all as new for hopefully many more miles of reliable motoring.

Tnx

Phil

Kidders

1,060 posts

164 months

Thursday 10th January 2013
quotequote all
Valeo was fitted to earlier models, then LUK, the LUK ones suffered less failure reports.

one eyed mick

1,189 posts

162 months

Thursday 10th January 2013
quotequote all
Iwould have thought that the dmf was designed to be used with the engine not the other way round ,like many modern developments it has not turned out to be the cure all that people think ,expensive and in terms of life limited aswell as being a pain in the a-se but I'm old school and will be probably told I don't understand !

porka911t

67 posts

206 months

Wednesday 16th January 2013
quotequote all
Imagine how much money Ford spent on R&D on the 2.4 common rail Transit engine, They now do solid clutch and fly wheel mod to replace the dual mass set up.

Nick1point9

3,917 posts

181 months

Wednesday 16th January 2013
quotequote all
packman10_4 said:
Dont do it , in so cases the nose of the crank snaps off due to the wrong harmonics at various
engine speeds.

Ive just done my 2003 Passat 130 Tdi and yes i used a LUK kit , that was near on £400 to me trade !!!
You do know that engine was designed to run a solid flywheel?