Cam timing & Emissions

Cam timing & Emissions

Author
Discussion

Glade

Original Poster:

4,271 posts

224 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
My westy has a Toyota 4AGE running on Dellorto 45's.
Has a 290 duration cam (Kent Cams T1604) which, I think, is reasonably agressive?
Vernier pulleys, but no markings on them.

Last MOT the garage wound back the idle mixture and it scraped through emissions.

This time they've been wound back and it still won't pass.

Mecahnic thinks cambelt is a bit slack (stretched? Not tight enough?) and he needs to re-time the cams.
Another symptom he mentioned is that the compression is "a bit low" accross the board.
He thinks the exhaust cam is a bit retarded.
(Sound, knowledgeable bloke he's not messing me about or anything)

I think that there may also be a slight leak on the exhaust manifold... could affect CO & Hyrdrocarbons?

Just interested in hearing soem wisdom on the science of cam timing & emissions...
Cheers

theshrew

6,008 posts

185 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
Doubt the exhaust leak will affect it thats a MOT failure anyway.

If your belt if stretched it will affect the emmisions etc.

stevieturbo

17,276 posts

248 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
All that typing...and you never even stated the emissions levels it failed on.

An exhaust leak will very much affect emissions, so much so that if there is an exhaust leak, the test should not be conducted. At least that's what happens here, unless it was a very very minor leak.

Cam timing will affect emissions, as will plenty of other things. But until it's known the emissions levels are known, impossible to suggest a remedy

Glade

Original Poster:

4,271 posts

224 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
stevieturbo said:
All that typing...and you never even stated the emissions levels it failed on.

An exhaust leak will very much affect emissions, so much so that if there is an exhaust leak, the test should not be conducted. At least that's what happens here, unless it was a very very minor leak.

Cam timing will affect emissions, as will plenty of other things. But until it's known the emissions levels are known, impossible to suggest a remedy
Yeah, I don't know the actual results, was a 2 min phone convo this morning.

I think if there is an exhaust leak it is minor, and might not even exist. I mentioned it because during MOT prep I had noticed that bit of soot had been blowing out of the exhaust manifold. I replaced the gasket and used some manifold sealant just in case, so it might not even be relevant. I'm sure he would have picked that up if it was a problem!

So a mildy retarded exhaust cam... theoretically this can affect emissions because?


theshrew

6,008 posts

185 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
If the timing is out it wont be running as well as it could even though it still will run. Even if its 0.5 deg out it will make a difference.

Glade

Original Poster:

4,271 posts

224 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
Its interesting! This car taught me about carbs, and now cams & timing.

Its one of the few things I haven't attempted myself... cambelt & timing etc...
Looks straightforward, but the consequences of getting it wrong are quite severe!

I was going to get the cambelt done in the next few months anyway, so hopefully this will fix the emissions and it will actually be running better than it has while I've had the car!

Dan67

69 posts

171 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
nah its not that bad just turn it over by hand a few times to make sure nothing hits and make sure all the marks are lined up. Job done

PaulKemp

979 posts

146 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
Compression will be lower due to the long cam duration
More overlap less dynamic compression
You may be able to reduce overlap by retiming the cams, ultimately if you run higher duration cams you need to increase compression ratio to compensate
Skim head or block or thinner gasket

stevieturbo

17,276 posts

248 months

Monday 22nd April 2013
quotequote all
theshrew said:
If the timing is out it wont be running as well as it could even though it still will run. Even if its 0.5 deg out it will make a difference.
1/2 degree out from what ?

I defy anyone to actually measure the difference in emissions from a 1/2 degree change in cam timing.

Glade

Original Poster:

4,271 posts

224 months

Tuesday 23rd April 2013
quotequote all
CO 8.88 vs 3.5
HC 5496 vs <1200

on fast idle test.

Exhaust gets very hot very fast, chap thinks that either ignition or valve timing is too retarded.

Think I'm going to poull it back somewhere where they can adjust carbs, ignition map and cam timing all together on an RR, and ask them to find me a nice place between emissions and performance.

Pumaracing

2,089 posts

208 months

Tuesday 23rd April 2013
quotequote all
Glade said:
CO 8.88 vs 3.5
HC 5496 vs <1200

on fast idle test.

Exhaust gets very hot very fast, chap thinks that either ignition or valve timing is too retarded.

Think I'm going to poull it back somewhere where they can adjust carbs, ignition map and cam timing all together on an RR, and ask them to find me a nice place between emissions and performance.
I've built race engines with 300+ degree cams that managed to get idle HC readings of 200 or so and normal CO ones so your cam duration is not the issue if everything mechanical is in good order. Your massive HC readings show huge amounts of fuel not getting burned so a compression test is the first port of call to make sure no valves are bent or severe bore wear and then do cam and ignition timing checks if comp readings are even across the board.

stevieturbo

17,276 posts

248 months

Tuesday 23rd April 2013
quotequote all
I dont think Ive ever seen a hydrocarbon reading that high !!! You must be dumping raw fuel out the exhaust ! lol

Glade

Original Poster:

4,271 posts

224 months

Tuesday 23rd April 2013
quotequote all
I found out those test results were from the first MOT test as was, without any setup. So being so high might not be so crazy.
I had the carbs stripped and re-built over winter, then just put them on and it ran - obviously very rich.
He didn't seem to have results after any adjustment, only that it still failed when he backed them right off.

He said compression is even across all cylinders and doesn't think there is any valve damage.

stevieturbo

17,276 posts

248 months

Wednesday 24th April 2013
quotequote all
CO being that high perhaps not totally crazy.
But hydrocarbons....very crazy.

Glade

Original Poster:

4,271 posts

224 months

Wednesday 24th April 2013
quotequote all
Looks like i'm putting it into raw engineering/striker cars who fitted the cams and ecu many years ago.

They sound very knowledgable...

Just got to arrange transport, so expect an update in 3 months!

AER

1,142 posts

271 months

Wednesday 24th April 2013
quotequote all
Glade said:
CO 8.88 vs 3.5
HC 5496 vs <1200

on fast idle test.
It's just running really rich. Zilch to do with cam timing or ignition, albeit they will have a small effect. Your carbs need some further attention.

Are they properly balanced? One cylinder not out to lunch or something?

Sardonicus

18,969 posts

222 months

Thursday 25th April 2013
quotequote all
AER said:
It's just running really rich. Zilch to do with cam timing or ignition, albeit they will have a small effect. Your carbs need some further attention.

Are they properly balanced? One cylinder not out to lunch or something?
Spot on, may be a float height issue, if the mixture screws are not leaning your idle out, wind the mixture screws in clockwise gently to the stop then wind them back out 2 full turns, this is def fuel related.

Glade

Original Poster:

4,271 posts

224 months

Monday 3rd June 2013
quotequote all
Car is in with someone who knows what they are doing.

Cambelt changed, and cams re-timed.

Carbs weren't balanced. Only drawing through one carb at idle.

Fuel pressure too high making it difficult to start because too much fuel.

Had it on a gas analyser and the HC's are really good for an engine with those cams and CO is OK too...

Hopefully have the car back by the weekend!

Sardonicus

18,969 posts

222 months

Monday 3rd June 2013
quotequote all
Glade said:
Car is in with someone who knows what they are doing.

Cambelt changed, and cams re-timed.

Carbs weren't balanced. Only drawing through one carb at idle.

Fuel pressure too high making it difficult to start because too much fuel.

Had it on a gas analyser and the HC's are really good for an engine with those cams and CO is OK too...

Hopefully have the car back by the weekend!
Enjoy driving sweet engines Jap Twin Cams biggrin