Brundle Jargon (No race info posted here)

Brundle Jargon (No race info posted here)

Author
Discussion

Ferg

Original Poster:

15,242 posts

258 months

Sunday 20th March 2005
quotequote all
If that tt says:
"In the zone" or,
"Hooked up"
..in the next race I'm turning the Fng sound down.

D_Mike

5,301 posts

241 months

Sunday 20th March 2005
quotequote all
He is much more interesting than any of the others, most of whom haven't a clue whats going on and are very very inane. How would you prefer him to describe people who are "hooked up" (that's probably the sort of terminology I'd use).

gtr-gaz

5,094 posts

247 months

Sunday 20th March 2005
quotequote all
I agree with D Mike on this.

He is about the only one on there apart from Blundell who knows whats going on during the race.

The team radio idea is interesting too. Thank goodness Brundle can translate that into something I can understand.

Can you imagine Murray Walker (bless him) trying to understand what the teams were talking about on their radios?
He would not have a clue.



Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Sunday 20th March 2005
quotequote all
I like Brundle, a lot - but I do think he should ease up on some of the trendy jargon that seems to have started emerging this year. He didn't always talk like that. I think ITV encourage Brundle and Allen to use this racing "slang" to keep the "yoof" audience interested.

Hilts

4,392 posts

283 months

Sunday 20th March 2005
quotequote all
Personally I can't stand Brundle, granted he may know what he's talking about but his droning voice just irritates me. It was tolerable when he was paired with Murray, less so with James Allen.

ITV should have drafted in Mark Cole, Eurosport's DTM guy, he also does the F1 for Asia I think. He's my kind of guy. Blundell is also miles better than Brundle to listen to.

D_Mike

5,301 posts

241 months

Sunday 20th March 2005
quotequote all
Blundell better than Brundle!?! He can barely string a sentence together. He may know what he's talking about (so does Brundle, who was also the better driver) but he's not articulate enough in my opinion. He doesn't enunciate clearly either.

neil purdie

56 posts

242 months

Sunday 20th March 2005
quotequote all
D_Mike said:
Blundell better than Brundle!?! He can barely string a sentence together. He may know what he's talking about (so does Brundle, who was also the better driver) but he's not articulate enough in my opinion. He doesn't enunciate clearly either.


Yes that's fine if you can put up with his constant pinkie playing...... Come on, Brundle is very informative. If you think back to Mr Walker..... Think!!! dont get me wrong... I liked his flare, but for info, you can't beat Brundle.

Who would you rather listen too??

2 Smokin Barrels

30,261 posts

236 months

Sunday 20th March 2005
quotequote all
To keep up chat for 100 minutes plus is tricky. I think he does well, you have to allow him the odd Blundler!

neil purdie

56 posts

242 months

Sunday 20th March 2005
quotequote all
2 Smokin Barrels said:
To keep up chat for 100 minutes plus is tricky. I think he does well, you have to allow him the odd Blundler!


My point exactly.... Think of Mr. Walker and blunders in the same sentence!!

Hilts

4,392 posts

283 months

Sunday 20th March 2005
quotequote all
D_Mike said:
Blundell better than Brundle!?! He can barely string a sentence together. He may know what he's talking about (so does Brundle, who was also the better driver) but he's not articulate enough in my opinion. He doesn't enunciate clearly either.


Well I said he was better to listen to, not necessarily better. Articulation and enunciation are frankly the last things on my mind watching a Grand Prix, after all Murray gave us some fantastic quips such as 'I've just stopped my startwatch' Legend.

Eric Mc

122,053 posts

266 months

Sunday 20th March 2005
quotequote all
Walker certainly could articulate - and ennunciate, even if he was talking rubbish. Blundell does annoy me when he does a hatchet job on perceived correct grammar....but his points are usually valid once you ger past the mangled prose.

tuffer

8,850 posts

268 months

Sunday 20th March 2005
quotequote all
I preffered it when I liven in Germany, just turned the volume off and made my own commentary! You can usualy spot a puncture, off, personality etc about 30 seconds before the pro's anyway.

Frik

13,542 posts

244 months

Sunday 20th March 2005
quotequote all
Martin Brundle has my utmost respect.

Firstly, to sit in front of a screen and talk almost continuously for that long without seriously repeating yourself is impressive.

Second, he has a fantastic way of explaining some of the more technical aspects that I, as someone who knows a reasonable amount about the topic, don't find patronising.

He is always calm, patient and uninterested in hyperbole (unlike a certain other commentator that sits not too far from him). He may have a "boring" tone of voice but he says some bloody interesting things with it. I can't think of another single person who could carry out his pit walks so efficiently.

Can anyone confirm (as I may just be blocking out what James Allen says) that ITV's current line-up seem to share airtime 50/50? Surely it is more customary in these situations to have the loud one doing all the commentating and the "expert" feeding in the occasional titbit? If this is the case then they're extremely lucky to have him!