Scooby 2.5 conversion?

Scooby 2.5 conversion?

Author
Discussion

smifffy

Original Poster:

1,992 posts

267 months

Wednesday 31st August 2005
quotequote all
Had an interesting chat with the chaps down at Gatwick Subaru last week about various engine upgrade options, one of which is replacing the 2 litre lump with the North American 2.5 block.

350 bhp & 350 ft/lb torque sound lovely to me. I've always been against modding as I have a nice warranty to protect, but this might be tempting for early next year.

They also do an upgraded turbo for about half the price.

The question is... is this just the short end of the wedge. And will I have any wedge left at the end of this? :D

Has anyone had any experience of these upgrades? There are lots of people on scoobynet & P1 owners club who talk about it, but no-one I've found yet who has done it?

Cheers.

rustybin

1,769 posts

239 months

Wednesday 31st August 2005
quotequote all
Thought about this myself (secret plan for when the MAF fails and Mrs Rusty can be convinced a new engine is necessary) but the costs do seem to build quite exponentially as you've obviously read on scoobynet.

Original clutch only good for around 250lb/ft. so another £300 for an upgrade.
Gearbox only good for 350lb/ft so fit the six speed for £1500
2.5 Engine internals not great above around 350bhp so need new pistons and rods. and a turbo and and and

Probably cheaper to go to Litchfield and buy it new with the work done and a warranty.

andy mac

73,668 posts

256 months

Wednesday 31st August 2005
quotequote all
the 2.5 here is 300 bhp for the sti version. Not 350? Are they going to doa bit of tuning to get it up to that?

JonRB

74,615 posts

273 months

Wednesday 31st August 2005
quotequote all
Isn't this what the Litchfield Type 25 is? An STi Type C (I seem to remember) with a 350bhp+ 2.5L engine and bags more torque than the 2.0

(Yes, it is 350-odd - they do some tuning and remapping on it)

Edit: Damn - Litchfield have already been mentioned. And there was me thinking I was going to impress someone with my knowledge of Scoobies.

>> Edited by JonRB on Wednesday 31st August 21:02

Mr E

21,634 posts

260 months

Thursday 1st September 2005
quotequote all
JonRB said:
Isn't this what the Litchfield Type 25 is? An STi Type C (I seem to remember) with a 350bhp+ 2.5L engine and bags more torque than the 2.0


Yup.

Cracking car, but rather expensive.

Nicol@

3,850 posts

237 months

Thursday 1st September 2005
quotequote all
You shoud have gone to the powerstation/litchfield open day last weekend.

vixpy1

42,625 posts

265 months

Thursday 1st September 2005
quotequote all
The guy who looks after mine is doing two or three at the mo, they are good but i would'nt use them for more than 350bhp.

I'd go down the 2.2 or 2.3 route, I've seen some crackers.

dnb

3,330 posts

243 months

Thursday 1st September 2005
quotequote all
The 2.5 all sounds nice on paper...
But it's awfully expensive to get it RIGHT. There's lots of little problems along the way that you don't hear about until they bite.

IMHO, you'd do better £ for £ tuning a 2.0 if your project fund is less than about 4k. The std 2.0 internals will take a fair amount of punishment provided the mapper knows what he's about. (I've mapped an old WRX to make 1.5 bar reliably before now - it's still going too )

My STi 5 RA is faster to 100 than our Griff 500 (It runs out of puff beyond that...) and only mildly modified (ECUTek 3, panel filter and full H&S exhaust) at that. (<£1k's worth at new prices.)

That said, the extra torque of the 2.5 is very nice to have... You don't have to rev like mad to get anywhere.



smifffy

Original Poster:

1,992 posts

267 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
Hmm, not sure what the likely fund will be but probably a combined package of 5-10k but would also like to get some suspension mods too and upgrade the driver a bit.

My only real worry about seriously upgrading the 2 litre lump is serious lag to get the power gains. The added torque of the 2.5 comes with fewer minuses?

2.2 or 2.3? I haven't heard about those.... tell me more!



andy mac

73,668 posts

256 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
You can get stroker kits, that increase the capacity...

The DJ 27

2,666 posts

254 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
I've seen Scooby 2.5 conversions with well over 500bhp. Of course this involves basically rebuilding the engine from a bare block (pistons, rods, crank, cams, turbo, etc etc etc) and costs about £23,000. I beleive Graham Goode Racing have a fair bit of experience with 2.5 conversions

m12_nathan

5,138 posts

260 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
Mr E said:

JonRB said:
Isn't this what the Litchfield Type 25 is? An STi Type C (I seem to remember) with a 350bhp+ 2.5L engine and bags more torque than the 2.0



Yup.

Cracking car, but rather expensive.


It is a bloody bargain given the performance. £34k, which is about what your car cost 10 years ago isn't it?

smifffy

Original Poster:

1,992 posts

267 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
Very true - it's a fantastic car. My only beef with the latest generation of Imprezas (aside from the type C import) is that they're all getting a little porky.

The P1 is the lightest of the lot (AFAIK) and hence part of my interest in improving what I have rather than buying a new one (quite apart from the fact that I'm buying a new flat too).

stroker kits aren't so interesting - part of the attraction of the 2.0 is that it's tried and tested, as is the 2.5

I guess I'll just need to have a chat with Graham Goode or Roger Clarke before taking the plunge. I've no intention of going down the forged internals route - that's getting into silly money, but 350 lbs of torque has to be the target (currently 260).

vixpy1

42,625 posts

265 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
I can have a 2.5 put together with 450bhp for about 6 or 7K

Problem with the 2.5 is the block walls are thin and they tend to give way.

smifffy

Original Poster:

1,992 posts

267 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
So a 2.0 block is better?

How come the Litchfield blocks are ok?

Cheers

vixpy1

42,625 posts

265 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
Because it only becomes a problem over about 450-500bhp

The ideal block is the 2.2 ,as it is or bored to 2.3..

Your talking 700bhp with the right bits

vixpy1

42,625 posts

265 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
If you need an engine building properly.. and i mean, real attention to detail, a guy who i know builds engines and is very very good

dnb

3,330 posts

243 months

Wednesday 28th September 2005
quotequote all
Have a look on bbs.22b.com some time... Andy Forrest and Paul Blamire have both achieved some very impressive results lately. Not sure what engines they're using, but I suspect not the 2.5 block - as Vixpy says, it's a bit thin on walls.

Mr E

21,634 posts

260 months

Thursday 29th September 2005
quotequote all
m12_nathan said:

Mr E said:

Cracking car, but rather expensive.


It is a bloody bargain given the performance. £34k, which is about what your car cost 10 years ago isn't it?


Good point. Well made.

The Four was frighteningly expensive 10-12 years ago. Probably why you don't see too many.

_Al_

5,577 posts

259 months

Thursday 29th September 2005
quotequote all
Which implies that the Litchfield will be something of a bargin in the future...

I like this line of reasoning!