M5 Forum

Author
Discussion

Patrick1964

Original Poster:

698 posts

232 months

Thursday 17th April 2008
quotequote all
Can anyone point me in the direction of a good M5 forum ? I'm thinking about buying an E39...

dazren

22,612 posts

262 months

Thursday 17th April 2008
quotequote all
The best M5 technical forum is:

www.m5board.com

BTW, good choice.......

stringbag

291 posts

251 months

Thursday 17th April 2008
quotequote all
Yup, good choice!

yankcrime

69 posts

201 months

Friday 18th April 2008
quotequote all
I'd recommend mtorque.co.uk also.

nordeschleife

7 posts

193 months

Monday 28th April 2008
quotequote all
If you do buy an E39 - and I highly recommend it - then make sure you get the face-lifted version post Sept 2000. It has an updated engine which doesn't appear to suffer from the vanos issues and certainly doesn't chew through as much oil either.
It is not uncommon for early E39s to require an extra litre of oil every 1000 miles, but mine requires a modest top up (1/4 litre) every 2500 miles - and I use it pretty hard.
It is worth spending an extra £1k - 2k to get the best car you can as you will save money in long term.

Jim Green

449 posts

210 months

Tuesday 29th April 2008
quotequote all
Not being rude, but if your advising prospective purchasers of the M5......Please be accurate with the information.

Any E39 M5 with a build date (Shown on the VIN Plate under the bonnet) of 03/2000 and above has an engine fitted with the revised piston ring design. Go for the best car....not the newest.


Neil.D

2,878 posts

207 months

Tuesday 29th April 2008
quotequote all
Indeed - Sept '00 was the visual facelift of angel eyes and wide screen TV and different steering wheel.

tobybmw535i

289 posts

193 months

Tuesday 29th April 2008
quotequote all
definatley go for the e39 m5 you wont regret it. it is the best car ever but like the other say get a facelifted model as you do get the better satnav and steering wheel also it is worth looking at getting one with the heritage leather it is a good option and i think it realy adds something to the car

Baddie

617 posts

218 months

Tuesday 29th April 2008
quotequote all
At the risk of throwing cats amongst pidgeons - the E34 M5 is a more stimulating car, noisy enough at idle to rattle house windows and doors (but still refined when you're in it), less isolation from the road (though no worse for road noise), mechanical rose-jointed as opposed to electronic throttle, no traction control (which you don't need because the chassis is so benign it makes you feel like Schuey). The E34 also seems to ride a little softer, as it is further away from the era of the ultimate NS lap time. Lap time may be a bigger priority for you than for me, as I'm a country-road driver and can't afford to thrash my cars on track. Predictability is therefore a priority for me.

Having said that the E39 is safer, quieter, smoother, more confortable, more automated (lights/wipers/parking sensors etc), and less aurally obtrusive. It's a more modern car, and is also quicker still - very much so at low revs. The E34 requires more effort to go quickly - which is no bad thing really.

I've just sold an E39 530i Sport (255 rear tyres) that could corner quicker than the E34 M5 (my second) I've replaced it with. The 530 was quicker round bends, and had a more consistent power delivery, but was dull unless you were driving fit to have an accident when it became a very impressive car. Except in the wet when the detachment from the road, the electronic throttle, the DSC could not match the predictability of the E34 with its LSD, mechanical throttle, and oh-so-relaxed chassis. I could have had a significant accident in the E39 in a low-grip situation I felt the E34 would have told me about before things got messy. Overall I feel safer AND more thrilled in the E34 M5 - so where's the downside?? (I'll tell you - the odd breakdown!!)

Having said all this I will say if you've set your heart on the E39 - do it! You won't regret any M5 ownership if you go into it with your pockets open, and all the cars are phenomenal machines on a different level from any other 5 series, and probably any other saloon car. The Audi RS4 scores well largely because of the novelty value of anything getting close to Bimmer's absolute finest.

If you are not definitely set on an E39, just get someone to let you sample the S38 climb it's rev range in a tunnel.......

Edited by Baddie on Tuesday 29th April 23:19

Baddie

617 posts

218 months

Tuesday 29th April 2008
quotequote all
PS m5board is very very impressive as a body of knowledge. If only the dealers knew as much...

Neil.D

2,878 posts

207 months

Wednesday 30th April 2008
quotequote all
Nice write up baddie.
I think Patrick has more than enough to deliberate now.

Neil

Edited by Neil.D on Wednesday 30th April 19:38

gavm5

186 posts

207 months

Thursday 1st May 2008
quotequote all
Baddie said:
At the risk of throwing cats amongst pidgeons - the E34 M5 is a more stimulating car, noisy enough at idle to rattle house windows and doors (but still refined when you're in it), less isolation from the road (though no worse for road noise), mechanical rose-jointed as opposed to electronic throttle, no traction control (which you don't need because the chassis is so benign it makes you feel like Schuey). The E34 also seems to ride a little softer, as it is further away from the era of the ultimate NS lap time. Lap time may be a bigger priority for you than for me, as I'm a country-road driver and can't afford to thrash my cars on track. Predictability is therefore a priority for me.

Having said that the E39 is safer, quieter, smoother, more confortable, more automated (lights/wipers/parking sensors etc), and less aurally obtrusive. It's a more modern car, and is also quicker still - very much so at low revs. The E34 requires more effort to go quickly - which is no bad thing really.

I've just sold an E39 530i Sport (255 rear tyres) that could corner quicker than the E34 M5 (my second) I've replaced it with. The 530 was quicker round bends, and had a more consistent power delivery, but was dull unless you were driving fit to have an accident when it became a very impressive car. Except in the wet when the detachment from the road, the electronic throttle, the DSC could not match the predictability of the E34 with its LSD, mechanical throttle, and oh-so-relaxed chassis. I could have had a significant accident in the E39 in a low-grip situation I felt the E34 would have told me about before things got messy. Overall I feel safer AND more thrilled in the E34 M5 - so where's the downside?? (I'll tell you - the odd breakdown!!)

Having said all this I will say if you've set your heart on the E39 - do it! You won't regret any M5 ownership if you go into it with your pockets open, and all the cars are phenomenal machines on a different level from any other 5 series, and probably any other saloon car. The Audi RS4 scores well largely because of the novelty value of anything getting close to Bimmer's absolute finest.

If you are not definitely set on an E39, just get someone to let you sample the S38 climb it's rev range in a tunnel.......

Edited by Baddie on Tuesday 29th April 23:19
For me total opposite I am afraid -
I have owned both an early (1990) 3.6 litre e34 ///M5 and also a later (1995) 3.8 litre sixspeed big brake Limited Edition e34 ///M5.
I now have an e39 ///M5 (facelift) and can honestly say that (personally speaking) it is the fastest, safest and most entertaining out of the three !
The low down torque is awesome, it pulls in ANY of the six gears at ANY revs whereas the big sixes lacked torque- even the 3.8 in comparison sometimes left me a few car lentghs down out of an island to a modest family hatch if the right gear was not selected.
Everything feels so right in the e39 ///M5, the way the car rocks to the big V8 on start up, that V8 burble at idle, the redline lower down when cold so as not to over rev until fluids warmed, precise switch gear, firm yet comfortable suspension communicating with you, and I have still to mention the sport button, endless pull throughout the rev range, better fuel economy, cheaper services, no nightmares on edc failure as per e34 3.8's.
Dont get me wrong I have enjoyed every ///M5 I have been fortunate to own but for me, 400bhp V8 e39 ///M5 is the one to have "ultimate driving machine" it is just so right !

D_T_W

2,502 posts

216 months

Thursday 1st May 2008
quotequote all
gavm5 said:
Baddie said:
At the risk of throwing cats amongst pidgeons - the E34 M5 is a more stimulating car, noisy enough at idle to rattle house windows and doors (but still refined when you're in it), less isolation from the road (though no worse for road noise), mechanical rose-jointed as opposed to electronic throttle, no traction control (which you don't need because the chassis is so benign it makes you feel like Schuey). The E34 also seems to ride a little softer, as it is further away from the era of the ultimate NS lap time. Lap time may be a bigger priority for you than for me, as I'm a country-road driver and can't afford to thrash my cars on track. Predictability is therefore a priority for me.

Having said that the E39 is safer, quieter, smoother, more confortable, more automated (lights/wipers/parking sensors etc), and less aurally obtrusive. It's a more modern car, and is also quicker still - very much so at low revs. The E34 requires more effort to go quickly - which is no bad thing really.

I've just sold an E39 530i Sport (255 rear tyres) that could corner quicker than the E34 M5 (my second) I've replaced it with. The 530 was quicker round bends, and had a more consistent power delivery, but was dull unless you were driving fit to have an accident when it became a very impressive car. Except in the wet when the detachment from the road, the electronic throttle, the DSC could not match the predictability of the E34 with its LSD, mechanical throttle, and oh-so-relaxed chassis. I could have had a significant accident in the E39 in a low-grip situation I felt the E34 would have told me about before things got messy. Overall I feel safer AND more thrilled in the E34 M5 - so where's the downside?? (I'll tell you - the odd breakdown!!)

Having said all this I will say if you've set your heart on the E39 - do it! You won't regret any M5 ownership if you go into it with your pockets open, and all the cars are phenomenal machines on a different level from any other 5 series, and probably any other saloon car. The Audi RS4 scores well largely because of the novelty value of anything getting close to Bimmer's absolute finest.

If you are not definitely set on an E39, just get someone to let you sample the S38 climb it's rev range in a tunnel.......

Edited by Baddie on Tuesday 29th April 23:19
For me total opposite I am afraid -
I have owned both an early (1990) 3.6 litre e34 ///M5 and also a later (1995) 3.8 litre sixspeed big brake Limited Edition e34 ///M5.
I now have an e39 ///M5 (facelift) and can honestly say that (personally speaking) it is the fastest, safest and most entertaining out of the three !
The low down torque is awesome, it pulls in ANY of the six gears at ANY revs whereas the big sixes lacked torque- even the 3.8 in comparison sometimes left me a few car lentghs down out of an island to a modest family hatch if the right gear was not selected.
Everything feels so right in the e39 ///M5, the way the car rocks to the big V8 on start up, that V8 burble at idle, the redline lower down when cold so as not to over rev until fluids warmed, precise switch gear, firm yet comfortable suspension communicating with you, and I have still to mention the sport button, endless pull throughout the rev range, better fuel economy, cheaper services, no nightmares on edc failure as per e34 3.8's.
Dont get me wrong I have enjoyed every ///M5 I have been fortunate to own but for me, 400bhp V8 e39 ///M5 is the one to have "ultimate driving machine" it is just so right !
Just to throw the cat amonst the pigeons, i side with baddie on this one. Whilst the E39 is undoubtedly a marvel to drive and be in, i always saw the E34 as being its slightly harsher bigger brother. It needs to be worked to get the best from it, but the thrill and challenge of driving it quickly is something that i have always enjoyed. The complete lack of electronic interferance only adds to the enjoyment factor IMO. Mine sounds utterly fabulous when revved, with far more character than the V8 in the E39. You have to drive the E34, where as the E39 lacks that little bit of extra feedback that you get from its older sibling.
I'm not meaning this to sound like i'm having a go, as everybody has different opinions, but the electronic gimmicks on the E39 i always thought let it down. I don't need to be told not to rev it hard when cold, mine has the most fantastic burble at idle, the switch gear and feedback are the best out of any car i've driven, and the running costs, whilst expensive, pale in comparison to what it can cost to run an E39.
I have so far spent in the region of £8000 to get mine almost mechanically perfect, and as with all cars you can get good ones and bad ones. I bought mine with the knowledge i would need to spend a good amount of money on it. It after all is 13 years old and has 100k on the clock. Tales of wallet wilting £20k running costs/warrenty issues over 3 years for the E39 are enough to make even an E34 3.8 owner cry.
At the end of the day it is down to personal opinion, and thankfully every still has theirs. I will always side with the E34, but then again i'm rather biased as i adore mine and can't think of anything i could replace it with. The best suggestion i can come up with is to drive a good example of both and then decide, after all it's you cash you'll be spending!!

BOR

4,705 posts

256 months

Friday 2nd May 2008
quotequote all
D_T_W said:
Tales of wallet wilting £20k running costs/warrenty issues over 3 years for the E39...
DT, is THAT really true, or internet myth ?

D_T_W

2,502 posts

216 months

Friday 2nd May 2008
quotequote all
BOR said:
D_T_W said:
Tales of wallet wilting £20k running costs/warrenty issues over 3 years for the E39...
DT, is THAT really true, or internet myth ?
If you dig about on the M5board, theres a couple of posts about woeful reliabilty, with warrenty issues keeping the car off the road for lenghty periods of time. It's never anything major either, it's niggling issues that affect the car as a whole. But i do recall a thread about a guy who (fortunately) had taken out the BMW warranty, and the total bill buy the time he sold the car was over £20k worth of work that had been done. Mine is expensive, that's frankly fking ridiculous

Boulder

167 posts

204 months

Friday 2nd May 2008
quotequote all
Its E39 for me,spend a few thou miles driving one and you'll discover why.


Ashok

599 posts

260 months

Friday 2nd May 2008
quotequote all
I had over £30k of warranty work on my E60 including two complete gearboxes party

Boulder

167 posts

204 months

Friday 2nd May 2008
quotequote all
Ashok said:
I had over £30k of warranty work on my E60 including two complete gearboxes party
30K in warranty work,oh dear sorry to hear of that.An E60 with no warranty might not be a good proposition by the sounds of it,
In 3 years i have probably spent 3k on the E39,cheap to run really.

Baddie

617 posts

218 months

Sunday 4th May 2008
quotequote all
D_T_W said:
gavm5 said:
Baddie said:
At the risk of throwing cats amongst pidgeons - the E34 M5 is a more stimulating car, noisy enough at idle to rattle house windows and doors (but still refined when you're in it), less isolation from the road (though no worse for road noise), mechanical rose-jointed as opposed to electronic throttle, no traction control (which you don't need because the chassis is so benign it makes you feel like Schuey). The E34 also seems to ride a little softer, as it is further away from the era of the ultimate NS lap time. Lap time may be a bigger priority for you than for me, as I'm a country-road driver and can't afford to thrash my cars on track. Predictability is therefore a priority for me.

Having said that the E39 is safer, quieter, smoother, more confortable, more automated (lights/wipers/parking sensors etc), and less aurally obtrusive. It's a more modern car, and is also quicker still - very much so at low revs. The E34 requires more effort to go quickly - which is no bad thing really.

I've just sold an E39 530i Sport (255 rear tyres) that could corner quicker than the E34 M5 (my second) I've replaced it with. The 530 was quicker round bends, and had a more consistent power delivery, but was dull unless you were driving fit to have an accident when it became a very impressive car. Except in the wet when the detachment from the road, the electronic throttle, the DSC could not match the predictability of the E34 with its LSD, mechanical throttle, and oh-so-relaxed chassis. I could have had a significant accident in the E39 in a low-grip situation I felt the E34 would have told me about before things got messy. Overall I feel safer AND more thrilled in the E34 M5 - so where's the downside?? (I'll tell you - the odd breakdown!!)

Having said all this I will say if you've set your heart on the E39 - do it! You won't regret any M5 ownership if you go into it with your pockets open, and all the cars are phenomenal machines on a different level from any other 5 series, and probably any other saloon car. The Audi RS4 scores well largely because of the novelty value of anything getting close to Bimmer's absolute finest.

If you are not definitely set on an E39, just get someone to let you sample the S38 climb it's rev range in a tunnel.......

Edited by Baddie on Tuesday 29th April 23:19
For me total opposite I am afraid -
I have owned both an early (1990) 3.6 litre e34 ///M5 and also a later (1995) 3.8 litre sixspeed big brake Limited Edition e34 ///M5.
I now have an e39 ///M5 (facelift) and can honestly say that (personally speaking) it is the fastest, safest and most entertaining out of the three !
The low down torque is awesome, it pulls in ANY of the six gears at ANY revs whereas the big sixes lacked torque- even the 3.8 in comparison sometimes left me a few car lentghs down out of an island to a modest family hatch if the right gear was not selected.
Everything feels so right in the e39 ///M5, the way the car rocks to the big V8 on start up, that V8 burble at idle, the redline lower down when cold so as not to over rev until fluids warmed, precise switch gear, firm yet comfortable suspension communicating with you, and I have still to mention the sport button, endless pull throughout the rev range, better fuel economy, cheaper services, no nightmares on edc failure as per e34 3.8's.
Dont get me wrong I have enjoyed every ///M5 I have been fortunate to own but for me, 400bhp V8 e39 ///M5 is the one to have "ultimate driving machine" it is just so right !
Just to throw the cat amonst the pigeons, i side with baddie on this one. Whilst the E39 is undoubtedly a marvel to drive and be in, i always saw the E34 as being its slightly harsher bigger brother. It needs to be worked to get the best from it, but the thrill and challenge of driving it quickly is something that i have always enjoyed. The complete lack of electronic interferance only adds to the enjoyment factor IMO. Mine sounds utterly fabulous when revved, with far more character than the V8 in the E39. You have to drive the E34, where as the E39 lacks that little bit of extra feedback that you get from its older sibling.
I'm not meaning this to sound like i'm having a go, as everybody has different opinions, but the electronic gimmicks on the E39 i always thought let it down. I don't need to be told not to rev it hard when cold, mine has the most fantastic burble at idle, the switch gear and feedback are the best out of any car i've driven, and the running costs, whilst expensive, pale in comparison to what it can cost to run an E39.
I have so far spent in the region of £8000 to get mine almost mechanically perfect, and as with all cars you can get good ones and bad ones. I bought mine with the knowledge i would need to spend a good amount of money on it. It after all is 13 years old and has 100k on the clock. Tales of wallet wilting £20k running costs/warrenty issues over 3 years for the E39 are enough to make even an E34 3.8 owner cry.
At the end of the day it is down to personal opinion, and thankfully every still has theirs. I will always side with the E34, but then again i'm rather biased as i adore mine and can't think of anything i could replace it with. The best suggestion i can come up with is to drive a good example of both and then decide, after all it's you cash you'll be spending!!
DTW is spot on. It is a personal choice, but the E39 I owned felt like driving with the nanny after the E34. The older car has an oil temp guage which you have to read when you want to rev it, and your brain is the traction control - which would only be stressful in any other 340 hp car. The whole car rocks while idling at traffic lights because there's no VANOS to smooth the 90BHP/litre overlap, and I've set off Passat car alarms with the burble from a standard factory exhaust (straight-thru back box!). The howl it produces at 6500 rpm in a tunnel is race car pure and, to be honest a 308/328 is not the dream car it once was - it just doesn't sound good enough, pedigree enough.

All of these cars are a big-stakes reliability lucky dip. My reading was that the E39 was more of a chancer's game with potentially bigger pitfalls (and Ashok's E60 the biggest of all). If the E39 produces better fuel economy I can only put it down to the UK being too small to enjoy its Autobahn smashing performance so you just waft around in sixth everywhere - it's not what I'd heard about a mate's E39 but he drives like a nutter.

Apart from the passive safety, the one thing I think is a big improvement on the E39 is the low rev torque, but then again there is something special about waiting for the moment when you WILL leave everything else behind, makes you appreciate the moment all the more. If you want torque a 535d has more than any of them.;)

In my experience DSC is not a big safety enhancement, in a year the only time I really needed it to do something to my horror it did nothing. When it did cut in I was usually expecting it and had already started to do something.

EDC will soon no longer be the issue it was - check m5board.

The appeal of this debate is especially acute for those with their purchase money still in their pockets - to still be deciding what M5 to buy is an exquisite pleasure, enjoy every moment. Best of luck whichever car you go for, you will be happy, and you will not be able to go back to normal motoring.

Anwar