996TT Porous Block
Discussion
I have heard from an ex OPC mechanic of a few early 996tt having engine replacements due to oil leakage. The GT3/GT2/Turbo engine is derived from the GT1. Apparantly there is one join between components where the engine is designed not to have a gasket where normal engines would have one. AFAIK all identifed cases have had new replacement engines under warranty with loan car etc.
DAZ
>> Edited by dazren on Monday 15th September 23:04
DAZ
>> Edited by dazren on Monday 15th September 23:04
2 weeks further on and the block is still away being crack tested. The OPC indicated that they've seen a porous block prob with one other 996TT (2002MY). If this turns out to be the prob with mine , then they've indicated they will replace with a new block, so no new engine in my case. However at the very least I'll be requesting an additional 2 years warranty on the engine if it gets rebuilt. I'll report back on the outcome.
Toby
Toby
Today , almost 4 weeks after my car went in I finally get confirmation from the OPC that the TT block is porous - to be replaced & the engine rebuilt over the next couple of weeks.
Porsche GB called me out of the blue last week (dealer must have informed them) - offered full standard warranty extended at no charge , free service and a loan of a Boxster S until my car is ready
>> Edited by toby tucker on Saturday 27th September 03:15
Porsche GB called me out of the blue last week (dealer must have informed them) - offered full standard warranty extended at no charge , free service and a loan of a Boxster S until my car is ready
>> Edited by toby tucker on Saturday 27th September 03:15
Only a boxster S ?
If it was me, with a 80k car off the road for so long.. I know i certainly would want more than a Box S as a relacement (no disrespect to the S)
another TT should be doable, or at the very least a 996c4s cab.
I wouldnt stand for a Boxster in replacement for the 'top of the range' porshce.
If it was me, with a 80k car off the road for so long.. I know i certainly would want more than a Box S as a relacement (no disrespect to the S)
another TT should be doable, or at the very least a 996c4s cab.
I wouldnt stand for a Boxster in replacement for the 'top of the range' porshce.
Now, now, Jamie - the Boxster S is a damn fine thoroughbred - whatever anybody tells you.
Despite horrendous precipitation, the great Don Corleone exposed me to the genius of it's balance and poise at a farcically dangerous Silverstone not so long ago...
Apart from a fantastic soundtrack of nape prickling delight around 7000 rpm, the sheer balleticism on show was an absolute honour to experience: and having driven GregE240's silver machine at Brunters a while back too, an 'S' would be more than acceptable as a loaner.
A truly GREAT car!
Despite horrendous precipitation, the great Don Corleone exposed me to the genius of it's balance and poise at a farcically dangerous Silverstone not so long ago...
Apart from a fantastic soundtrack of nape prickling delight around 7000 rpm, the sheer balleticism on show was an absolute honour to experience: and having driven GregE240's silver machine at Brunters a while back too, an 'S' would be more than acceptable as a loaner.
A truly GREAT car!
No doubt der, the S is a truly awesome car... but its no TT, nor TT replacement.
If I bought a TT, which then proceeded to break, due to a known issue, and off road for nigh on a month, before the problem was identified, and then longer before its returned, I know I certainly would want a Like for Like replacement car, AND some hefty compensation.
It seems that the Compensation element is somewhat there, with the Warranty extension (tho it doesnt actually COST them anything.. its a token) I certainly wouldnt see why I should be disadvantaged simply as the product I was sold was flawed.
Were it me, I would be playing merry hell at the offer of the S, and demanding something befitting the expense I have laid out. a replacement TT, or even a Cab TT just as a SORRY and Thank you for bearing with us.
but, maybe I am too picky ? You tell me.
If I bought a TT, which then proceeded to break, due to a known issue, and off road for nigh on a month, before the problem was identified, and then longer before its returned, I know I certainly would want a Like for Like replacement car, AND some hefty compensation.
It seems that the Compensation element is somewhat there, with the Warranty extension (tho it doesnt actually COST them anything.. its a token) I certainly wouldnt see why I should be disadvantaged simply as the product I was sold was flawed.
Were it me, I would be playing merry hell at the offer of the S, and demanding something befitting the expense I have laid out. a replacement TT, or even a Cab TT just as a SORRY and Thank you for bearing with us.
but, maybe I am too picky ? You tell me.
derestrictor said:
and having driven GregE240's silver machine at Brunters a while back too, an 'S' would be more than acceptable as a loaner.
A truly GREAT car!
Oy, Nowvan monkey, send me a large cheque PDQ before I print this orf and show 'er indoors the utterance "Greg's Silver Machine". Expect a filling in from the Little Lady before tea and crumpets on the 12th, me laddo
Amazingly, you confuse her silver machine with mine. Question: How the did you do that?
Gassing Station | Porsche General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff