80mm throttle body

Author
Discussion

marT350T

Original Poster:

948 posts

220 months

Thursday 9th October 2008
quotequote all
Aprat from ebay can anyone tell me where I could purchase an 80mm throttle body for a decent price ?

350Matt

3,740 posts

280 months

Thursday 9th October 2008
quotequote all
Lorry breakers yard?

stevieturbo

17,278 posts

248 months

Thursday 9th October 2008
quotequote all
Might be worth considering....that I'm using a 85mm TB which IMO is far bigger than I need.
I seen no gains switching my intake from standard/73mmTB to current setup with 85mm TB.

What size is your IC plumbing ??


IMO, in a lot of cases, especially a turbo car, all that fitting a large, or worse excessively large TB will do, is throw throttle response/control out the window.

Is there a huge difference in performance between 50% throttle, and 100% throttle at present once on boost ??

Fit a bigger TB and that might turn into little difference with 25%-100%

BB-Q

1,697 posts

211 months

Thursday 9th October 2008
quotequote all
I got a Nissan Infinity Q45 throttle body- 90mm, I believe- from the states cheap. I found another one for sale on our forums for $70+shipping:

http://forums.turbobricks.com/showthread.php?t=145...

Let me know if you can't see the link. They've got a cool mechanical/bi-metal air bypass valve too, so you can get rid of the electrical one.

stevieturbo

17,278 posts

248 months

Friday 10th October 2008
quotequote all
Even at 1000bhp...is a 90mm necessary ????


Certainly on LS engines....whether its a standard 73mm TB or any larger sizes.....power isnt any different.

And if you are using 3" IC plumbing, fitting a larger TB than that, is just plain stupid IMO.


marT350T

Original Poster:

948 posts

220 months

Friday 10th October 2008
quotequote all
I need a 80mm TB as I have just odered a new inlet manifold from USA the is supposed to come with a 80mm TB. But it is a drive by wire one which is no good as I hane a throttle cable.

The manifold has a 80mm x 80mm opening designed for 80mm TB. I thought if I attached my orignal TB to this manifold (which is 70mm i think) I thought I would be strangling power.

I have 3" pipe work from the charge cooler at the moment but I plan on moving the postion of the c/cooler so the pipe work run will be very short and get some 80mm pipe work made up.

eliot

11,467 posts

255 months

Friday 10th October 2008
quotequote all
Cant really tell what you are talking about from your profile, but 3" inlet piping flows alot of air.
What engine? power?

marT350T

Original Poster:

948 posts

220 months

Friday 10th October 2008
quotequote all
eliot said:
Cant really tell what you are talking about from your profile, but 3" inlet piping flows alot of air.
What engine? power?
The TB is for my mid engined polo. with a Modified 1930cc 20v Turbo with approx 430 bhp

Bollah

558 posts

188 months

Friday 10th October 2008
quotequote all
marT350T said:
eliot said:
Cant really tell what you are talking about from your profile, but 3" inlet piping flows alot of air.
What engine? power?
The TB is for my mid engined polo. with a Modified 1930cc 20v Turbo with approx 430 bhp
Not really necessary then. My throttle body is only 52mm and it will do over 400bhp without any issues, i know of another coupe with a 60mm throttle body doing 616bhp. Big isn't always better

stevieturbo

17,278 posts

248 months

Friday 10th October 2008
quotequote all
What size is the outlet of your turbocharger ?

If its bigger than 80mm, and all plumbing to the TB is 80mm...then perhaps its worth fitting an 80mm TB.....



On the other hand, I'd say it's just plain stupid to do so, and will cost you dearly in throttle control, and gain absolutely no power whatsoever.

BB-Q

1,697 posts

211 months

Friday 10th October 2008
quotequote all
good point, but it makes me wonder why Nissan felt the need to produce a massive throttle body for the Infiniti Q45?

stevieturbo

17,278 posts

248 months

Friday 10th October 2008
quotequote all
BB-Q said:
good point, but it makes me wonder why Nissan felt the need to produce a massive throttle body for the Infiniti Q45?
Boost.

BB-Q

1,697 posts

211 months

Friday 10th October 2008
quotequote all
stevieturbo said:
BB-Q said:
good point, but it makes me wonder why Nissan felt the need to produce a massive throttle body for the Infiniti Q45?
Boost.
Where? Mine or theirs? If they produced this TB just to allow me to stuff 30+psi into my engine then I'll write them a note and thank them, but I think I may be getting grandiose ideas here. tongue out

The Q45 was N/A. Shame- would've been awesome boosted.yes

stevieturbo

17,278 posts

248 months

Saturday 11th October 2008
quotequote all
BB-Q said:
stevieturbo said:
BB-Q said:
good point, but it makes me wonder why Nissan felt the need to produce a massive throttle body for the Infiniti Q45?
Boost.
Where? Mine or theirs? If they produced this TB just to allow me to stuff 30+psi into my engine then I'll write them a note and thank them, but I think I may be getting grandiose ideas here. tongue out

The Q45 was N/A. Shame- would've been awesome boosted.yes
Is a Q45 boosted...? no.

totally different ball game

IMO, and Ive said it plenty of times, fitting such a large TB, to such a small boosted engine, is just plain stupid.

You will have no throttle control whatsoever.

It'll probably flow enough air at 25% opening for full power......so essentially, you will have 0-25% throttle control, and 25%-100% makes sweet FA difference.


Edited by stevieturbo on Saturday 11th October 14:32

BB-Q

1,697 posts

211 months

Saturday 11th October 2008
quotequote all
stevieturbo said:
BB-Q said:
stevieturbo said:
BB-Q said:
good point, but it makes me wonder why Nissan felt the need to produce a massive throttle body for the Infiniti Q45?
Boost.
Where? Mine or theirs? If they produced this TB just to allow me to stuff 30+psi into my engine then I'll write them a note and thank them, but I think I may be getting grandiose ideas here. tongue out

The Q45 was N/A. Shame- would've been awesome boosted.yes
Is a Q45 boosted...? no.

totally different ball game

IMO, and Ive said it plenty of times, fitting such a large TB, to such a small boosted engine, is just plain stupid.

You will have no throttle control whatsoever.

It'll probably flow enough air at 25% opening for full power......so essentially, you will have 0-25% throttle control, and 25%-100% makes sweet FA difference.


Edited by stevieturbo on Saturday 11th October 14:32
The engine size has less to do with it than the power it's making, though. Lets say, for example, that the engine makes 300bhp and that requires 500cfm. Assuming relatively similar engine efficiencies then the engine size is irrelevant, it would still need to flow that volume to produce that amount of power.

What would be best would be to get someone to flow test a couple of throttle bodies to see at which point they begin to restrict flow. I'll ask on Turbobricks if anyone has done it and post up the results if I'm successful.

stevieturbo

17,278 posts

248 months

Sunday 12th October 2008
quotequote all
430bhp isnt a lot.

Even the Cossie guys know this, and are happy with a TB around 55mm.

You cant compare flow ratings based on n/a, with that of air under pressure.

CSA is all you can go by when it comes to boost....

As the same CSA might flow 100cfm n/a, 200cfm at 1 bar, 300cfm at 2 bar etc etc, all with virtually zero restriction imposed to the actual air at that diameter.

As Ive said, a 75mm standard LS1 TB will happily support over 1000bhp with boost, and has been proven on some 8sec cars.. and others, many times.


BB-Q

1,697 posts

211 months

Sunday 12th October 2008
quotequote all
Good point. Is that standard LS1 tb 75mm inside diameter- i.e. actually measured?

stevieturbo

17,278 posts

248 months

Sunday 12th October 2008
quotequote all
Somewhere in and around that, yes..

But fittng huge TB's, when the turbo has a 50mm outlet, and perhaps either 50, or 63mm IC plumbing, or even 76mm plumbing....

Well, its a bit daft fitting a TB with an open CSA far larger than the plumbing in the first place !!
When chances are, the open diameter of the plumbing car far exceed the flow capacity of the engine anyway.