What External HDD

Author
Discussion

Xaero

Original Poster:

4,060 posts

216 months

Saturday 10th July 2010
quotequote all
I'm in the market for a new External HDD.

I currently have a 500Gb 2.5" Buffalo one which I'm happy with.

Need a new one for extra storage/backup, and I want to empty my netbooks HDD so it runs faster.

Anyone have recommendations? Most important feature is it's small and portable, so no 3.5" ones. I want 1Tb ideally too, the more the merrier.

Also I'd prefer it to be under £100 but I think most 2.5" 1Tbs are around £130ish, which I don't mind stretching too if it's good. Need reliability too, I know a few 1Tb ones cock up.

-DeaDLocK-

3,367 posts

252 months

Sunday 11th July 2010
quotequote all
They're all basically the same. Before you settle on any one model, just go over to Newegg and Amazon USA to read the user reviews on it to make sure you're not buying a drive with a high failure rate.

Silent1

19,761 posts

236 months

Sunday 11th July 2010
quotequote all
GEt whatever one contains a hitachi drive.

Or buy an icybox and build one yourself.

Xaero

Original Poster:

4,060 posts

216 months

Sunday 11th July 2010
quotequote all
I guess Googling is the only way to work out which one have hitachi drives?

Was hoping someone would recommend one they've already bought, thanks all the same though.

Silent1

19,761 posts

236 months

Sunday 11th July 2010
quotequote all
All my external hard drives are icyboxes containing Hitachi Deskstar drives, basically you want a drive with a transfer rate of around 400mbps as that's the USB 2.0 specification speed, so something like this:
Hitachi Deskstar 500gb

or this:
Hitachi Deskstar 500mb

Combined with this [url]Icybox|http://www.icybox.com.tw/page/3.5_products/3.5_ib-371stus2b.htm[url] will be perfect.

Space Invader

73 posts

167 months

Sunday 11th July 2010
quotequote all
Get one that you can Raid if what you're storing is important.

Xaero

Original Poster:

4,060 posts

216 months

Sunday 11th July 2010
quotequote all
Silent1 - that's a 3.5" drive. It might be better technically, but portability is more important for it, so weight and size needs to be lower.

Silent1

19,761 posts

236 months

Sunday 11th July 2010
quotequote all
Ah st, sorry didn't see the size requirement bit!