Carrying a swiss army knife in the car
Discussion
The least they could do is allow an exception for qualified engineers. When it comes to it why not shotgun cert holders too, after all if you are allowed to carry a shotgun why not a knife? What about if you have an enhanced crb?
I do understand the need to control knife crime, but why is there not a simple way for law abiding citizens to carry tools without breaking the law.
I do understand the need to control knife crime, but why is there not a simple way for law abiding citizens to carry tools without breaking the law.
Edited by Toltec on Monday 17th September 10:11
Toltec said:
The least they could do is allow an exception for qualified engineers. When it comes to it why not shotgun cert holders too, after all if you are allowed to carry a shotgun why not a knife? What about if you have an enhanced crb?
I do understand the need to control knife crime, but why is there not a simple way for law abiding citizens to carry tools without breaking the law.
You aren't allowed to carry a shotgun in the manner you suggest. You are allowed to carry any gun that you have lawful right to have in your possession, providing it is covered in a manner such that it may not be fired. It must be unloaded (there is an argument that ammunition in any magazine is the same as loaded, even if the magazine is not in the gun. The carriage is supposed to be for the purpose of taking it to or from a place of legal use (or to/from a dealer). Thus, in essence you are allowed to carry only with reasonable excuse.I do understand the need to control knife crime, but why is there not a simple way for law abiding citizens to carry tools without breaking the law.
Edited by Toltec on Monday 17th September 10:11
Similarly, you are permitted the same privilege with a knife. You can carry one if you have reasonable excuse.
Just in case in either situation is not normally reasonable excuse, although someone like a scouts leader, diver etc may successfully argue the just in case argument
Dibble said:
The law wrt bladed/pointed articles clearly outlines that you need a reason (work, religion, costume) etc...
A religious reason? Required in case of sudden fatted pig sacrifice emergency? To cut up a fish to feed a medium sized rural Norfolk Settlement?
What circumstances could there possibly be that a god botherer needs to carry a blade?
Utterpiffle said:
Dibble said:
The law wrt bladed/pointed articles clearly outlines that you need a reason (work, religion, costume) etc...
A religious reason? Required in case of sudden fatted pig sacrifice emergency? To cut up a fish to feed a medium sized rural Norfolk Settlement?
What circumstances could there possibly be that a god botherer needs to carry a blade?
Similarly, the Scottish National (male) dress has included in it a small bladed knife.
Strangely, back when the 1997 Firearms Act was being enacted, there was an argument put forward relating to the right to keep and bear arms. I heard it said on more than one occasion that this related to the keeping and bearing of a sword. I wonder what would happen if you walked down Whitehall or somewhere similar with a sword in a sheath attached to your belt. I bet it would be far from welcomed.
Utterpiffle said:
Dibble said:
The law wrt bladed/pointed articles clearly outlines that you need a reason (work, religion, costume) etc...
A religious reason? Required in case of sudden fatted pig sacrifice emergency? To cut up a fish to feed a medium sized rural Norfolk Settlement?
What circumstances could there possibly be that a god botherer needs to carry a blade?
OP: surely the question should be, as with any risk, what's the likelihood of you ever being in a position to have to reveal said lethal weapon?
In nearly 30 years of driving and riding motorcycles I have never had my car searched by HM's Finest. What do you do which might prompt same?
Pothole said:
Utterpiffle said:
Dibble said:
The law wrt bladed/pointed articles clearly outlines that you need a reason (work, religion, costume) etc...
A religious reason? Required in case of sudden fatted pig sacrifice emergency? To cut up a fish to feed a medium sized rural Norfolk Settlement?
What circumstances could there possibly be that a god botherer needs to carry a blade?
OP: surely the question should be, as with any risk, what's the likelihood of you ever being in a position to have to reveal said lethal weapon?
In nearly 30 years of driving and riding motorcycles I have never had my car searched by HM's Finest. What do you do which might prompt same?
Had they found, or seen say a blade or something, I guess they may or may not have been more preoccupied to turn a blind eye.
But you do not always have to have actually done anything to be stopped and asked to open your boot. I guess you could refuse, but what message would that then give?
daz3210 said:
You aren't allowed to carry a shotgun in the manner you suggest. You are allowed to carry any gun that you have lawful right to have in your possession, providing it is covered in a manner such that it may not be fired. It must be unloaded (there is an argument that ammunition in any magazine is the same as loaded, even if the magazine is not in the gun. The carriage is supposed to be for the purpose of taking it to or from a place of legal use (or to/from a dealer). Thus, in essence you are allowed to carry only with reasonable excuse.
Where in the Firearms Act does it say that?Old Fart said:
Where in the Firearms Act does it say that?
Which bit?Generally carriage is contained in S.19 of the 1968 Act, but is added to by ACPO Guidelines, which acceptably are not actual law, but will possibly be looked upon as such by a court.
Edited by daz3210 on Monday 17th September 12:10
Old Fart said:
All of it.
For startersFirearms Act 1968 said:
19 Carrying firearm in a public place.A person commits an offence if, without lawful authority or reasonable excuse (the proof whereof lies on him) he has with him in a public place
[F45(a)a loaded shot gun,
(b)an air weapon (whether loaded or not),
(c)any other firearm (whether loaded or not) together with ammunition suitable for use in that firearm, or
(d)an imitation firearm.]
[F45(a)a loaded shot gun,
(b)an air weapon (whether loaded or not),
(c)any other firearm (whether loaded or not) together with ammunition suitable for use in that firearm, or
(d)an imitation firearm.]
daz3210 said:
Pothole said:
Utterpiffle said:
Dibble said:
The law wrt bladed/pointed articles clearly outlines that you need a reason (work, religion, costume) etc...
A religious reason? Required in case of sudden fatted pig sacrifice emergency? To cut up a fish to feed a medium sized rural Norfolk Settlement?
What circumstances could there possibly be that a god botherer needs to carry a blade?
OP: surely the question should be, as with any risk, what's the likelihood of you ever being in a position to have to reveal said lethal weapon?
In nearly 30 years of driving and riding motorcycles I have never had my car searched by HM's Finest. What do you do which might prompt same?
Had they found, or seen say a blade or something, I guess they may or may not have been more preoccupied to turn a blind eye.
But you do not always have to have actually done anything to be stopped and asked to open your boot. I guess you could refuse, but what message would that then give?
In your cases, did the Police look in your spare wheel well? (were they looking for an escaped Lilliputian?)
Also, I would wager that a large majority of us has never had a car search.
From my own POV, I would not feel it worth worrying about, but then I don't generally feel the need to carry an illegal blade in my car.
Old Fart said:
It's always cased in the boot when I am on my way to a shoot, am I allowed to stop for a drink?
Read the act and decide.I have heard it suggested that some forces even try to say that you are not allowed to stop for petrol.
I don't know why you are even arguing, my original post said.....
'If you have the gun in a slip/case, have it unloaded, and are traveling to or from a place of use, you have the defence of reasonable excuse.'
Stopping for refreshments is part of the travel so makes no odds
In the context of the post that prompted my earlier post the suggestion was why is a knife different to a shotgun. My answer was simply it isn't, in both cases you have to have lawful excuse, except a shotgun should be covered and unloaded.
daz3210 said:
Read the act and decide.
I have heard it suggested that some forces even try to say that you are not allowed to stop for petrol.
I don't know why you are even arguing, my original post said.....
'If you have the gun in a slip/case, have it unloaded, and are traveling to or from a place of use, you have the defence of reasonable excuse.'
Stopping for refreshments is part of the travel so makes no odds
In the context of the post that prompted my earlier post the suggestion was why is a knife different to a shotgun. My answer was simply it isn't, in both cases you have to have lawful excuse, except a shotgun should be covered and unloaded.
I'm not arguing, I'm slowly getting peed off with all these stupid laws being put in place to stop a minority of idiots when the majority are law abiding citizens, who are being prosecuted for carrying screwdrivers etc: by overzealous police.I have heard it suggested that some forces even try to say that you are not allowed to stop for petrol.
I don't know why you are even arguing, my original post said.....
'If you have the gun in a slip/case, have it unloaded, and are traveling to or from a place of use, you have the defence of reasonable excuse.'
Stopping for refreshments is part of the travel so makes no odds
In the context of the post that prompted my earlier post the suggestion was why is a knife different to a shotgun. My answer was simply it isn't, in both cases you have to have lawful excuse, except a shotgun should be covered and unloaded.
Where has common sense gone too?
Old Fart said:
daz3210 said:
Read the act and decide.
I have heard it suggested that some forces even try to say that you are not allowed to stop for petrol.
I don't know why you are even arguing, my original post said.....
'If you have the gun in a slip/case, have it unloaded, and are traveling to or from a place of use, you have the defence of reasonable excuse.'
Stopping for refreshments is part of the travel so makes no odds
In the context of the post that prompted my earlier post the suggestion was why is a knife different to a shotgun. My answer was simply it isn't, in both cases you have to have lawful excuse, except a shotgun should be covered and unloaded.
I'm not arguing, I'm slowly getting peed off with all these stupid laws being put in place to stop a minority of idiots when the majority are law abiding citizens, who are being prosecuted for carrying screwdrivers etc: by overzealous police.I have heard it suggested that some forces even try to say that you are not allowed to stop for petrol.
I don't know why you are even arguing, my original post said.....
'If you have the gun in a slip/case, have it unloaded, and are traveling to or from a place of use, you have the defence of reasonable excuse.'
Stopping for refreshments is part of the travel so makes no odds
In the context of the post that prompted my earlier post the suggestion was why is a knife different to a shotgun. My answer was simply it isn't, in both cases you have to have lawful excuse, except a shotgun should be covered and unloaded.
Where has common sense gone too?
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff