Jimmy Saville

[10 Pence Short]

decadence said:

all of that post worries me, but the "13,14,15 year olds" and "fair game" are stand outs... jeez. Savile must be a hero of yours ?

I would imagine your bark is worse than your bite. Maybe you should work out a bit to improve your physique? Gym'll fix it.

[Bitofbully]

Mastodon2 said:

Has it come as a shock to you that such young females are considered acceptable sexual partners in some
parts of the world? Not every society abides by the rules and norms that we consider "right" and "wrong". That doesn't make anyone on this forum a paedophile, or a paediatrician for that matter, it just shows that you are ignorant to how the world outside of Europe functions.

Not just outside of Europe - an age of consent of 14 is relatively common even within the geographic boundaries of Europe.

[Oakey]

And in the Middle East it's acceptable to stone your wife to death if she's caught cheating but that doesn't make it acceptable to smash my OH's head in with a rock in the UK if I catch her playing about.

[decadence]

Roo said:

decadence said:

wow..... couple of guys have some serious st in their closets...
far too defensive about kiddy fiddlers.

Edited by decadence on Thursday 11th October 20:19

You're quite aggressive in all your posts on here, especially the motorsport ones.

Do you have anger management issues?.

Do you fiddle with kids?

[decadence]

Bitofbully said:

Mastodon2 said:

Has it come as a shock to you that such young females are considered acceptable sexual partners in some
parts of the world? Not every society abides by the rules and norms that we consider "right" and "wrong". That doesn't make anyone on this forum a paedophile, or a paediatrician for that matter, it just shows that you are ignorant to how the world outside of Europe functions.

Not just outside of Europe - an age of consent of 14 is relatively common even within the geographic boundaries of Europe.

You do realise that if you get found looking at under 16 porn on your hard drive it's an arrest able offence and will have you placed on the sex offenders register .... best not go to PC world if you have computer issues you nonce.

[NoNeed]

decadence said:

You do realise that if you get found looking at under 16 porn on your hard drive it's an arrest able offence and will have you placed on the sex offenders register .... best not go to PC world if you have computer issues you nonce.

That's not very PH in fact it's not very nice at all.

[decadence]

Bitofbully said:

decadence said:

wow..... couple of guys have some serious st in their closets...
far too defensive about kiddy fiddlers.

You appear to be a bit hard of thinking. Nobody is defending him, just merely pointing out that you're being a bit of a pitchfork wielding mouth-breather who doesn't appreciate the legal and social differences.

suggesting that "13,14,15 year old girls are fair game" in parts of Europe is beyond defending Savile, it's into a whole other territory.
im stunned at you chaps shouting about the difference between abusing a child of 5 and a child of 13...they are both children in my mind and also legally in the UK.
clearly you don't have kids.

[Pedmeister]

decadence said:

Its amazing isn't it?
When its a Knighted White bloke of 'legend' status, we await further evidence in light of these accusations.....
But when its several Asian men of Pakistani origin we are ready en-masse to claim its something to do with 'their culture' and every middle aged Asian man is perceived to be a person hunting 'cheap white meat'....

What i've realised recently is that we hate child abusers if they 'have them too young' (seems over 13 is fair game) or if they arent white blokes............
I swear there was idiots who believed Asian men invented child abuse...truth is its our society thats to blame for not looking after our kids!

I'm being slightly flippant as usual, but i agree that more evidence needs to come to light, but i'd imagine that as a power figure Sir Jimmy Saville is as larger than life you can get, so i can imagine a young girl putting away these events into her distant memory as who would believe her right?
If we could make a decision based on looks alone....he looks like Paedophile

I couldn't have put it more succintly, you are indeed being very flippant. The basis of your logic is flawed. You evidently are not aware that Saville was interviewed in 2008 by Police in relation to an allegation of a sexual nature. He wasn't charged due to a lack of evidence-basically, it boiled down to his word against that of one other. No independant witnesses. No medical or forensic evidence etc Ergo- no charge.

The evidence against the Asian gang was overwhelming-hence the CPS charged them and they were subsequently found guilty by a jury of twelve MOP. You appear doubt the fact that these Asians targetted the females due to their race. It is obvious they they exclusively targetted white females, I wonder why?

I simply do not understand how you can arrive at the generalisation that, 'WE,' as a society, have concluded that, "Every Asian man is perceived to be hunting cheap white meat." What evidence do you have to support such a ridiculous piece of supposition?! Absolute nonsense. You compound this ill conceived 'logic,' by alluding to the effect that, 'WE,' "Hate child abusers, if 'they have them too young,' (Isn't that why we categorise these odious types as child abusers?!), or if they aren't white blokes...." Please elucidate on this point and explain how you have concluded that somehow, as a society, we regard white paedophiles as more acceptable than Asian paedophiles. What are you basing your opinion on??

[decadence]

NoNeed said:

decadence said:

You do realise that if you get found looking at under 16 porn on your hard drive it's an arrest able offence and will have you placed on the sex offenders register .... best not go to PC world if you have computer issues you nonce.

That's not very PH in fact it's not very nice at all.

like I want to be apart of this Sorid little place when there's people defending abusing underage girls. if finding child abusers vile makes me a bad person then fine..

[Red Devil]

NoNeed said:

decadence said:

You do realise that if you get found looking at under 16 porn on your hard drive it's an arrest able offence and will have you placed on the sex offenders register .... best not go to PC world if you have computer issues you nonce.

That's not very PH in fact it's not very nice at all.

He quite the internet hard man isn't he? Would he have the cojones to repeat that last bit to the poster face to face?

Somehow I rather doubt it.

[decadence]

Pedmeister said:

decadence said:

Its amazing isn't it?
When its a Knighted White bloke of 'legend' status, we await further evidence in light of these accusations.....
But when its several Asian men of Pakistani origin we are ready en-masse to claim its something to do with 'their culture' and every middle aged Asian man is perceived to be a person hunting 'cheap white meat'....

What i've realised recently is that we hate child abusers if they 'have them too young' (seems over 13 is fair game) or if they arent white blokes............
I swear there was idiots who believed Asian men invented child abuse...truth is its our society thats to blame for not looking after our kids!

I'm being slightly flippant as usual, but i agree that more evidence needs to come to light, but i'd imagine that as a power figure Sir Jimmy Saville is as larger than life you can get, so i can imagine a young girl putting away these events into her distant memory as who would believe her right?
If we could make a decision based on looks alone....he looks like Paedophile

I couldn't have put it more succintly, you are indeed being very flippant. The basis of your logic is flawed. You evidently are not aware that Saville was interviewed in 2008 by Police in relation to an allegation of a sexual nature. He wasn't charged due to a lack of evidence-basically, it boiled down to his word against that of one other. No independant witnesses. No medical or forensic evidence etc Ergo- no charge.

The evidence against the Asian gang was overwhelming-hence the CPS charged them and they were subsequently found guilty by a jury of twelve MOP. You appear doubt the fact that these Asians targetted the females due to their race. It is obvious they they exclusively targetted white females, I wonder why?

I simply do not understand how you can arrive at the generalisation that, 'WE,' as a society, have concluded that, "Every Asian man is perceived to be hunting cheap white meat." What evidence do you have to support such a ridiculous piece of supposition?! Absolute nonsense. You compound this ill conceived 'logic,' by alluding to the effect that, 'WE,' "Hate child abusers, if 'they have them too young,' (Isn't that why we categorise these odious types as child abusers?!), or if they aren't white blokes...." Please elucidate on this point and explain how you have concluded that somehow, as a society, we regard white paedophiles as more acceptable than Asian paedophiles. What are you basing your opinion on??

can you read? Jack Straw said "cheap white meat" and there are at least 3 posters in the last page who have clearly said "13,14,15 year olds are fair game".....

[decadence]

Red Devil said:

NoNeed said:

decadence said:

You do realise that if you get found looking at under 16 porn on your hard drive it's an arrest able offence and will have you placed on the sex offenders register .... best not go to PC world if you have computer issues you nonce.

That's not very PH in fact it's not very nice at all.

He quite the internet hard man isn't he? Would he have the cojones to repeat that last bit to the poster face to face?

Somehow I rather doubt it.

I wonder how many of the posters would dare mention the fact abusing 13 to 15 year olds " dosen't make me a paedo" in their local pub or to their girlfriends/ wives/ work mates etc..
but it's find to suggest it on a forum...

[Catweazle]

decadence said:

Bitofbully said:

decadence said:

wow..... couple of guys have some serious st in their closets...
far too defensive about kiddy fiddlers.

You appear to be a bit hard of thinking. Nobody is defending him, just merely pointing out that you're being a bit of a pitchfork wielding mouth-breather who doesn't appreciate the legal and social differences.

suggesting that "13,14,15 year old girls are fair game" in parts of Europe is beyond defending Savile, it's into a whole other territory.
im stunned at you chaps shouting about the difference between abusing a child of 5 and a child of 13...they are both children in my mind and also legally in the UK.
clearly you don't have kids.

You may not see the difference between a child of 5 and a child of 13 but the law does.

[Kinky]

Thread already running here, so lets keep it all together

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...