Discussion
News from Silicon.com:
http://hardware.silicon.com/servers/0,39024647,39125553,00.htm
DVLA databases only "40 per cent" accurate
November 03 2004
by Andy McCue
Police forced to resort to manual checks on suspect vehicles?
The quality of information in the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency's (DVLA) databases is so poor that police taking part in a high-tech number plate scanning trial were forced to resort to manual visual checks on suspect vehicles.
The weaknesses in the accuracy of data in the DVLA's databases were flagged up in a report into a year-long trial by 23 police forces using automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) technology to check vehicles against various intelligence databases.
Home Secretary David Blunkett has just announced £15m of funding to extend the ANPR project nationwide after the 'Laser 2' trial led to 13,000 arrests and the seizure of £8m-worth of drugs and property.
During the trial, ANPR teams in police forces were able to use the automatic scanning technology in police vehicles and CCTV cameras to cross-reference vehicle registration plates against information held in the Police National Computer, local intelligence systems and DVLA tax disc and vehicle owner databases.
But a report into the trial, commissioned by the Home Office and carried out by PA Consulting, slams the accuracy of data held in the DVLA's databases.
The report says the quality of data actually got worse over the course of the trial, falling from 51 per cent to 40 per cent, and police officers were forced to resort to carrying out visual checks on vehicle tax discs rather than relying on the DVLA data because of "decreased confidence in using the DVLA databases as the primary means of stop".
"The DVLA databases in particular were shown to be poor. As yet, there are no Criminal Justice Extranet (CJX) facilities for the electronic transfer of updated information to forces on a daily basis and this is a further limitation on database accuracy," the report said. "Further, there is a lack of rigorous understanding as to the precise causes of data inaccuracies. As data is key to ANPR, we conclude that this represents a weakness that should be addressed."
Among recommendations to improve the use of ANPR are direct links from police forces to the new computerised MOT database, which is due to go live later this year, and motor insurance databases, which flag up vehicles without insurance.
It also calls for a national "vehicle intelligence data warehouse" to reduce reliance on locally produced and held information, which would also fit into the national intelligence sharing strategy put forward by the Bichard Inquiry into the Soham murder investigation.
"This data warehouse should also hold ANPR reads and hits, which are themselves a vital source of vehicle intelligence and should be accompanied by the development of data mining tools of a more sophisticated nature," the report said.
Overlap or compatibility with the national ID card scheme would also have to be considered when designing a national vehicle register, according to PA Consulting.
Long-term funding of the ANPR technology also remains an issue. The year-long trial cost £12m, which was partly funded by £1m recovered by police using the technology. But the report admits this would not cover the cost of the full-time police needed to operate the technology and carry out the vehicle checks.
A spokesman for the DVLA said a number of improvements have been introduced since the report to ensure a greater level of accuracy in the data supplied to police.
"The DVLA continues to work closely with the police on this matter. The Agency is currently working on an initiative which will enable data to be transferred electronically to the police. In the meantime, special arrangements for the transfer of this information are being set up with New Scotland Yard."
=========================================
This stems from this report:
www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs3/Driving_crime_down.pdf
(apologies for posting the report reference in a thread about something completely different! Too many forum posts, too little time ...
)
http://hardware.silicon.com/servers/0,39024647,39125553,00.htm
DVLA databases only "40 per cent" accurate
November 03 2004
by Andy McCue
Police forced to resort to manual checks on suspect vehicles?
The quality of information in the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency's (DVLA) databases is so poor that police taking part in a high-tech number plate scanning trial were forced to resort to manual visual checks on suspect vehicles.
The weaknesses in the accuracy of data in the DVLA's databases were flagged up in a report into a year-long trial by 23 police forces using automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) technology to check vehicles against various intelligence databases.
Home Secretary David Blunkett has just announced £15m of funding to extend the ANPR project nationwide after the 'Laser 2' trial led to 13,000 arrests and the seizure of £8m-worth of drugs and property.
During the trial, ANPR teams in police forces were able to use the automatic scanning technology in police vehicles and CCTV cameras to cross-reference vehicle registration plates against information held in the Police National Computer, local intelligence systems and DVLA tax disc and vehicle owner databases.
But a report into the trial, commissioned by the Home Office and carried out by PA Consulting, slams the accuracy of data held in the DVLA's databases.
The report says the quality of data actually got worse over the course of the trial, falling from 51 per cent to 40 per cent, and police officers were forced to resort to carrying out visual checks on vehicle tax discs rather than relying on the DVLA data because of "decreased confidence in using the DVLA databases as the primary means of stop".
"The DVLA databases in particular were shown to be poor. As yet, there are no Criminal Justice Extranet (CJX) facilities for the electronic transfer of updated information to forces on a daily basis and this is a further limitation on database accuracy," the report said. "Further, there is a lack of rigorous understanding as to the precise causes of data inaccuracies. As data is key to ANPR, we conclude that this represents a weakness that should be addressed."
Among recommendations to improve the use of ANPR are direct links from police forces to the new computerised MOT database, which is due to go live later this year, and motor insurance databases, which flag up vehicles without insurance.
It also calls for a national "vehicle intelligence data warehouse" to reduce reliance on locally produced and held information, which would also fit into the national intelligence sharing strategy put forward by the Bichard Inquiry into the Soham murder investigation.
"This data warehouse should also hold ANPR reads and hits, which are themselves a vital source of vehicle intelligence and should be accompanied by the development of data mining tools of a more sophisticated nature," the report said.
Overlap or compatibility with the national ID card scheme would also have to be considered when designing a national vehicle register, according to PA Consulting.
Long-term funding of the ANPR technology also remains an issue. The year-long trial cost £12m, which was partly funded by £1m recovered by police using the technology. But the report admits this would not cover the cost of the full-time police needed to operate the technology and carry out the vehicle checks.
A spokesman for the DVLA said a number of improvements have been introduced since the report to ensure a greater level of accuracy in the data supplied to police.
"The DVLA continues to work closely with the police on this matter. The Agency is currently working on an initiative which will enable data to be transferred electronically to the police. In the meantime, special arrangements for the transfer of this information are being set up with New Scotland Yard."
=========================================
This stems from this report:
www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs3/Driving_crime_down.pdf
(apologies for posting the report reference in a thread about something completely different! Too many forum posts, too little time ...
) I bought my new car back in July, since then I've been through 3 ANPR checks in the local area.
Twice at the end of my road with no issue at all and then few weeks back up on the main road I got pulled by an ANPR team who claimed my car had flagged a problem on their system - they wouldn't tell me what.
Needless to say after dumping all my docs on the young bobby I was allowed to continue my journey but not until he'd written down a visual description of me - including height, hair style/colour etc....
Very strange - still, there area lot of car thefts in this rather affluent area of Essex so I'm happy to see them out doing something but ther eis no doubt about it their database is utterly pants.
best
Ex
Twice at the end of my road with no issue at all and then few weeks back up on the main road I got pulled by an ANPR team who claimed my car had flagged a problem on their system - they wouldn't tell me what.
Needless to say after dumping all my docs on the young bobby I was allowed to continue my journey but not until he'd written down a visual description of me - including height, hair style/colour etc....
Very strange - still, there area lot of car thefts in this rather affluent area of Essex so I'm happy to see them out doing something but ther eis no doubt about it their database is utterly pants.
best
Ex
This may go someway to explain it!
I used to believe that ANPR was a great thing, now I have been converted. Anyone who wants to get round the system can do so quite easily:
www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=10&t=134916
I used to believe that ANPR was a great thing, now I have been converted. Anyone who wants to get round the system can do so quite easily:
www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=10&t=134916
supraman2954 said:
All the legitimate owner has to do is report the stolen VRM. The number on the plate then gets logged with the DVLA and a marker is set on the ANPR system. Eventually, the chav will drive past a cam blissfully unaware that the plod just further up the road will have been informed that the plate is stolen. The arrest will usually followed up with further charges of no insurance/mot etc.
ohopkins said:
Thats great, if the crim leaves the plate on his car for any length of time.
However, for a day or two ( especially if he picks a car that has been left for some time ) its a safe bet.
As most numberplates are now so easy to steal, as they are stick on, it would appear the crims simply nick a new set of plates every day.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff