"You're a pig and your breath stinks of bacon"

"You're a pig and your breath stinks of bacon"

Author
Discussion

Mr Trophy

6,808 posts

203 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
See how he moved the car with the phone in his hand, can he not be done for that?

gruffalo

7,521 posts

226 months

Sunday 13th July 2014
quotequote all
SV8Predator said:
Why should he be Tazered?
Because it would make it quieter and prObably less messy to remove him from the gene pool.

CoolHands

18,643 posts

195 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
Elroy Blue said:
You don't need to get physical with people like this. Just knowing what you're talking about is enough. Knowledge is power and all that stuff. Once people realise they're on a losing wicket, the change in their attitude can be pretty spectacular.
errr... he appeared to have the knowledge, and the police were in fact on the losing wicket.

More power to him, IMO

Gareth79

7,670 posts

246 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
La Liga said:
If he really wanted a lesson in the Road Traffic Act, they should have introduced him to S.67 and got an Authorised Vehicle Examiner to go through the vehicle and reported him to court for any defects found.
The driver would request that it's deferred under subsection 6 biggrin If there wasn't an accident and the vehicle isn't "apparently so defective that it ought not to be allowed to proceed without a test" (seems quite strong wording) that is a right.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
Indeed it is. It would have tested his knowledge for sure.

CoolHands

18,643 posts

195 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
La Liga said:
There were no other offences I could see. It's not an offence to simply be a dick.

I wouldn't accept viewing a driving licence through a window for inspection.

If he really wanted a lesson in the Road Traffic Act, they should have introduced him to S.67 and got an Authorised Vehicle Examiner to go through the vehicle and reported him to court for any defects found.

Driving in the manner who apparently did and his irate behaviour, is it reasonable to suspect that's the result of drugs? S.23 search of him and the vehicle would probably be easy to justify.

Moving traffic offence? Why not require a specimen of breath for analysis?

They could have done all these things if they wanted to lower themselves to his level, but chose not to play the "my Dad's bigger game".
That would surely be an abuse of power simply because he wasn't complying with an unlawful order (eg to get out the car). Doesn't seem very smart to me.

even a cursory internet search provides the following

CHAPTER 1

Guidance on Standards of Professional Behaviour

Authority, Respect and Courtesy

1.19 Police officers do not abuse their powers or authority and respect the rights of all individuals.

Orders and Instructions
1.38 Police officers only give and carry out lawful orders and instructions.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
They would be lawful requests and not an abuse of power (the stop and search would need reasonable suspicion based on objective facts, of course).

Someone not wanting to come out the car after committing a moving traffic offence. Why? Have they been drinking. Perfectly legitimate request.

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

128 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
Handbrake turns...antisocial? Power to require details if believed he'd been acting in an anti social manner. Failure to provide details is an arrestable offence.

CoolHands

18,643 posts

195 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
he did provide details. He was also clearly know to the coppers so then its a bit of a piss-take to go through all that if they know who he is. He was denying the handbrake turn - for all we know he gets stopped twice a week for spurious reasons.

Question: if he has given his details and is not being detained or arrested, is he required to get out the car? I wonder if even on the internetz any police will answer that.

Baryonyx

17,996 posts

159 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
Is there not some sort of law against being a bellend?

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
Question: if he has given his details and is not being detained or arrested, is he required to get out the car? I wonder if even on the internetz any police will answer that.
Why do you wonder that? It's not some secret. The answer is no. There has to be a power / lawful request. It's no different from you being pulled on the motorway and being asked to go the police car.

That's why I don't think they were particularly good with this stop. You can't do things that most would consent to with someone who wants to behave in such a manner. They should have been very clear as to their purpose rather than the ambiguity they let themselves get into.








0000

13,812 posts

191 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
I guess it wasn't filmed on a mobile phone then, despite the portrait view?

wildcat45

8,073 posts

189 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all

Polite request to get out of car. Truncheon, Sideglass, pulled from car, a whack or to to the lower back, words of advice, camera goes missing, drugs/weapon discovered in car, charged, magistrates, Serco van, Straneways.

It's probably a good idea that I never become a copper. Hats off to those who have to deal with blokes like this and don't do the above.

Red Devil

13,060 posts

208 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
Yes. If you had, you might have cost whichever constabulary employed you quite a lot of money.
Overreacting isn't particularly smart no matter how much of a bellend the driver is.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2095341/Pe...

Motorrad

6,811 posts

187 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
wildcat45 said:
Polite request to get out of car. Truncheon, Sideglass, pulled from car, a whack or to to the lower back, words of advice, camera goes missing, drugs/weapon discovered in car, charged, magistrates, Serco van, Straneways.

It's probably a good idea that I never become a copper. Hats off to those who have to deal with blokes like this and don't do the above.
Fairly difficult to do if the video is being streamed live to youtube. Which is what I'd be doing if I was to act like the bloke in the video

themanwithnoname

1,634 posts

213 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
SV8Predator said:
Why should he be Tazered?
Because he's a gobby, smart arsed prick who needs a good tazering?

Just saying like...

jbsportstech

5,069 posts

179 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
Seen another vid like this think the guy spends his life or alot of free time getting into these situations so he can play the smart arse routine.

Needs to get a life really, one thing when police over step the mark its quite another to look for a confrontation with them and then play I know better than you.


Eclassy

1,201 posts

122 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
Motorrad said:
Fairly difficult to do if the video is being streamed live to youtube. Which is what I'd be doing if I was to act like the bloke in the video
I have unlimited 4G data and any picture or video is immediately streamed to the cloud.

The power the police weild and the responses on here about videos going missing and ability to magic up offences further reinforces the need to record every interaction with the police.

Asking a person to exit their car to have a word about a handbrake turn is not a lawful order. There is no obligation to exit your car. A lawful order would be to ask a person to exit a car for a breath test.

Not everything the police ask you to do is a lawful order otherwise a policeman could ask a lady to take off her clothes during a traffic stop.

This chap didnt even have to stop for this policeman as he wasnt in uniform plus in an unmarked car.

Was there really a need for 8 officers to turn up? And we are told of staff shortage all the time.

Lost soul

8,712 posts

182 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
Motorrad said:
As for the rest of it I imagine it gets annoying being stopped by the police if it happens frequently..
Why would it happen frequently

Retroman

969 posts

133 months

Monday 14th July 2014
quotequote all
Lost soul said:
Why would it happen frequently
Perhaps the police like to stereotype people or just go on power trips.

When i had my standard pug 106, never got pulled by the police.
When i had my modified Corsa B i got pulled over countless times and often accused of doing things i hadn't done.

I was doing 40mph in a 40mph limit with the police behind me. As soon as it came up to one of the signs that flash to show your speed, the police dropped right back then floored it behind me quickly so the sign flashed, pulled me over and then said i was speeding.

They said they had to do a drug and weapons search on me and my brother for acting suspiciously. I was outside the front of my house washing the car with my brother and a bucket of soapy water.

I was accused of wheelspinning out a junction and struggling to control the vehicle one day. The funny thing was the tyres were too grippy and the engine / clutch too weak to do a wheelspin even if i wanted to.

Funny enough when i installed a dashcam and pointed to it when they pulled me, their attitude changed dramatically