Joining the Police

Author
Discussion

carinaman

21,326 posts

173 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Because Mk3 Spitfire has never had to backtrack and revise their words of advice. The difference between jumping to conclusions and jumping down people's throats is?

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

129 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
carinaman said:
Because Mk3 Spitfire has never had to backtrack and revise their words of advice. The difference between jumping to conclusions and jumping down people's throats is?
Have you ever noticed how often people just completely ignore your posts?

Bigends

5,424 posts

129 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Mk3Spitfire said:
Have you ever noticed how often people just completely ignore your posts?

Bigends

5,424 posts

129 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Bigends said:
Mk3Spitfire said:
Have you ever noticed how often people just completely ignore your posts?
Of course youre not going to take some blood spitting granny mugger home for tea are you - but - once the fisticuffs is over and everybodys calmed down and in custody - get things back on an even keel and act like humans again - get into prisoner handling rather than reactive policing and youll see it makes sense. If youve already done that then you'll know it makes sense
If serving officers post on here how they may treat offenders then comments can be expected surely and open to healthy debate and questioning
PS didnt answer earlier - just in from work.

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

129 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Bigends said:
Of course youre not going to take some blood spitting granny mugger home for tea are you - but - once the fisticuffs is over and everybodys calmed down and in custody - get things back on an even keel and act like humans again - get into prisoner handling rather than reactive policing and youll see it makes sense. If youve already done that then you'll know it makes sense
If serving officers post on here how they may treat offenders then comments can be expected surely and open to healthy debate and questioning
PS didnt answer earlier - just in from work.
I totally agree with you. In fact, a huge amount of intelligence and information comes from people who are sitting waiting to be booked in, if you're decent to them.
I quite enjoy chatting to prisoners as it goes. It's a massive eye opener. The way I see it, is that certainly in some areas, you can be arresting someone one day, and sitting next to them in a pub the next day, and they certainly remember you whether you remember them or not! There will always be some who will not want to talk to someone who's just arrested them, but the majority of them know the score, and play the game.

Comments on here can often be misconstrued or the sentiment lost.

Also, you forgot a full stop in your last sentence, and I spent a couple of minutes wondering what PS you had been questioning!

carinaman

21,326 posts

173 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Where does 'chatting' to detainees while they're waiting to be booked in sit with the caution and the intel provided and the opportunity for detainees to self incriminate?

photosnob

1,339 posts

119 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
carinaman said:
Where does 'chatting' to detainees while they're waiting to be booked in sit with the caution and the intel provided and the opportunity for detainees to self incriminate?
Talking to the police casually is pretty normal. Usually not about the offence you've been arrested for. Depends on the officer as well. I found older ones easier to get along with. They take things in their stride a bit more and don't make everything personal. That's not a dig at young police officers, it's just my observation.

In my experience many "deals" are done with a quite chat. "Don't muck us around here and this is cautionable" you know they have the evidence to charge, and they know they do. But it's a lot more effort and cost for what would be a very low sentence. It's smart policing. In those circumstances I liked the police. You'd often have chats like that in the rooms you speak to the solicitor in - technically it might be against the rules, but it's better for everyone.

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

129 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
carinaman said:
Where does 'chatting' to detainees while they're waiting to be booked in sit with the caution and the intel provided and the opportunity for detainees to self incriminate?
Sorry to disssapoint you once again, but, and I think you know this full well, chatting to prisoners about unrelated matters is absolutely fine. If you took your pedant/anti police/irrelevant link hat off for a second, you'd see the common sense and rationale behind things.

Greendubber

13,222 posts

204 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Mk3Spitfire said:
Sorry to disssapoint you once again, but, and I think you know this full well, chatting to prisoners about unrelated matters is absolutely fine. If you took your pedant/anti police/irrelevant link hat off for a second, you'd see the common sense and rationale behind things.
The 'Argh dont say anything get a brief they're out to fk you over etc etc' brigade.

Or in reality talk about anything that comes up that has nothing to do with the allegation/arrest, normally the quality of the custody 'all day breakfast' microwave meal, how many times have you tasered someone or what team do you follow. After all it's pretty uncomfortable sitting silently for 2 hours waiting to get booked in!

As far as I'm concerned once the cuffs are on and that person is calmed down then I'll quite happily sit there and pass the time. They're not going anywhere any time soon but I know I'll be going somewhere better than the block biggrin

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

129 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
^^ Exactly! Sitting in awkward silence for hours isn't very appealing to me. there are a select few that I'd rather not engage in in-depth philosophical debates with, but I don't mind discussing the weather with the majority of them!

Baryonyx

17,998 posts

160 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
carinaman said:
Where does 'chatting' to detainees while they're waiting to be booked in sit with the caution and the intel provided and the opportunity for detainees to self incriminate?
You seem to have some grasp of the technical terms of this procedure, I'm guessing you've been on the wrong side of the desk a few times. What did you do?

Greendubber

13,222 posts

204 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Mk3Spitfire said:
^^ Exactly! Sitting in awkward silence for hours isn't very appealing to me. there are a select few that I'd rather not engage in in-depth philosophical debates with, but I don't mind discussing the weather with the majority of them!
I won't entertain the ones that are still being pricks though, you know the ones that always say 'if these cuffs weren't on I'd batter you' even though they had ample opportunity to do so before you put the cuffs on hehe

Normally followed by 'you were bullied at school' etc etc. Yes mate I was but enjoy your blue plastic matress and 8ft x 8ft concrete box.

Greendubber

13,222 posts

204 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
You seem to have some grasp of the technical terms of this procedure, I'm guessing you've been on the wrong side of the desk a few times. What did you do?
I think some bizarre obsession, lack of an ordinary hobby and a very little bit of knowledge is more likely than him/her being locked up before.

carinaman

21,326 posts

173 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
How can there be a 'wrong' side when police officers stand both sides of the desk?

Baryonyx

17,998 posts

160 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
carinaman said:
How can there be a 'wrong' side when police officers stand both sides of the desk?
I meant in a metaphorical sense. Wrong side of the law, if you're struggling to follow.

carpetsoiler

1,958 posts

166 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
carinaman said:
How can there be a 'wrong' side when police officers stand both sides of the desk?
I meant in a metaphorical sense. Wrong side of the law, if you're struggling to follow.
He knows full well what was meant, he's just an argumentative moron who likes to engage with semantics and conjecture when things don't go his way.

I recently bumped into someone who I dealt with last year for quite a heavy job. He was a proper handful at the job, to the point where he backed me into a corner and it wasn't looking good. After about 30 mins of chatting to him while he was in handcuffs, it all diffused a little bit and we ended up guiding him through a process to sort his life out. I ran into him a while later after he started an apprenticeship at a company, and he was very grateful that we'd treated him like a human as opposed to a piece of st. He said it had made him rethink his life. Bumped into him again a couple of weeks back when I was out with friends, and he bought me a drink, shot the breeze for a bit, had a laugh about his previous idiocy and disappeared.

Manners make a man, whichever side of the law you're on...

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

129 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
When he had you in the corner, and it was looking bad, did you soil the carpet?

Red 4

10,744 posts

188 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
General rule; if it makes your job easier do it.

However, there are some people who have done things that I found it extremely difficult to be "friendly" towards. Then, just being professional will do.

carpetsoiler

1,958 posts

166 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Mk3Spitfire said:
When he had you in the corner, and it was looking bad, did you soil the carpet?
Touché. hehe

Mk3Spitfire

2,921 posts

129 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
carpetsoiler said:
Touché. hehe
wink Couldn't resist!