Police Officer Smashes Windscreen
Discussion
Former officer says Section 24 of PACE is ripe for misuse 4 minutes and 15 seconds in?:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVch4EpSQ0Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVch4EpSQ0Y
XCP said:
Did he authorise her detention unlawfully then?
Hed have authorised detention on the strength of what the cops told him when they presented her to him. Not too many questions get asked at that point. Not sure why she accepted a caution if the insurance company declined to cooperate and confirm an offence -no doubt talked into itBigends said:
Hed have authorised detention on the strength of what the cops told him when they presented her to him. Not too many questions get asked at that point. Not sure why she accepted a caution if the insurance company declined to cooperate and confirm an offence -no doubt talked into it
So he didn't do his job then. If he was not happy with what was going on he should not have authorised detention until he had got some answers from the arresting officer. Necessity would be a good starting point.Mojooo said:
Bumpage - anyone know what happened with this?
The chap driving the Ranger Rover reportedly got £20K in compensation:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2095341/Pe...
The police officer that smashed the windscreen reportedly got £440K in compensation:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/458223/440k-compe...
carinaman said:
The chap driving the Ranger Rover reportedly got £20K in compensation:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2095341/Pe...
The police officer that smashed the windscreen reportedly got £440K in compensation:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/458223/440k-compe...
Excuse my confusion, isn't this post relating to a totally different event?http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2095341/Pe...
The police officer that smashed the windscreen reportedly got £440K in compensation:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/458223/440k-compe...
carinaman said:
Thanks Bigends.
I couldn't see any updates. News websites say the IPCC are looking into it.
End of the Daily mail article says the IPCC found The police's actions were justified. Range Rover doesn't pull over with the police car following = reasonable to smash the windows to immoblise it, sounds fair enough to me. Fact the pensioner was charged with failing to stop proves this point. I couldn't see any updates. News websites say the IPCC are looking into it.
Utter farce on both pay outs.
Andehh said:
End of the Daily mail article says the IPCC found The police's actions were justified. Range Rover doesn't pull over with the police car following = reasonable to smash the windows to immoblise it, sounds fair enough to me. Fact the pensioner was charged with failing to stop proves this point.
Utter farce on both pay outs.
I think that you're on a different case.Utter farce on both pay outs.
This thread is the coloured guy who was fed up with constant stops/harassment and plod went ballistic.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff