Drive getting redone bloke not turned up

Drive getting redone bloke not turned up

Author
Discussion

Fireblade69

628 posts

204 months

Friday 5th May 2017
quotequote all
Adrian E said:
Round here if you want a dropped kerb, or to modify an existing one, there's a process to go through which is relatively painless but involves the county council's own contractors doing the kerb changes.

Assuming your drive doesn't require planning permission from your district council (ignoring the dropped kerb) then as long as you can access it off your existing dropped kerb and it's suitably drained then I don't think there's an issue (AFAIK and I'm sure will be corrected if it's not!)
In Brighton & Hove you have to use a contractor approved & licensed by the city council. For me, dropping the kerb & tarmacking 1 metre square of verge cost £1000 including licenses, permits, land searches - really. Had to get a letter from network rail even though the nearest track was 2 miles away!

From memory - Gas, Leccy, Water, BT, Virgin, Network Rail & Council were all contacted and needed to provide written approval stating they had no conflict. All bar 1 did it for nothing, can't remember who it was that charged - might have been Southern Water.

Fireblade69

628 posts

204 months

Friday 5th May 2017
quotequote all
alfie2244 said:
No existing dropped kerb where car is parked in photo????? Not seen mentioned that kerb has been altered or extended in any way....did i miss that?
I assume OP wants to drive straight onto the grass bit and there is a crossover there. I also think the trader mentioned it in one of his responses back to the OP so assumed it was part of the requirements of the job.

mcg_

1,445 posts

93 months

Friday 5th May 2017
quotequote all
You can't just 'drop a kerb' (assuming this is what you're doing all the way along you're frontage).

The footway is currently constructed to a footway specification, if you want to cross it in a vehicle you need to reconstruct it as a vehicular access. In Northamptonshire this is 150 sub base, 100 binder course and 20 surface course. Obviously if you just drop the kerb you're removing the existing material is it's going to be no where near the 270mm depth above.

There's also a nice scar in the footway so that should be fun. Need to be very careful with mechanical excavation because I bet it's no deeper than 300mm at the very most. Really want to break the surface off and hand dig.

For this I would be very surprised if you didn't have to get a license from the county council highways department, as it's their footway.

To drop the kerb for the full length, reconstruct the footway and the do your drive 100% how it should be done, 5k sounds cheap.

As as side note - probably best that you've got rid of the other bloke. Good luck in finding someone decent I'm sure it's a nightmare. Maybe see what contractors the local council use for their schemes, they have an interest in doing a proper job.

Adrian E

3,248 posts

177 months

Friday 5th May 2017
quotequote all
I'm looking at this at the moment as we have no off street parking

Surrey have guidance online which is actually quite straightforward to understand - I'd already established from Reigate BC that they didn't care what I did, so long as it was permeable/didn't drain onto the road. We don't actually have a kerb to drop, but the stones that mark the boundary edge of the road are owned by Surrey CC so we'll have to go through the process in order to make it 'official'

https://www.surreycc.gov.uk/roads-and-transport/ro...

Worth a read as I doubt the process will vary much, just the costs and processes involved.

liner33

10,701 posts

203 months

Friday 5th May 2017
quotequote all
Fireblade69 said:
In Brighton & Hove you have to use a contractor approved & licensed by the city council. For me, dropping the kerb & tarmacking 1 metre square of verge cost £1000 including licenses, permits, land searches - really. Had to get a letter from network rail even though the nearest track was 2 miles away!

From memory - Gas, Leccy, Water, BT, Virgin, Network Rail & Council were all contacted and needed to provide written approval stating they had no conflict. All bar 1 did it for nothing, can't remember who it was that charged - might have been Southern Water.
Our nextdoor neighbour wanted to move their access and we wanted a second driveway so went halves on the £1800 the council charged to do both areas at the same time. Didnt think it was too bad at all



V8 Fettler

7,019 posts

133 months

Friday 5th May 2017
quotequote all
wjwren said:
Great letter alfie!!



He has just called me! I had a rant and said

You never turn up or let me know, countless excuses as to why you cant come, poor quality of work, sending the blocks to my house without even lettign me know they are on the way, let alone they are not even paid for! He said he had money issues and didnt know why i was annoyed as i had to have the blocks anyway. I said i gave you the money for the blocks 3 weeks ago and you said ud bought them and had an invoice - phone went quiet. He said maybe he could of communicated better with me. He said he had been fined £50 by the merchants for a wasted deliver, i said no you havent as ive just spoken to them and the manager said you havent been in contact at all let alone any talk of a fine. He said they dont "fine" people.

He said check my fb page out loads of good reviews on there, i said they are all your friends. Line went quiet again.

He said have a think about it.

10 mins went and i got this text

Just forget it we have no trust get someone else to finish your drive we have no trust so get someone else in.


so to sum up, the bloke is a tosser, total liar/shyster and crap at his job.
Best to avoid basing any construction contract on trust.

alfie2244

11,292 posts

189 months

Friday 5th May 2017
quotequote all
V8 Fettler said:
Best to avoid basing any construction contract on trust.
http://www.rics.org/uk/shop/contracts/JCT-Contracts/

elanfan

5,521 posts

228 months

Friday 5th May 2017
quotequote all
If you intend to write a letter before action to reclaim part of your deposit it might encourage him a little if you were add something to the effect:

Do not misjudge me as I will follow this though and obtain a CCJ against you (as I have plenty of evidence) along with subsequent escalation to the High Court Bailiffs for recovery of the money. I will then make it my mission to leave appropriate reviews and feedback wherever I am able which I'm sure wouldn't be welcomed but it would be true. Alternatively, you can refund my money by return and without a fight and we can each chalk the whole sorry matter up to experience.

If he returns your money it's up to you whether you feel others need to be warned.

BlackLabel

13,251 posts

124 months

Friday 5th May 2017
quotequote all
I imagine the friend who recommended this shyster to OP will be feeling a bit guilty now (and a bit worried about the quality of his own drive).

C Lee Farquar

4,074 posts

217 months

Friday 5th May 2017
quotequote all
As m3jappa has said elsewhere the problem is that this is how most contractors lay block paving, 75mm depth of Type 1 is more than many use. It is, of course, why so many block paving drives sink. And as for 150mm below the DPC, very few bother.

The Op's original contractor probably thinks he's done nothing wrong and has a had a lucky escape.

Good luck trying to find someone at £4k who will do it absolutely by the book.

SmoothCriminal

5,073 posts

200 months

Friday 5th May 2017
quotequote all
Does the op need planning for his block front?

Does the op need planning for his dropped kerb?

Has the op got a detailed quote on paper this time?




Palmers

478 posts

112 months

Saturday 6th May 2017
quotequote all
By now, id have my deposit back, or be making myself a very big inconvenience. A £1,200 inconvenience...

whoami

13,151 posts

241 months

Saturday 6th May 2017
quotequote all
Palmers said:
By now, id have my deposit back, or be making myself a very big inconvenience. A £1,200 inconvenience...
How would you do that?

Palmers

478 posts

112 months

Saturday 6th May 2017
quotequote all
I can be a proper arse.

cossy400

3,166 posts

185 months

Saturday 6th May 2017
quotequote all
Palmers said:
I can be a proper arse.
But being an arse is nt going to make this bloke magic 1200 quid up as he sounds very poor.

Willy Nilly

12,511 posts

168 months

Saturday 6th May 2017
quotequote all
cossy400 said:
Palmers said:
I can be a proper arse.
But being an arse is nt going to make this bloke magic 1200 quid up as he sounds very poor.
He's probably due a nice inheritance from his dad though

DonkeyApple

55,545 posts

170 months

Saturday 6th May 2017
quotequote all
Willy Nilly said:
cossy400 said:
Palmers said:
I can be a proper arse.
But being an arse is nt going to make this bloke magic 1200 quid up as he sounds very poor.
He's probably due a nice inheritance from his dad though
It's further outlay having his father killed though. I don't think it's all that sensible a course of action.

The OP clearly doesn't want to square up to the first builder in any way or means sufficient to draw the best line under this. It is clear that he considers £1,200 to make that problem go away is fair. And with regards to the continued work it seems pretty clear that he doesn't want to pay market rate to have the job completely correctly or to go through the complexity and harshness of having a specified contract of works drawn up. It all paints a picture that if he were to hire a hitman to take out the builder's parents and possibly other siblings he'd probably pay £1,000 to some random from Wetherspoons and then sit there waiting for nothing to happen.

Sorry OP but you've tried to do it in the cheap once and it seems pretty clear that you want the second attempt to also be done below market rate. Sometimes you just need to do things properly.

Buzz84

1,148 posts

150 months

Saturday 6th May 2017
quotequote all
SmoothCriminal said:
Does the op need planning for his block front?
In this situation the builder was not constructing it to permeable standards as required since 2008. (Type 1 sub base and sand to lay the blocks on isn't classes as permeable)
So yes he would require planning permission.

hyphen

26,262 posts

91 months

Saturday 6th May 2017
quotequote all
I think you don't need planning if you stick a drain channel along the front, which tends to be the normal way its done.

m3jappa

6,446 posts

219 months

Saturday 6th May 2017
quotequote all
The government document was written so badly that nearly 10 years later people still do not understand it.

Heres the bottom line:

You only need planning permission if the run off water is run off onto the road or public drainage system.

Ultimately you need to retain your own rainwater. How you do this is up to you, you can either:

Have permeable paving. which has lots of drawbacks.

Have normal block paving/concrete/tarmac etc but it runs into a drain which then goes into a soak away, you are allowed an overflow from this into the drainage system.

Run the surface water to a 'rain garden' which is basically flower bed/lawn etc.

in reality literally no one bothers, i tell every customer and about 3 in ten care. The vast majority of companies fail to mention this, probably because they think it will lose them work. Especially when some other know it all comes round and convinces the customer its only for new drives (its not, its any area over 5m2 even if you replace like for like).