Any leeway with camera van speeds?
Discussion
HantsRat said:
jimaq said:
Nope, in Northumberland. And why should I provide proof?
Because so many people have posted on here about getting done 31/32 in a 30 and have never provided proof thus everyone thinks it's a myth as it basically never happens.mko9 said:
covboy said:
mko9 said:
The geometry between you and the van will also affect their reading. If your velocity vector is not pointed directly at the van, then the reading they received will be reduced. The more offset, the greater the reduction. Your velocity vector towards the camera is your real velocity x cosine of the offset angle.
I'm sure it's not that simple HantsRat said:
Well ACPO doesn't exist anymore.
OMG - its now a free for all for ambitious local Quangos and Richard Brunstrom wanabees in making their marks via a financially driven PowerPoint presentation sucking up to Whitehall that 'proves' speed crime? What's actually happened here - are all CPO's disbanded and running Speed Awareness Courses for 6 months and then lording it on a yacht for the other 6? Med Hughes (aka ex ACPO speeding Tzar nicked for 95 in a 60 ) is doing very well out of it all I hear...
Here's to proper road policing not this 4mph over BS extortion: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-40571699
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff