MET parking thieves

Author
Discussion

Jamesgt

Original Poster:

848 posts

233 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
MitchT said:
I recall something similar happening in my neck of the woods ... found the article:
http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/local/l...
The driver is right. They are patronising. Just admit the system is sh*t and leave people alone.

silverfoxcc

7,690 posts

145 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
James

sent you a PM

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
speedyguy said:
Jamesgt said:
OpulentBob said:
There are signs in the Starbucks car park specifically saying they will charge people who park there and use the Macdonalds. I was there about 3 hours ago. If you drive in to Starbucks, the spaces on the left hand side have the sign behind them. I read it from the car and thought of this thread.
Thanks for that. I've never bothered to read those signs. Reality is I didn't park over night in either car park. I've spoke to someone in work who says they have cctv for 6 months. This will show my car and me turning up to work at the time MET accuse me of settling in for the night at the car park.
Bob given what I think your line of work is if the OP follows the sign pictured (the small black and white one) from the A120, If he was parked 'on site' less than 2 hrs (doesn't sound like it though ?) I would have said the Starbucks sign is irrelevant, otherwise the OP could challenge Highways England under their policy and signing a facility that does not meet the requirements. Table B1 page 17 otherwise the Trunk road signing should come down.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/strateg...

Sorry, I missed this earlier. You raise a good point, the document clearly says that up to 2 hours free parking in the service area is mandatory if signed from the trunk road, which it clearly is.

I think it depends on whether the Starbucks is classed as part of the "service area", or whether service just means the petrol station. Is coffee a service?!

B28 of that document also may be applicable here, at a push.

The Starbucks sign does not conflict with Starbucks policy of 2 hours for Starbucks customers, I guess is their get out. If you use their facility, then you comply.

But yeah you could probably (maybe) make a case if you dug right down in to the regs and definitions etc, and could convince whoever that Starbucks is part of the same overall facility as the petrol station or Macs. Which, to a road user, they are.

Difficult one!

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

255 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
I dropped someone at the Radisson, next to the Stansted terminal building, and got an invoice for £100 for taking more than 10 minutes.

Bunch of bandits.


bad company

18,615 posts

266 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
I dropped someone at the Radisson, next to the Stansted terminal building, and got an invoice for £100 for taking more than 10 minutes.

Bunch of bandits.
Hope you didn't pay it?

SantaBarbara

3,244 posts

108 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
It costs two pounds at Stanstead just to drop someone off in the express car park

John Lennon airport is much better and cheaper

Jamesgt

Original Poster:

848 posts

233 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
OpulentBob said:
Sorry, I missed this earlier. You raise a good point, the document clearly says that up to 2 hours free parking in the service area is mandatory if signed from the trunk road, which it clearly is.

I think it depends on whether the Starbucks is classed as part of the "service area", or whether service just means the petrol station. Is coffee a service?!

B28 of that document also may be applicable here, at a push.

The Starbucks sign does not conflict with Starbucks policy of 2 hours for Starbucks customers, I guess is their get out. If you use their facility, then you comply.

But yeah you could probably (maybe) make a case if you dug right down in to the regs and definitions etc, and could convince whoever that Starbucks is part of the same overall facility as the petrol station or Macs. Which, to a road user, they are.

Difficult one!
I missed this also. Probably not relevant for my case but the petrol station at the services which includes M&S has recently installed PPC. They are giving you 30 minutes maximum. So this contravenes the 2 hours mandatory rest?

Jamesgt

Original Poster:

848 posts

233 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
silverfoxcc said:
James

sent you a PM
Cheers for that. I'm going to do my evidence collecting the next few days and write back over the weekend to both DRP and MET.

SantaBarbara

3,244 posts

108 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
Once you take that turn off, it takes forever to get back onto the M11

Jamesgt

Original Poster:

848 posts

233 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
SantaBarbara said:
It costs two pounds at Stanstead just to drop someone off in the express car park

John Lennon airport is much better and cheaper
I think it's all a con with these smaller airports. Gatwick and Heathrow are the main airports for the U.K. They manage to do a free drop off period.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
Jamesgt said:
OpulentBob said:
Sorry, I missed this earlier. You raise a good point, the document clearly says that up to 2 hours free parking in the service area is mandatory if signed from the trunk road, which it clearly is.

I think it depends on whether the Starbucks is classed as part of the "service area", or whether service just means the petrol station. Is coffee a service?!

B28 of that document also may be applicable here, at a push.

The Starbucks sign does not conflict with Starbucks policy of 2 hours for Starbucks customers, I guess is their get out. If you use their facility, then you comply.

But yeah you could probably (maybe) make a case if you dug right down in to the regs and definitions etc, and could convince whoever that Starbucks is part of the same overall facility as the petrol station or Macs. Which, to a road user, they are.

Difficult one!
I missed this also. Probably not relevant for my case but the petrol station at the services which includes M&S has recently installed PPC. They are giving you 30 minutes maximum. So this contravenes the 2 hours mandatory rest?
I would say so, without further digging. There is no doubt that the services sign sends you there, i don't think HA/HE could make them increase the waiting time but I imagine they would look at removing the sign. It's a niche piece of technicality but it's clear, in my interpretation.

Caveats are whether or not the reference document has been superseded, which I don't think it has, and whether the Sec of State has issued a departure from standard for it. Very restrictive waiting times are very common in airport areas so I'd be surprised if it hadn't come up before.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
PS as your case is over 2 hrs it's prob inapplicable as you say but def worth using as a defence if anyone else is in the situation, I would say. You can reasonably expect the services to offer what the regulations dictate, no matter how obscure the regulations. The regs are there for a reason smile

Be good to hear from a legal eagle what their opinion would be if it went to court or some sort of trubunal?

Red Devil

13,060 posts

208 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
OpulentBob said:
Jamesgt said:
OpulentBob said:
Sorry, I missed this earlier. You raise a good point, the document clearly says that up to 2 hours free parking in the service area is mandatory if signed from the trunk road, which it clearly is.

I think it depends on whether the Starbucks is classed as part of the "service area", or whether service just means the petrol station. Is coffee a service?!

B28 of that document also may be applicable here, at a push.

The Starbucks sign does not conflict with Starbucks policy of 2 hours for Starbucks customers, I guess is their get out. If you use their facility, then you comply.

But yeah you could probably (maybe) make a case if you dug right down in to the regs and definitions etc, and could convince whoever that Starbucks is part of the same overall facility as the petrol station or Macs. Which, to a road user, they are.

Difficult one!
I missed this also. Probably not relevant for my case but the petrol station at the services which includes M&S has recently installed PPC. They are giving you 30 minutes maximum. So this contravenes the 2 hours mandatory rest?
I would say so, without further digging. There is no doubt that the services sign sends you there, i don't think HA/HE could make them increase the waiting time but I imagine they would look at removing the sign. It's a niche piece of technicality but it's clear, in my interpretation.

Caveats are whether or not the reference document has been superseded, which I don't think it has, and whether the Sec of State has issued a departure from standard for it. Very restrictive waiting times are very common in airport areas so I'd be surprised if it hadn't come up before.
For B28 to apply the operator would have to demonstrate to the SoS that a variation to the existing agreement per B26 Schedule 1 is justified.
I was under the impression that the time limit (whatever it may be) applies to the entire site. I wasn't aware that the operator can cherry pick parts of it.

I was at Birchanger services a couple of months ago. It never occurred to me to look at the signage as I knew I wouldn't be stopping for anywhere near two hours.
Will need to give it the full Mk1 eyeball next time I'm there. smile
.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
The garage owner won't have a say in it. When the sign went in, the services had a 2hr limit so the sign was correctly placed by the HA.

Since it's changed to 30mins, there are 2 options:

Either the HA/HE are unaware, in which case when they realise/get a report, they will act on;

Or they know, and have allowed it to stay by putting in the request to the SoS, on the basis that it's not really a truck stop, and will fill up with taxis etc (worded far more eloquently obvs) and been awarded a departure to allow the sign to stay, rather than to make the garage allow 2hrs.

Disclaimer: I was actually one of the designers of the new road, must have designed that sign, but I'm buggered if I can remember anything about it now rofl

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
OpulentBob said:
The garage owner won't have a say in it. When the sign went in, the services had a 2hr limit so the sign was correctly placed by the HA.

Since it's changed to 30mins, there are 2 options:

Either the HA/HE are unaware, in which case when they realise/get a report, they will act on;

Or they know, and have allowed it to stay by putting in the request to the SoS, on the basis that it's not really a truck stop, and will fill up with taxis etc (worded far more eloquently obvs) and been awarded a departure to allow the sign to stay, rather than to make the garage allow 2hrs.

Disclaimer: I was actually one of the designers of the new road, must have designed that sign, but I'm buggered if I can remember anything about it now rofl
Bob and Red devil smile
There has been no authorisation from the SofS or HE for these or any services. But it is only policy technically the signage should come down from the road network.
The TRSA (trunk road service area) signing is a mess/muddle as it has been neglected for years many of the signage is legacy and much of it is unlawful now. Transport focus (who haven't got a scoobies) wanted it looking at. I went to a meeting about it in Area 3 in December, then handed my notice in the following week. (Ex Highways England Policy advisor, Roadside facilities wink ) ps Bob do you know Graham H ?

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
I feel like I should but I don't think I do... I left that side of things years ago though, lost touch with many people...

xjay1337

15,966 posts

118 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
Op please listen the advice given.

Foliage

3,861 posts

122 months

Thursday 24th August 2017
quotequote all
S11Steve said:
How would you combat selfish drivers if you were a landowner though? Let's assume you cannot put a physical barrier in place.
A barrier, anpr on entry, receipt scan and anpr on exit, over stay or no receipt and get charged an appropriate amount, £10 an hour or whatever, put your card in the barrier and get your car out. Don't pay, cant get out.

SantaBarbara

3,244 posts

108 months

Thursday 24th August 2017
quotequote all
Jamesgt said:
I think it's all a con with these smaller airports. Gatwick and Heathrow are the main airports for the U.K. They manage to do a free drop off period.
No, Gatwick and Heathrow are airports in the South East of England only

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

255 months

Thursday 24th August 2017
quotequote all
bad company said:
mybrainhurts said:
I dropped someone at the Radisson, next to the Stansted terminal building, and got an invoice for £100 for taking more than 10 minutes.

Bunch of bandits.
Hope you didn't pay it?
No, a stern word with the hotel fixed the bandits.