Illegal for landlord to refuse on food preference?
Discussion
WinstonWolf said:
Gavia said:
Breadvan72 said:
A coda to the story -
https://www.somersetlive.co.uk/news/somerset-news/...
https://www.somersetlive.co.uk/news/somerset-news/...
Excellent workhttps://www.somersetlive.co.uk/news/somerset-news/...
https://www.somersetlive.co.uk/news/somerset-news/...
Please post this in NP&E and watch them explode at the whole thing. I would, but sadly I’m no longer able to post there after a concerted effort from the Alt Right freedom of speech supporters, who en masse reported me to get me banned
Gavia said:
WinstonWolf said:
Gavia said:
Breadvan72 said:
A coda to the story -
https://www.somersetlive.co.uk/news/somerset-news/...
https://www.somersetlive.co.uk/news/somerset-news/...
Excellent workhttps://www.somersetlive.co.uk/news/somerset-news/...
https://www.somersetlive.co.uk/news/somerset-news/...
Please post this in NP&E and watch them explode at the whole thing. I would, but sadly I’m no longer able to post there after a concerted effort from the Alt Right freedom of speech supporters, who en masse reported me to get me banned
It matters not whether or not Mr H was or is a t
t - the point was that his freedom of speech was being threatened by someone seeking to misuse the court system for this purpose.
It is theoretically possible to have a case struck out without a hearing, but this rarely happens.
Wilson was represented by a hapless young woman working on a low paid gig basis for a company which is a sort of Uber of the legal system, sending unqualified advocates to court. She had an impossible gig. The Judge was unimpressed by Wilson's failure to show up at court.
t - the point was that his freedom of speech was being threatened by someone seeking to misuse the court system for this purpose. It is theoretically possible to have a case struck out without a hearing, but this rarely happens.
Wilson was represented by a hapless young woman working on a low paid gig basis for a company which is a sort of Uber of the legal system, sending unqualified advocates to court. She had an impossible gig. The Judge was unimpressed by Wilson's failure to show up at court.
Breadvan72 said:
It matters not whether or not Mr H was or is a tt - the point was that his freedom of speech was being threatened by someone seeking to misuse the court system for this purpose.
It is theoretically possible to have a case struck out without a hearing, but this rarely happens.
Wilson was represented by a hapless young woman working on a low paid gig basis for a company which is a sort of Uber of the legal system, sending unqualified advocates to court. She had an impossible gig. The Judge was unimpressed by Wilson's failure to show up at court.
It is a shame that this supposed 'Freedom of Speech' has become so subjective such that the parameters within which it operates are now dictated by political whim and which way the wind is blowing.t - the point was that his freedom of speech was being threatened by someone seeking to misuse the court system for this purpose. It is theoretically possible to have a case struck out without a hearing, but this rarely happens.
Wilson was represented by a hapless young woman working on a low paid gig basis for a company which is a sort of Uber of the legal system, sending unqualified advocates to court. She had an impossible gig. The Judge was unimpressed by Wilson's failure to show up at court.
cmaguire said:
It is a shame that this supposed 'Freedom of Speech' has become so subjective such that the parameters within which it operates are now dictated by political whim and which way the wind is blowing.
That is only true in the minds of tabloid readers and NPE whyohwhyohwhyists. The reality is that freedom of speech survives and is legally protected, although extremists of all kinds attack it. Edited by anonymous-user on Wednesday 21st February 21:49
Breadvan72 said:
It is theoretically possible to have a case struck out without a hearing, but this rarely happens.
Wilson was represented by a hapless young woman working on a low paid gig basis for a company which is a sort of Uber of the legal system, sending unqualified advocates to court. She had an impossible gig. The Judge was unimpressed by Wilson's failure to show up at court.
Thanks for clarifying. Wilson was represented by a hapless young woman working on a low paid gig basis for a company which is a sort of Uber of the legal system, sending unqualified advocates to court. She had an impossible gig. The Judge was unimpressed by Wilson's failure to show up at court.
It's a nice David and Goliath story where David where you were the stone.
Breadvan72 said:
cmaguire said:
It is a shame that this supposed 'Freedom of Speech' has become so subjective such that the parameters within which it operates are now dictated by political whim and which way the wind is blowing.
That is only true in the minds of tabloid readers and NPE whyohwhyohwhyists. The reality is that freedom of speech survives and is legally protected, although extremists of all kinds attack it. Edited by Breadvan72 on Wednesday 21st February 21:49
There are many things said openly and freely 30 years ago that could very easily result in prosecution now, and they are opinions and views rather than incitement of any kind. And whilst some views expressed freely back then may well be unreasonable under scrutiny, the reality now is that certain subjects are not now open for free discussion as those that feel they have the moral high ground shout everyone else down with accusations of racism or bigotry.
Meanwhile those self same moralists can tout their propaganda without scrutiny. Welcome to the age of enlightenment.
Breadvan72 said:
Cheers, but Alfas are too spenner for me these days.
I add that a ban from NPE is surely a highly desirable prize and a great benefit to sanity and the soul.
It is actually quite refreshing and ensures that I no longer have to risk being dragged down to their level by the terminally stupid. I can instead play my own game of just being an idiot all on my own. I add that a ban from NPE is surely a highly desirable prize and a great benefit to sanity and the soul.
Edited by Breadvan72 on Wednesday 21st February 20:44
cmaguire said:
I doubt we'll agree on that.
There are many things said openly and freely 30 years ago that could very easily result in prosecution now, and they are opinions and views rather than incitement of any kind. And whilst some views expressed freely back then may well be unreasonable under scrutiny, the reality now is that certain subjects are not now open for free discussion as those that feel they have the moral high ground shout everyone else down with accusations of racism or bigotry.
Meanwhile those self same moralists can tout their propaganda without scrutiny. Welcome to the age of enlightenment.
That post makes you sound like a racist and an apologist, just so you know.There are many things said openly and freely 30 years ago that could very easily result in prosecution now, and they are opinions and views rather than incitement of any kind. And whilst some views expressed freely back then may well be unreasonable under scrutiny, the reality now is that certain subjects are not now open for free discussion as those that feel they have the moral high ground shout everyone else down with accusations of racism or bigotry.
Meanwhile those self same moralists can tout their propaganda without scrutiny. Welcome to the age of enlightenment.
I'm sure you're not, but as someone with no interest in getting involved in the discussion, I just thought you'd like to know how you're coming across.
cmaguire said:
I doubt we'll agree on that.
There are many things said openly and freely 30 years ago that could very easily result in prosecution now, and they are opinions and views rather than incitement of any kind. And whilst some views expressed freely back then may well be unreasonable under scrutiny, the reality now is that certain subjects are not now open for free discussion as those that feel they have the moral high ground shout everyone else down with accusations of racism or bigotry.
Meanwhile those self same moralists can tout their propaganda without scrutiny. Welcome to the age of enlightenment.
Didn't we do this last week...?There are many things said openly and freely 30 years ago that could very easily result in prosecution now, and they are opinions and views rather than incitement of any kind. And whilst some views expressed freely back then may well be unreasonable under scrutiny, the reality now is that certain subjects are not now open for free discussion as those that feel they have the moral high ground shout everyone else down with accusations of racism or bigotry.
Meanwhile those self same moralists can tout their propaganda without scrutiny. Welcome to the age of enlightenment.
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Bacon Is Proof said:
That post makes you sound like a racist and an apologist, just so you know.
I'm sure you're not, but as someone with no interest in getting involved in the discussion, I just thought you'd like to know how you're coming across.
Yes, we definitely did that bit...I'm sure you're not, but as someone with no interest in getting involved in the discussion, I just thought you'd like to know how you're coming across.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff