Excessive speeding fine

Author
Discussion

JoBlack

143 posts

81 months

Friday 24th November 2017
quotequote all
The Mad Monk said:
Who or what is 'dindu'?
"din'du nuffink. I'm a promisin' footballer innit.'

A generic slur to refer to a class of individuals who seem to perpetually at the scenes of crimes or caught red-handed yet claim to be perfectly innocent passers-by routinely harassed by the authorities. Usually have starring roles in various TV series narrated by the likes of Vinny Jones.

The frustration comes from the fact they have an army of do-gooder social services types who seem to keep them from ever facing the consequences of their social pariahdom and the normal law-abiding tax payers who fund them get bent over for the slightest transgression from the increasingly orwellian levels of rules applied to 'party members' with no apparant rule of law applicable to the 'proles' because it's seemingly accepted they are too thick to understand laws and should be exscused from compliance.




Edited by JoBlack on Friday 24th November 22:26

mickmcpaddy

1,445 posts

106 months

Friday 24th November 2017
quotequote all
How many nuffins did a dindu do if a dindu dindu nuffin?

The Mad Monk

10,474 posts

118 months

Friday 24th November 2017
quotequote all
JoBlack said:
The Mad Monk said:
Who or what is 'dindu'?
"din'du nuffink. I'm a promisin' footballer innit.'

A generic slur to refer to a class of individuals who seem to perpetually at the scenes of crimes or caught red-handed yet claim to be perfectly innocent passers-by routinely harassed by the authorities. Usually have starring roles in various TV series narrated by the likes of Vinny Jones.

The frustration comes from the fact they have an army of do-gooder social services types who seem to keep them from ever facing the consequences of their social pariahdom and the normal law-abiding tax payers who fund them get bent over for the slightest transgression from the increasingly orwellian levels of rules applied to 'party members' with no apparant rule of law applicable to the 'proles' because it's seemingly accepted they are too thick to understand laws and should be exscused from compliance.




Edited by JoBlack on Friday 24th November 22:26
Thank you very much.

JoBlack

143 posts

81 months

Friday 24th November 2017
quotequote all
mickmcpaddy said:
How many nuffins did a dindu do if a dindu dindu nuffin?
dindu wants 179 prior nuffins to be taken into consideration in addition to the nuffin he dindu before he dindu nuffin.

agtlaw

6,713 posts

207 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
Because of further incompetence by court staff, this took longer than expected but I have now dealt with this case.

OP's fine was reduced by £1809.

WinstonWolf

72,857 posts

240 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
Because of further incompetence by court staff, this took longer than expected but I have now dealt with this case.

OP's fine was reduced by £1809.
Well that's bloody brilliant! thumbup

jwo

984 posts

250 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
Great result by agtlaw. (who's services I thought I may have needed earlier in the year - but fortunately not...!)

But it is disgusting the incompetence shown by the legal system in the case - the clerk of the court should have been up on what the sentencing should have been..

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

187 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
Because of further incompetence by court staff, this took longer than expected but I have now dealt with this case.

OP's fine was reduced by £1809.
rofl at the people telling the OP to suck it. Great result.

Driver101

14,376 posts

122 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
agtlaw said:
Because of further incompetence by court staff, this took longer than expected but I have now dealt with this case.

OP's fine was reduced by £1809.
rofl at the people telling the OP to suck it. Great result.
It's often the response on here as if £xxxx is just loose pocket change not worth bothering about.

Great outcome.

Sheepshanks

32,816 posts

120 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
Because of further incompetence by court staff, this took longer than expected but I have now dealt with this case.

OP's fine was reduced by £1809.
Nice one.

Any explanation as to why they got it so wrong in the first place? I can understand the Mags messing up, but isn't the Clerk supposed to know this stuff?

paintman

7,694 posts

191 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
Because of further incompetence by court staff, this took longer than expected but I have now dealt with this case.

OP's fine was reduced by £1809.
Very well done.
Have a virtual pint drink

T6 vanman

3,067 posts

100 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+1


AGTLAW & BV

Stout99

1,860 posts

117 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
Good shot!
They should indeed have got the fine right in the first place.

As far as declaring income is concerned, I have seen millionaire businessmen who were driving £120k+ cars with £30k number plates declare £0 income and minimum wage and walk out of court with fines based on those falsehoods. Equally I have seen magistrates not being taken in by blatant attempts like that and fined appropriately. Perhaps if magistrates get a suspicion that speedy-rich-guy is taking the pi55 appropriate investigations should follow.

Happy Christmas OP

The Mad Monk

10,474 posts

118 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
T6 vanman said:
The head should be covered when saluting.

When saluting the palm of the hand should be vertical.

paintman

7,694 posts

191 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
The Mad Monk said:
When saluting the palm of the hand should be vertical.
Perhaps it's a sailor....


anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
The Mad Monk said:
T6 vanman said:
The head should be covered when saluting.

When saluting the palm of the hand should be vertical.
(1) Yes. (Hence "my office, your hat" as a prelude to a bking, apparently)

(2) Not in the Navy.

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
paintman said:
Perhaps it's a sailor....
Oooh, hope so! [/Julian and Sandy]

Stout99

1,860 posts

117 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
The Mad Monk said:
T6 vanman said:
The head should be covered when saluting.

When saluting the palm of the hand should be vertical.
Not for the senior service.

Mr Dendrite

2,316 posts

211 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Oooh, hope so! [/Julian and Sandy]
BV72 now trading as Bona law?

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 22nd December 2017
quotequote all
Vada the ecaf on her.