TV licensing (Capita) impersonating police officers?

TV licensing (Capita) impersonating police officers?

Author
Discussion

TwistingMyMelon

6,385 posts

205 months

Saturday 9th February 2019
quotequote all
Can anyone summarise what he is alleging ?

I tried watching it , but gave up after 10 seconds as I couldn't stand his smug, gloating , whingeing narsastic face for any longer.

SmoothCriminal

5,061 posts

199 months

Saturday 9th February 2019
quotequote all
The BBC are a scummy leftist organisation that peddles it's "impartiality" but is no better than red top tabloid scum, at least with the tabloids you know what you are getting.

Liberal cancer at it's finest.

Shuvi McTupya

24,460 posts

247 months

Saturday 9th February 2019
quotequote all
TwistingMyMelon said:
Can anyone summarise what he is alleging ?

I tried watching it , but gave up after 10 seconds as I couldn't stand his smug, gloating , whingeing narsastic face for any longer.
I already did, when i posted about it!



ChocolateFrog

25,410 posts

173 months

Saturday 9th February 2019
quotequote all
While not as blatant as some broadcasters there can't be anyone left who truly believes the BBC is impartial.

Atleast the others don't try and pretend they're not politically biased.

BertBert

19,059 posts

211 months

Saturday 9th February 2019
quotequote all
They are definitely impartial and certainly not biased politically.
Bert

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 9th February 2019
quotequote all
BertBert said:
They are definitely impartial and certainly not biased politically.
Bert
laugh Yep and I have 5 unicorns in the garden!

chunder27

2,309 posts

208 months

Saturday 9th February 2019
quotequote all
The key word in all this stuff is IF, if you possess, if you watch.

I watched a thing on youtube form a guy who is prominent on this, and who has been asked by the Beeb numerous times to drop his page.

Something to do with a by law, and that is if anyone presumes you have broken the law with no proof that you HAVE, no sort of judgement can be made.

That is conveniently forgotten about.

All they need is your name if they visit, that is ALL, They know your address. but simply say, "i do not wish to speak to you" They know the drill and will usually just walk away, seen scores of videos of the this.

If you engage them, they will use that against you with this stupid warrant stuff.

Watch the Daily Mail video about the boss form Capita telling the undercover guy how it works, 28 convictions (he even uses that sort of pathetic wording) a week, then you start getting bonuses.

it is a total lie as are detector vans (no conviction has ever been made using van data).

Anyone who can do this, you know is not worth paying, it is the wool that has been pulled over the countries eyes for decades. And it is based on fake and unproveable law.

Shuvi McTupya

24,460 posts

247 months

Saturday 9th February 2019
quotequote all
chunder27 said:
it is a total lie as are detector vans (no conviction has ever been made using van data).
I have only ever seen one 'detector van' It had a big sticker on it saying what it was but it was just a mini bus to carry staff around!

Mojooo

12,734 posts

180 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
Pistonheads doesn't hatet he working class, just check out the 'Council' thread!

98elise

26,626 posts

161 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
Shuvi McTupya said:
chunder27 said:
it is a total lie as are detector vans (no conviction has ever been made using van data).
I have only ever seen one 'detector van' It had a big sticker on it saying what it was but it was just a mini bus to carry staff around!
In the military during my electronic warfare training we were shown how a TV signal could be detected, and how to block the detection.

It was surprisingly easy to detect and didn't need a van full of gear.

I don't know if the BBC ever had detector vans, but it's certainly possible to detect what channel someone was watching in a particular house.

This was old CRT TV's. The same method would not be possible on a modern TV.

red997

1,304 posts

209 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
was possible, with crt sets
not possible now

AdeTuono

7,254 posts

227 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
oyster said:
A whole year’s access to the widest range of multi-channel programming for the price of a nice meal out.

It’s the best bargain in most peoples’ lives.
I've just received an invoice from a restaurant down the road, for a meal I didn't eat. When I questioned them, they said that it was there if I wanted it.

Should I pay?

Graveworm

8,496 posts

71 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
AdeTuono said:
I've just received an invoice from a restaurant down the road, for a meal I didn't eat. When I questioned them, they said that it was there if I wanted it.

Should I pay?
I have never used a national health hospital. state funded education nor received any benefits. Yet my taxes and NI contributions have nothing to do with that, nor should they.

BertBert

19,059 posts

211 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
AdeTuono said:
I've just received an invoice from a restaurant down the road, for a meal I didn't eat. When I questioned them, they said that it was there if I wanted it.

Should I pay?
Again, not a very good analogy. If you ate it then yes, if not, then no.

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
ChocolateFrog said:
While not as blatant as some broadcasters there can't be anyone left who truly believes the BBC is impartial.

Atleast the others don't try and pretend they're not politically biased.
Most of the very left wing friends I have absolutely hate the BBC as they all say it is just a right wing mouthpiece, the voice of the Tories, all that kind of thing.

They aren’t alone either. There are numerous left wing commentators and journalists that are furious over the right-wing bias show by the BBC.

On the other hand, many people are annoyed by the apparent left-wing bias of the BBC.

If you have both the left and the right accusing the BBC of bias, then they probably aren’t too far from being impartial.

Shuvi McTupya

24,460 posts

247 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
Lord Marylebone said:
If you have both the left and the right accusing the BBC of bias, then they probably aren’t too far from being impartial.
Yeah i do find that weird. I only seem to hear the left wing bias. In my mind, they accuse everyone who expresses an opinion they don't like as being far, or extreme right. I have not noticed them labeling any groups as far, or extreme left. Maybe they do though and i just don't hear it.

AdeTuono

7,254 posts

227 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
BertBert said:
AdeTuono said:
I've just received an invoice from a restaurant down the road, for a meal I didn't eat. When I questioned them, they said that it was there if I wanted it.

Should I pay?
Again, not a very good analogy. If you ate it then yes, if not, then no.
It's a perfect analogy. I continue to get demands to pay for TV viewing, but I don't watch it, so I don't pay.

BertBert

19,059 posts

211 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
AdeTuono said:
BertBert said:
AdeTuono said:
I've just received an invoice from a restaurant down the road, for a meal I didn't eat. When I questioned them, they said that it was there if I wanted it.

Should I pay?
Again, not a very good analogy. If you ate it then yes, if not, then no.
It's a perfect analogy. I continue to get demands to pay for TV viewing, but I don't watch it, so I don't pay.
It's ok if you remove the second sentence. It implies that it somehow has a bearing on whether you should pay or not.
The problem is that it's open to huge fraud. If all the people who watched it paid for it, it would be fine. But they won't which is why there is legislation. Now I don't agree with the way the bbc is funded, nor the antics of Capita. But it's really straightforward. Don't get the benefit, don't pay. Very simple indeed!
Bert

PF62

3,637 posts

173 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
AdeTuono said:
BertBert said:
AdeTuono said:
I've just received an invoice from a restaurant down the road, for a meal I didn't eat. When I questioned them, they said that it was there if I wanted it.

Should I pay?
Again, not a very good analogy. If you ate it then yes, if not, then no.
It's a perfect analogy. I continue to get demands to pay for TV viewing, but I don't watch it, so I don't pay.
Although you listen to the BBC radio service funded by the licence - https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
PF62 said:
Although you listen to the BBC radio service funded by the licence - https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Crack on with just a radio licence then, I'll stick to commercial and Spotify etc.
And yup I binned my licence and got a refund last year as well as writing to my MP over how shoddily and dishonestly someone who I knew with MH issues was treated by Crapita and dragged thru court.
You can shove the licence fee where the sun doesn't shine.
I watched little tv before, now I watch even less and none of it live or iPlayer, if I want to watch planet earth etc it's on Prime.