Insurance cancelled after 1 week

Insurance cancelled after 1 week

Author
Discussion

HarveyM

Original Poster:

154 posts

173 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
Gavia said:
Have you seen her feedback from the latest policy?
No - just been trying to address the cancellation.

Gavia said:
Plus your comment is likely to just send this off on a tangent and start to prompt others to see you as a troll
Apologies all. Not looking to de-rail. Just grateful that her driving being monitored has avoided the risk of an even worse outcome.

HarveyM

Original Poster:

154 posts

173 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
davek_964 said:
My girlfriend's daughter works for an insurance company (broker) and I believe they specialise in people who have history that makes them 'difficult' to insure.
I'll find out who they are / contact number. Don't know if it will be any use but might be worth a phone call.
Yes, please. All advice and suggestions welcome.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,370 posts

150 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
InitialDave said:
super7 said:
Her last policy was cancelled by the insurers
super7 said:
If you get a letter through the post/phone call/email from your insurer saying your policy is being cancelled..... it's being cancelled!
Can't have both.
No, he's definitely right. I said I was going to murder my neighbour. But he topped himself the day before I was going to do it. So if I'm ever asked if I've murdered someone, the answer is YES. Obvious really!

rolleyes

hairyben

8,516 posts

183 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
Gavia said:
super7 said:
You don't need to be bleeding edge to send a file everyday of people with cancelled policies!

And you don't need to be bleeding edge to be able to receive it and use it....

Do you think these insurers are all running in the past. They have been at this for years!
What do they do with that file? What format should it be sent in? Who do you send it to? How do they upload it into their system? Is there someone who turns it around within minutes of receipt? Getting data is one thing, making it viable to use effectively is completely different.

Most insurers have multiple IT systems that struggle to talk to each other, let alone integrating the external databases without adding operational friction and cost into the processes.
when the building trade had "blacklists" of people considered troublemakers it was all handled by a outside "consultant." I think firms just paid the consultant for "services rendered" and sent in lists of names to be shared. This was something that only came to light a few years ago, after many years of industry rumours being scoffed at and considered a bit conspiracy-theory.

If we take the OP at face value then do we have to assume that something similar is in operation?

There is surely no means by which insurers could exchange this info and meet their data protection obligations? In fact the cancellation seems unfair and legally questionable, the "marker" grossly so, surely an instruction to seek driver improvement would be the first action?

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
super7 said:
Should look into the CUE database.......
One of the companies I invested in subscribes and contributes to CUE.

It didn't hold this information the last time I looked, but I am not at the sharp end.

It's a bit off piste for CUE to hold this information.

Gavia

7,627 posts

91 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
hairyben said:
Gavia said:
super7 said:
You don't need to be bleeding edge to send a file everyday of people with cancelled policies!

And you don't need to be bleeding edge to be able to receive it and use it....

Do you think these insurers are all running in the past. They have been at this for years!
What do they do with that file? What format should it be sent in? Who do you send it to? How do they upload it into their system? Is there someone who turns it around within minutes of receipt? Getting data is one thing, making it viable to use effectively is completely different.

Most insurers have multiple IT systems that struggle to talk to each other, let alone integrating the external databases without adding operational friction and cost into the processes.
when the building trade had "blacklists" of people considered troublemakers it was all handled by a outside "consultant." I think firms just paid the consultant for "services rendered" and sent in lists of names to be shared. This was something that only came to light a few years ago, after many years of industry rumours being scoffed at and considered a bit conspiracy-theory.

If we take the OP at face value then do we have to assume that something similar is in operation?

There is surely no means by which insurers could exchange this info and meet their data protection obligations? In fact the cancellation seems unfair and legally questionable, the "marker" grossly so, surely an instruction to seek driver improvement would be the first action?
That sounds great, I’m sure that an outside consultant could handle the multiple millions of requests sent each year without any problem, after all every single quotation generated by every single insurer and price comparison website will need running through this instantly so that the online quote system can either quote or decline. No cost at all there and zero operational friction either.

creampuff

6,511 posts

143 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
The Mad Monk said:
Oh dear.

"Where do we go from here?"

Perhaps suggest to your daughter that she sorts it out herself, because she is an adult and it really isn't your problem.
I take it that you are infact a genuine, real life, monumental retard.

Also at 17, she is not an adult. Helps to get facts correct if you are going to post.

Red Devil

13,060 posts

208 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
HarveyM said:
Adrian Flux insurance was Trinity Lane.
Auto Saints is Markerstudy.

Notification of cancellation this time was verbal, and apparently the agent said that “on suspension” was the same as “cancelled” and wouldn’t hear otherwise.

Kids. Who’d have ‘em? rolleyes
They are cheap for a reason. Just wait until you have to make a claim...
That's when you find out the true value of what you're paying for.
Although it may not seem like it, they may have done her a favour

HarveyM

Original Poster:

154 posts

173 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
No, he's definitely right. I said I was going to murder my neighbour. But he topped himself the day before I was going to do it. So if I'm ever asked if I've murdered someone, the answer is YES. Obvious really!

rolleyes
I tried that line of argument. They just kept repeating that notice of future cancellation counts as a forced cancellation.

You’d better hand yourself in for that murder you are intending to commit [/MinorityReport]

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
Gavia said:
That sounds great, I’m sure that an outside consultant could handle the multiple millions of requests sent each year without any problem, after all every single quotation generated by every single insurer and price comparison website will need running through this instantly so that the online quote system can either quote or decline. No cost at all there and zero operational friction either.
Insurance Initiatives did just that - hundreds of millions of transactions a year. Got sold for brewster's millions not so long ago.

Nobody I am aware of checks a "database" for cancelled policies. We've designed and built our own quote system so would sign up to such a database if it was there.


Gavia

7,627 posts

91 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
desolate said:
Insurance Initiatives did just that - hundreds of millions of transactions a year. Got sold for brewster's millions not so long ago.

Nobody I am aware of checks a "database" for cancelled policies. We've designed and built our own quote system so would sign up to such a database if it was there.
They still need a database to check, which doesn’t exist. Equally motor insurance is far more difficult to “police”, look at the difficulties they’ve had trying to create an NCD one. It’s one thing to design a database, another to get insurers to sign up to it and then an even bigger one to get them to maintain it accurately. GIGO is one of main the challenges here, alongside insurers not wanting to add cost and friction into their processes.

I know you’ve got your own quote engine, but most insurers have multiple quote and claims systems, all of which are cannibalised versions of other systems. Equally, the queues for IT enhancements are ususallly Howard’s of months and often things get bumped. I can’t see this being a huge priority for the large motor insurers.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,370 posts

150 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
HarveyM said:
I tried that line of argument. They just kept repeating that notice of future cancellation counts as a forced cancellation.
Any insurance company is perfectly entitled to insure or refuse to insure whoever they like. But what they have said is wrong.

The question they ask is if you've ever had a policy cancelled. Not if you've ever cancelled a policy. She'd never had a policy cancelled. She was about to, but it didn't happen.

hairyben

8,516 posts

183 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
Gavia said:
That sounds great, I’m sure that an outside consultant could handle the multiple millions of requests sent each year without any problem, after all every single quotation generated by every single insurer and price comparison website will need running through this instantly so that the online quote system can either quote or decline. No cost at all there and zero operational friction either.
well, it wasn't instant was it.

Perhaps my example is not the model by which this could work, but it's an example of data sharing - so elusive that the idea of its existence was ridiculed - did work for years, undetected.

"I can't personally visualise how it would work" doesn't make it impossible.

Gavia

7,627 posts

91 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
hairyben said:
well, it wasn't instant was it.

Perhaps my example is not the model by which this could work, but it's an example of data sharing - so elusive that the idea of its existence was ridiculed - did work for years, undetected.

"I can't personally visualise how it would work" doesn't make it impossible.
Not forgetting, massively illegal.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
Gavia said:
They still need a database to check, which doesn’t exist. Equally motor insurance is far more difficult to “police”, look at the difficulties they’ve had trying to create an NCD one. It’s one thing to design a database, another to get insurers to sign up to it and then an even bigger one to get them to maintain it accurately. GIGO is one of main the challenges here, alongside insurers not wanting to add cost and friction into their processes.

I know you’ve got your own quote engine, but most insurers have multiple quote and claims systems, all of which are cannibalised versions of other systems. Equally, the queues for IT enhancements are ususallly Howard’s of months and often things get bumped. I can’t see this being a huge priority for the large motor insurers.
I completely agree.
I am prettt sure it isn't happening but I can't be 100% certain.

They can't even agree on the DVLA data and at least one company shovels so much st into CUE we have to disregard them

The Mad Monk

10,474 posts

117 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
creampuff said:
I take it that you are infact a genuine, real life, monumental retard.

Also at 17, she is not an adult. Helps to get facts correct if you are going to post.
Bit harsh?

HarveyM

Original Poster:

154 posts

173 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
Any insurance company is perfectly entitled to insure or refuse to insure whoever they like. But what they have said is wrong.

The question they ask is if you've ever had a policy cancelled. Not if you've ever cancelled a policy. She'd never had a policy cancelled. She was about to, but it didn't happen.
I’ve been reading these forums long enough to respect the quality of your knowledge and advice. Just a shame that Auto Saint doesn’t share the same view. I would have sought to escalate to have a robust argument with someone about their phrasing but as I mentioned before, I’m not directly party to the contract.

davek_964

8,818 posts

175 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
HarveyM said:
davek_964 said:
My girlfriend's daughter works for an insurance company (broker) and I believe they specialise in people who have history that makes them 'difficult' to insure.
I'll find out who they are / contact number. Don't know if it will be any use but might be worth a phone call.
Yes, please. All advice and suggestions welcome.
First Insurance : 01344 286194. Ask for Amy Park if you get a chance.

Apparently they specialise in drivers with convictions, but you never know - maybe they can help.

Ninja59

3,691 posts

112 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
Gavia said:
They still need a database to check, which doesn’t exist. Equally motor insurance is far more difficult to “police”, look at the difficulties they’ve had trying to create an NCD one. It’s one thing to design a database, another to get insurers to sign up to it and then an even bigger one to get them to maintain it accurately. GIGO is one of main the challenges here, alongside insurers not wanting to add cost and friction into their processes.

I know you’ve got your own quote engine, but most insurers have multiple quote and claims systems, all of which are cannibalised versions of other systems. Equally, the queues for IT enhancements are ususallly Howard’s of months and often things get bumped. I can’t see this being a huge priority for the large motor insurers.
It is true in regards to GIGO.

I had to challenge my own insurer over the accuracy of a claim that should have been closed, but was still showing as open on CUE and rest of the databases that are "supposed" to help.

I think from a customer perspective it is frustrating that some of these agencies/ databases are not just more open, I mean how many have really heard of more CRA's beyond the usual suspects like Experian, Callcredit and Equifax to the less known less Hunter.

Having been into a major insurer base in Bromley (the one that split from a major bank...) it did open my eyes to the level of complexity, the level of data being pulled, collected and outputted, but as said elsewhere the issues of silos.

Which is one reason so many have started overlaying MDM and other solutions on top, but issues like senior management changes (and their relevant methods and direction) and the obligatory outsourcing always caused issues (and one of these is a major reason by the multi million and year project really never progressed as far as it could).


Having come across some data transformation teams working for major insurers I could say I would not touch Hiscox for example.


HarveyM

Original Poster:

154 posts

173 months

Monday 13th August 2018
quotequote all
davek_964 said:
First Insurance : 01344 286194. Ask for Amy Park if you get a chance.

Apparently they specialise in drivers with convictions, but you never know - maybe they can help.
Trading name of Fresh Insurance Services Group Ltd... who also trade as Auto Saint!

I’ll pass it on though, thanks. Worth a call.