Are Smart Motorways Dangerous?

Are Smart Motorways Dangerous?

Author
Discussion

djc206

12,362 posts

126 months

Sunday 26th January 2020
quotequote all
IJWS15 said:
If that. Is anything like the clips they are showing today then each of the drivers shown should be done for the current version of careless . . .
That’s probably what needs to happen but harsher. Driving in a lane with a red x above it on a smart motorway should be an instant 1 week ban. Make a big deal out of it in the news and on social media and soon enough people might start taking it seriously.

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 26th January 2020
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
Pretty damning when the Minister who gave the go ahead says he was misled.
You know ministers lie and mislead the public all the time ?

Or are you just naive ?

BertBert

19,072 posts

212 months

Sunday 26th January 2020
quotequote all
speedyguy said:
You know ministers lie and mislead the public all the time ?

Or are you just naive ?
He probably isn't overtly partisan though

pingu393

7,824 posts

206 months

Sunday 26th January 2020
quotequote all
djc206 said:
IJWS15 said:
If that. Is anything like the clips they are showing today then each of the drivers shown should be done for the current version of careless . . .
That’s probably what needs to happen but harsher. Driving in a lane with a red x above it on a smart motorway should be an instant 1 week ban. Make a big deal out of it in the news and on social media and soon enough people might start taking it seriously.
I've seen cars go through 40s above the speed limit get flashed, but red X lane users at the same gantry not flashed.

Simply policing the lane would be a start.

GTI16V

542 posts

75 months

Sunday 26th January 2020
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
news article

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51236375

On Panorama tomorrow (Monday 27 Jan)

Pretty damning when the Minister who gave the go ahead says he was misled about how they would be rolled out.
Sorry to hijack the thread, but how the actual fk is that lying, slimy Grant Shapps still a government minister for fks sake?!!!
I actually despair that he's in charge of such a critical department.curse

Peter911

484 posts

158 months

Sunday 26th January 2020
quotequote all
GTI16V said:
Sorry to hijack the thread, but how the actual fk is that lying, slimy Grant Shapps still a government minister for fks sake?!!!
I actually despair that he's in charge of such a critical department.curse
Shouldnt you be concentrating on twitter trolling to get Wrong-Daily elected?

Berry10000

119 posts

103 months

Sunday 26th January 2020
quotequote all
djc206 said:
That’s probably what needs to happen but harsher. Driving in a lane with a red x above it on a smart motorway should be an instant 1 week ban. Make a big deal out of it in the news and on social media and soon enough people might start taking it seriously.
Agree, but I think part of the problem if I read the article correctly, is that it takes on average 17 minutes before the lane is marked with the red X after someone has broken down, hence this is probably one of the danger periods.

Even with the new planned radar system, the lack of hard shoulder just makes me nervous if I ever happen to break down on a live lane.

dmsims

6,539 posts

268 months

Sunday 26th January 2020
quotequote all
I hope Highways England is prosecuted for negligence

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 26th January 2020
quotequote all
dmsims said:
I hope Highways England is prosecuted for negligence
Hear hear’ well said

eccles

13,740 posts

223 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
djc206 said:
That’s probably what needs to happen but harsher. Driving in a lane with a red x above it on a smart motorway should be an instant 1 week ban. Make a big deal out of it in the news and on social media and soon enough people might start taking it seriously.
It's a shame that the roll out of smart motorways wasn't given such a fan fare.
Many, many people only drive on motorways once a year when they go on holiday etc, they aren't used to them and such a significant change should have had a huge amount more publicity before it was rolled out.
Yes, I know the old caveat that ignorance is no excuse, but in the real world people don't keep up with development or rule changes.

frisbee

4,980 posts

111 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
news article

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51236375

On Panorama tomorrow (Monday 27 Jan)

Pretty damning when the Minister who gave the go ahead says he was misled about how they would be rolled out.
I'm pretty sure they've changed that article, when I read it yesterday it had the total distance of all motorway in the UK and total deaths, 2000 miles and 90.

Smart and total deaths/mile came out about the same, given that smart motorways will be busier the numbers didn't really support their argument.

dmsims

6,539 posts

268 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
frisbee said:
Smart and total deaths/mile came out about the same, given that smart motorways will be busier the numbers didn't really support their argument.
You have conveniently forgotten that not all "Smart" motorways are of the same design

ceesvdelst

289 posts

56 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
Why are not all Smart motorways of the same design? There are multiple jobs that pretty much presume you are driving all over the country, surely it is idiocy to presume that EVERY single driver is going to know the subtle differences.

I have been on several where the escape bays are very few and far between it there at all, and as others have said, the fact it can take 10 minutes or more for the lane lights to react is pure craziness and goes against the naming, SMART!

I do think they are a death trap and more pressure needs to be applied to either eliminate them completely or go back to using the inside lane as hard shoulder.

bolidemichael

13,901 posts

202 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
eccles said:
djc206 said:
That’s probably what needs to happen but harsher. Driving in a lane with a red x above it on a smart motorway should be an instant 1 week ban. Make a big deal out of it in the news and on social media and soon enough people might start taking it seriously.
It's a shame that the roll out of smart motorways wasn't given such a fan fare.
Many, many people only drive on motorways once a year when they go on holiday etc, they aren't used to them and such a significant change should have had a huge amount more publicity before it was rolled out.
Yes, I know the old caveat that ignorance is no excuse, but in the real world people don't keep up with development or rule changes.
I cover quite a few miles annually, though this thread has made me realise that I don't actually use the m-way network in anger for congestion heavy periods. I'm pretty unprepared for the inherent risks in Smart motorways, though I have my wits about me when I'm driving.

As posted previously, I was shocked at how crap the system was at late, clear, Sunday night in Summer. It was almost as though the operator (if human) was having a laugh with the speed limit adjustments.

The thought of no hard shoulder and no quick access to a warning triangle, has me rethinking what equipment I should have to hand, accessible from the cabin, in the event of a breakdown.

ScoobyChris

1,694 posts

203 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
Thought of this thread driving on the M4 yesterday when I noticed "emergency refuge in xxx yards" signs along the side of the smart motorway section around Bristol. I assume they're pretty new as they still had the red/orange fencing around them and I don't recall seeing them before Christmas.

Chris

Digga

40,349 posts

284 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
On the whoel, a recurrent impression from driving on the continent is it feels easier and people's lane discipline is generally better.

One obvious difference, aside from most Western European economies having invested far more in the building of new motorways generally, is the fact most only have 3 lanes.

I do not think most users are well suited, spatially, to multiple lanes, three is enough of a challenge. Often, on a four lane motorway, the outer two lanes are little different in use to a three.

Aside from at major junctions, three really is enough lanes IMHO for most people to cope with.

bolidemichael

13,901 posts

202 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
Digga said:
I do not think most users are well suited, spatially, to multiple lanes, three is enough of a challenge. Often, on a four lane motorway, the outer two lanes are little different in use to a three.
People will tend to hog the outermost lane minus one. It's a terrible cultural trait of driving standard complacency. Apols for going OT.

Digga

40,349 posts

284 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
bolidemichael said:
Digga said:
I do not think most users are well suited, spatially, to multiple lanes, three is enough of a challenge. Often, on a four lane motorway, the outer two lanes are little different in use to a three.
People will tend to hog the outermost lane minus one. It's a terrible cultural trait of driving standard complacency. Apols for going OT.
No, it is way on topic.

What 'Smart Motorways' has done, is use the sticking plaster of extra (less well utilised) lanes to the existing roads, instead of building redundancy and capacity through alternate routes, as the Germans have.

Now, when there is an accident and the whole north or southbound or whatever is shut, it's four lanes out of action. Had there been another road, even if it was only a dual carriageway, there'd still be lanes moving.

bolidemichael

13,901 posts

202 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
Digga said:
bolidemichael said:
Digga said:
I do not think most users are well suited, spatially, to multiple lanes, three is enough of a challenge. Often, on a four lane motorway, the outer two lanes are little different in use to a three.
People will tend to hog the outermost lane minus one. It's a terrible cultural trait of driving standard complacency. Apols for going OT.
No, it is way on topic.

What 'Smart Motorways' has done, is use the sticking plaster of extra (less well utilised) lanes to the existing roads, instead of building redundancy and capacity through alternate routes, as the Germans have.

Now, when there is an accident and the whole north or southbound or whatever is shut, it's four lanes out of action. Had there been another road, even if it was only a dual carriageway, there'd still be lanes moving.
France and Germany are really large countries - the UK doesn't have the real estate capacity to be creating newer and wider roads. I really advocate signs emblazoned with 'keep left unless overtaking' on every display.

Digga

40,349 posts

284 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
bolidemichael said:
Digga said:
bolidemichael said:
Digga said:
I do not think most users are well suited, spatially, to multiple lanes, three is enough of a challenge. Often, on a four lane motorway, the outer two lanes are little different in use to a three.
People will tend to hog the outermost lane minus one. It's a terrible cultural trait of driving standard complacency. Apols for going OT.
No, it is way on topic.

What 'Smart Motorways' has done, is use the sticking plaster of extra (less well utilised) lanes to the existing roads, instead of building redundancy and capacity through alternate routes, as the Germans have.

Now, when there is an accident and the whole north or southbound or whatever is shut, it's four lanes out of action. Had there been another road, even if it was only a dual carriageway, there'd still be lanes moving.
France and Germany are really large countries - the UK doesn't have the real estate capacity to be creating newer and wider roads. I really advocate signs emblazoned with 'keep left unless overtaking' on every display.
There's loads of space in the UK and we don't need anything like the overall miles of larger continental neighbours, but we do need more than we've got, because, quite simply, what worked okay in the 1970-80's is clearly not going to be fit for purpose now.