The f**kin cheek of it
Discussion
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Could it have been his airwaves handset? That is exempt! Or could you identify the specific model of Nokia
anonymous said:
[redacted]
So it was dark as well! How could you see what he was doing in the car? 'R Verses Turnbull' is the definitive guide on these sort of issues !
gone said:gone - when will you get the message? There is a rash of anecdotal evidence that many BiB believe that the motoring laws do not apply to them - Streaky
anonymous said:[redacted]Could it have been his airwaves handset? That is exempt! Or could you identify the specific model of Nokia
beano500 said:
Yes - but when it comes to mobile 'phones half the population think it's a law that doesn't apply to them!!!
And when it comes to speed 99% of the population think it doesn't apply to them. (Including me!)
Yes - Bib - should be setting an example when in uniform. No - we shouldn't go bonkers about it when they prove themselves otherwise just like the rest of us.
streaky said:
gone - when will you get the message? There is a rash of anecdotal evidence that many BiB believe that the motoring laws do not apply to them - Streaky
Streaky!
When will you get the message? There is a rash of anecdotal evidence that many MOP believe that ALL motoring laws apply to them Gone.
There is also a rash of evidence that people are willing to make opinions and judgements about what Bib do wrong on the flimsiest of evidence without hearing or finding out the full facts
>> Edited by gone on Monday 23 May 08:41
Can we please stop all this BiB bashing? It's repetitive, predictable and pretty boring. It also dissuades the resident BiBs such as Gone et al from contributing, which is a shame. Obviously there are coppers who don't practise what they preach, that's common sense, but posting ad infinitum about minor misdemeanors is just pointless.
Mad Dave said:
Can we please stop all this BiB bashing? It's repetitive, predictable and pretty boring. It also dissuades the resident BiBs such as Gone et al from contributing, which is a shame. Obviously there are coppers who don't practise what they preach, that's common sense, but posting ad infinitum about minor misdemeanors is just pointless.
Let he who never driven with a bulb blown, or ever used a mobile when they shouldn't cast the first stone
lieber gone said:
streaky said:
gone - when will you get the message? There is a rash of anecdotal evidence that many BiB believe that the motoring laws do not apply to them - Streaky
Streaky!
When will you get the message? There is a rash of anecdotal evidence that many MOP believe that ALL motoring laws apply to them Gone.
There is also a rash of evidence that people are willing to make opinions and judgements about what Bib do wrong on the flimsiest of evidence without hearing or finding out the full facts
>> Edited by gone on Monday 23 May 08:41
But Liebchen... I do not think PC Milton's testing out his ability to reach unexploded doughnuts in time was based on flimsiest evidence
Und I can tell a Handy from the thingy I see used in traffic cops...when I see one...und then there was the one I saw scoffing a doughnut whilst driving... und I can spot a cream doughnut at great distance...
Und then there was the one squeezing his zits at the traffic lights - und both hands off the wheel... he could have entertained me better by playing his air guitar - like that other bloke who was allegedly fined for it...
Und then there was the WPC who was exploring her nosey for greenest bogeys at a crossroads.... But at least she ws not holding a doughnut in her other hand at the time
But am not sure I would like to examine the evidence that closely....but when people are prosecuted over apples, playing air guitars, und over very silliest excuses... und then we see BiB showing they are human like us und doing same things und not getting nit picked on... you can understand why we tease you a little over it...
WildCat said:
But Liebchen... I do not think PC Milton's testing out his ability to reach unexploded doughnuts in time was based on flimsiest evidence
wildcat said:
Und I can tell a Handy from the thingy....
I am so very gald to hear that. Maybe thats the reason why you have managed to spit out so many kittens !
wildcat said:
......I see used in traffic cops...when I see one...und then there was the one I saw scoffing a doughnut whilst driving... und I can spot a cream doughnut at great distance...
That paragraph just confirms that you are in fact quite positively barking mad and I was right in my assessment of you !
Wildcat said:
Und then there was the one squeezing his zits at the traffic lights - und both hands off the wheel... he could have entertained me better by playing his air guitar - like that other bloke who was allegedly fined for it...
Eh?
Wildcat said:
Und then there was the WPC who was exploring her nosey for greenest bogeys at a crossroads.... But at least she ws not holding a doughnut in her other hand at the time
Otherwise she would also have had both hands off the wheel too!!
Wildcat said:
But am not sure I would like to examine the evidence that closely....but when people are prosecuted over apples, playing air guitars, und over very silliest excuses... und then we see BiB showing they are human like us und doing same things und not getting nit picked on... you can understand why we tease you a little over it...
I understand more than you think Mrs Cat !
Did you see her bogeys in the dark?
>> Edited by gone on Monday 23 May 19:34
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff