I want his badge....

[jakesmith]

Red 4 said:

No jakesmith, you're wrong.

Breach of the piece (amongst others) is a cracker though.

I know the Queen's rules.
Sady you've not even got enough respect for me to use a capital letter for my name. Shocking.

[PorkInsider]

jakesmith said:

Red 4 said:

No jakesmith, you're wrong.

Breach of the piece (amongst others) is a cracker though.

I know the Queen's rules.
Sady you've not even got enough respect for me to use a capital letter for my name. Shocking.

Well to be fair, you haven't had enough respect for yourself to give yourself a username with capitals. Red4 has used your name exactly as it appears.

To pick just one of your interesting list, how do you think someone carrying (only carrying) a sledgehammer would be looking at an affray charge?

[jakesmith]

PorkInsider said:

jakesmith said:

Red 4 said:

No jakesmith, you're wrong.

Breach of the piece (amongst others) is a cracker though.

I know the Queen's rules.
Sady you've not even got enough respect for me to use a capital letter for my name. Shocking.

Well to be fair, you haven't had enough respect for yourself to give yourself a username with capitals. Red4 has used your name exactly as it appears.

To pick just one of your interesting list, how do you think someone carrying (only carrying) a sledgehammer would be looking at an affray charge?

Very clever.
You won't be asking how it's affray if he clonks you with his sledgehammer though.

[Red 4]

jakesmith said:

Red 4 said:

No jakesmith, you're wrong.

Breach of the piece (amongst others) is a cracker though.

I know the Queen's rules.
Sady you've not even got enough respect for me to use a capital letter for my name. Shocking.

The Queen's rules ? Like keeping ravens at The Tower of London, that kind of stuff ?

I bet that comes in handy jakeyboy.

[jakesmith]

Red 4 said:

jakesmith said:

Red 4 said:

No jakesmith, you're wrong.

Breach of the piece (amongst others) is a cracker though.

I know the Queen's rules.
Sady you've not even got enough respect for me to use a capital letter for my name. Shocking.

The Queen's rules ? Like keeping ravens at The Tower of London, that kind of stuff ?

I bet that comes in handy jakeyboy.

You know perfectly well what I mean - what they do at the The Old Baileys - The Queen's English

[MSR12c]

jakesmith said:

WRONG

If there were any plod or even a QC on here they can tell you you'd be looking@ quite a rap sheet

- Offensive weapon
- Going equipped
- Section 5 Public Order (causing alarm and distress)
- Breach of Piece
- Affray
- Causing a hullabaloo
- Reckless Endangerment (misdemeanor)

You'd be looking at some time in the big house IMO

I work in the legal profession but am not a criminal lawyer. Nonetheless, from my vague knowledge of that area of the law, I have reservations that your post is correct. Most certainly, your suggested outcome is far from accurate. In any event, I do not propose to investigate what was nothing more than a reasonable hypothesis on wasting our constabulary’s valuable time.

[jakesmith]

MSR12c said:

I work in the legal profession but am not a criminal lawyer. Nonetheless, from my vague knowledge of that area of the law, I have reservations that your post is correct. Most certainly, your suggested outcome is far from accurate. In any event, I do not propose to investigate what was nothing more than a reasonable hypothesis on wasting our constabulary’s valuable time.

Sounds like you might be a paratrooper legal passing yourself of as one who’s actually sat The Knowledge

[Greendubber]

jakesmith said:

WRONG

If there were any plod or even a QC on here they can tell you you'd be looking@ quite a rap sheet

- Offensive weapon
- Going equipped
- Section 5 Public Order (causing alarm and distress)
- Breach of Piece
- Affray
- Causing a hullabaloo
- Reckless Endangerment (misdemeanor)

You'd be looking at some time in the big house IMO

- Offensive weapon - nope

- Going equipped - nope

- Section 5 Public Order (causing alarm and distress) - nope

- Breach of Piece - piece of what?

- Affray - nope, look at the definition of affray, you cant commit one on your own.

- Causing a hullabaloo - ah yes, serious jail time.

- Reckless Endangerment (misdemeanor) - big stretch for that I'm sure. At least 15 years, possibly the chair.

[jakesmith]

Greendubber said:

jakesmith said:

WRONG

If there were any plod or even a QC on here they can tell you you'd be looking@ quite a rap sheet

- Offensive weapon
- Going equipped
- Section 5 Public Order (causing alarm and distress)
- Breach of Piece
- Affray
- Causing a hullabaloo
- Reckless Endangerment (misdemeanor)

You'd be looking at some time in the big house IMO

- Offensive weapon - nope

- Going equipped - nope

- Section 5 Public Order (causing alarm and distress) - nope

- Breach of Piece - piece of what?

- Affray - nope, look at the definition of affray, you cant commit one on your own.

- Causing a hullabaloo - ah yes, serious jail time.

- Reckless Endangerment (misdemeanor) - big stretch for that I'm sure. At least 15 years, possibly the chair.

Don’t talk to me about inputs, talk to me about outputs. If he’s looking at serious time in state, federal or even supermax for Hullabaloo then that’s good enough for me and the other posters on here. The main thing is he’s locked up.

[Greendubber]

jakesmith said:

Greendubber said:

jakesmith said:

WRONG

If there were any plod or even a QC on here they can tell you you'd be looking@ quite a rap sheet

- Offensive weapon
- Going equipped
- Section 5 Public Order (causing alarm and distress)
- Breach of Piece
- Affray
- Causing a hullabaloo
- Reckless Endangerment (misdemeanor)

You'd be looking at some time in the big house IMO

- Offensive weapon - nope

- Going equipped - nope

- Section 5 Public Order (causing alarm and distress) - nope

- Breach of Piece - piece of what?

- Affray - nope, look at the definition of affray, you cant commit one on your own.

- Causing a hullabaloo - ah yes, serious jail time.

- Reckless Endangerment (misdemeanor) - big stretch for that I'm sure. At least 15 years, possibly the chair.

Don’t talk to me about inputs, talk to me about outputs. If he’s looking at serious time in state, federal or even supermax for Hullabaloo then that’s good enough for me and the other posters on here. The main thing is he’s locked up.

I'm sure the last bloke I arrested for Hullabaloo ended up being sent to Monster Island by a District Judge he upset.

[jakesmith]

Greendubber said:

jakesmith said:

Greendubber said:

jakesmith said:

WRONG

If there were any plod or even a QC on here they can tell you you'd be looking@ quite a rap sheet

- Offensive weapon
- Going equipped
- Section 5 Public Order (causing alarm and distress)
- Breach of Piece
- Affray
- Causing a hullabaloo
- Reckless Endangerment (misdemeanor)

You'd be looking at some time in the big house IMO

- Offensive weapon - nope

- Going equipped - nope

- Section 5 Public Order (causing alarm and distress) - nope

- Breach of Piece - piece of what?

- Affray - nope, look at the definition of affray, you cant commit one on your own.

- Causing a hullabaloo - ah yes, serious jail time.

- Reckless Endangerment (misdemeanor) - big stretch for that I'm sure. At least 15 years, possibly the chair.

Don’t talk to me about inputs, talk to me about outputs. If he’s looking at serious time in state, federal or even supermax for Hullabaloo then that’s good enough for me and the other posters on here. The main thing is he’s locked up.

I'm sure the last bloke I arrested for Hullabaloo ended up being sent to Monster Island by a District Judge he upset.

Did the felon continue to cause a hullabaloo down at the precinct, did you have to bomp him with your nightstick?

[surveyor_101]

jakesmith said:

WRONG

If there were any plod or even a QC on here they can tell you you'd be looking@ quite a rap sheet

- Offensive weapon
- Going equipped
- Section 5 Public Order (causing alarm and distress)
- Breach of Piece
- Affray
- Causing a hullabaloo
- Reckless Endangerment (misdemeanor)

You'd be looking at some time in the big house IMO

Bit of mix of english and us law there> what sort of piece or peace do you mean?

[jakesmith]

surveyor_101 said:

Bit of mix of english and us law there> what sort of piece or peace do you mean?

Not sure based on your above ‘effort’ that you’re quite up to critiquing me on technicalities just yet pal!

But in answer, the DA would likely have his ass on the reckless endangerment misdemeanour, or maybe plea bargain for County on a S5 breach IMO.

[Rushjob]

jakesmith said:

Not sure based on your above ‘effort’ that you’re quite up to critiquing me on technicalities just yet pal!

But in answer, the DA would likely have his ass on the reckless endangerment misdemeanour, or maybe plea bargain for County on a S5 breach IMO.

What on earth are you on about?

[jakesmith]

Rushjob said:

jakesmith said:

Not sure based on your above ‘effort’ that you’re quite up to critiquing me on technicalities just yet pal!

But in answer, the DA would likely have his ass on the reckless endangerment misdemeanour, or maybe plea bargain for County on a S5 breach IMO.

What on earth are you on about?

The guy is running around Asda with a sledgehammer that’s what

[Rushjob]

jakesmith said:

The guy is running around Asda with a sledgehammer that’s what

But it was actually Tesco referred to so well done on that.... Tesco being a company in the UK, not the USA......

So bearing this in mind, why are you on about the DA and reckless endangerment and misdemeanours??

Where do any of those factor in?

I think you spent too much time as a kid watching reruns of crappy US cop shows.

Edited by Rushjob on Monday 26th October 17:39

[surveyor_101]

jakesmith said:

The guy is running around Asda with a sledgehammer that’s what

Made up a situation and mixed US laws with UK, seems a bit odd

[eps]

jakesmith said:

MSR12c said:

Just for clarity, truly I have no intention of wandering around Tesco with a sledgehammer. However, if I chose to do so, it wouldn’t be illegal, just stupid and inconsiderate

WRONG

If there were any plod or even a QC on here they can tell you you'd be looking@ quite a rap sheet

- Offensive weapon
- Going equipped
- Section 5 Public Order (causing alarm and distress)
- Breach of Piece
- Affray
- Causing a hullabaloo
- Reckless Endangerment (misdemeanor)

You'd be looking at some time in the big house IMO

But he'd just been to Aldi where it was one of the weekly specials!

[jakesmith]

eps said:

jakesmith said:

MSR12c said:

Just for clarity, truly I have no intention of wandering around Tesco with a sledgehammer. However, if I chose to do so, it wouldn’t be illegal, just stupid and inconsiderate

WRONG

If there were any plod or even a QC on here they can tell you you'd be looking@ quite a rap sheet

- Offensive weapon
- Going equipped
- Section 5 Public Order (causing alarm and distress)
- Breach of Piece
- Affray
- Causing a hullabaloo
- Reckless Endangerment (misdemeanor)

You'd be looking at some time in the big house IMO

But he'd just been to Aldi where it was one of the weekly specials!

No read the thread, he was causing a hullabaloo with it

[ShampooEfficient]

eps said:

But he'd just been to Aldi where it was one of the weekly specials!