Vehicle Registration Offences (Penalty Points) Bill

Vehicle Registration Offences (Penalty Points) Bill

Author
Discussion

PorkInsider

Original Poster:

5,892 posts

142 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
A new bill was presented to the HoC a few minutes ago.

The Bill (a Ten Minute Rule Bill) aims to amend the punishments for keeping or driving a vehicle with an illegal number plate, or without a number plate. It seeks to add three penalty points to an offender’s licence in addition to the usual £100 (rising to £1,000) fine.

No one spoke in opposition and it has a second hearing now planned for next month.

It was presented from the angle of tackling bikers with missing/small rear plates but will be interesting to see what impact it has on the number of vehicles not displaying front plates as that seems to be becoming more common, unless I'm just noticing it more?

Alucidnation

16,810 posts

171 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Good.

The_Nugget

650 posts

58 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Good.

They of course could already fine people £100. They should just set up a check point in every major city and wave people in with illegal number plates and fine them.
Then use the money to do something else. The amount I see, they’d be coining it in.

eldar

21,806 posts

197 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Bad. We already have laws which cover this, why duplicate?

ApexCult

4,917 posts

154 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Lots of special/classic cars that look much better without the front plate will sadly be scooped up in this.

Good for all the Barry illegal plates out there to be slowly eradicated!

normalbloke

7,463 posts

220 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
This is mostly driven by more reliance on ANPR for various reasons, inc law enforcement,LEZ and congestion charging etc etc.

Ardennes92

611 posts

81 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Should also be three strikes and off to the crusher as far as I am concerned

davek_964

8,836 posts

176 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
PorkInsider said:
A new bill was presented to the HoC a few minutes ago.

The Bill (a Ten Minute Rule Bill) aims to amend the punishments for keeping or driving a vehicle with an illegal number plate, or without a number plate. It seeks to add three penalty points to an offender’s licence in addition to the usual £100 (rising to £1,000) fine.

No one spoke in opposition and it has a second hearing now planned for next month.

It was presented from the angle of tackling bikers with missing/small rear plates but will be interesting to see what impact it has on the number of vehicles not displaying front plates as that seems to be becoming more common, unless I'm just noticing it more?
Think you're just noticing it more. Large sports bikes very often have smaller plates - I'd say much more than cars without front plates.

Jimmy Recard

17,540 posts

180 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Let's hope it gets through!

Psycho Warren

3,087 posts

114 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
I think 3 points on the licence for something that has no relation to vehicle safety or driver standards/ safety is a bit harsh.

Fine them to death though and use the money for something useful.

Jarcy

1,559 posts

276 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Bad.

It is not a road safety issue.
There is not a problem with lack of detection or avoidance of ANPR.
This is not in the public interest.

Those who say "good" do so purely on a matter of taste.
We have enough legislation, penalties and taxing of the motorist. Our freedoms are already restricted far too much.
We on PH should be voicing every opportunity to oppose this, whether you think silly plates are tasteful or not.

Durzel

12,283 posts

169 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Not having a plate or having an illegible one could make it harder to identify a vehicle involved in some sort of criminal activity, or simply a crash.

Could you not make a similar argument about "not about road safety" about points for no insurance?

Jarcy

1,559 posts

276 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Durzel said:
Not having a plate or having an illegible one could make it harder to identify a vehicle involved in some sort of criminal activity, or simply a crash.
How would 3 points rectify that situation?

Durzel

12,283 posts

169 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Jarcy said:
Durzel said:
Not having a plate or having an illegible one could make it harder to identify a vehicle involved in some sort of criminal activity, or simply a crash.
How would 3 points rectify that situation?
It would make the driver of the car with illegal/missing plates less likely to do it in future? The same with points for everything else?

Plymo

1,152 posts

90 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
It's bad...
3 points for driving with say a number plate cracked that day by some twerp reversing into it?
Remember you now can't get them (in theory) without providing ID and Logbook or equivalent documents

Points should be reserved for offences that have some sort of safety effect.
Even not having a seatbelt doesn't carry points!

As always it will be the (mostly) law abiding majority that get caught for this stuff, the scrotes will run rings around the police as usual, and will be left alone as it's "too difficult"


vonhosen

40,249 posts

218 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Jarcy said:
Bad.

It is not a road safety issue.
There is not a problem with lack of detection or avoidance of ANPR.
This is not in the public interest.

Those who say "good" do so purely on a matter of taste.
We have enough legislation, penalties and taxing of the motorist. Our freedoms are already restricted far too much.
We on PH should be voicing every opportunity to oppose this, whether you think silly plates are tasteful or not.
You don't have the freedom to not use an illegal, or have no, plate now.
It isn't new law, it's a change in available sentencing presumably because they believe that the current penalties are insufficient to persuade a large enough number who won't bother complying with the current sentencing.
The proposed measures are presumably in order to change that balance.


Jarcy

1,559 posts

276 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Plymo said:
It's bad...

As always it will be the (mostly) law abiding majority that get caught for this stuff, the scrotes will run rings around the police as usual, and will be left alone as it's "too difficult"
No, Durzel has pointed out that the scrotes will nonetheless now run legal plates for fear of licence endorsement, despite their illegal activities or their desire to flee the scene of a crash.

55palfers

5,915 posts

165 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Don't recall that in the Manifesto.

Presented to an empty HoC too I presume?

Wonderman

2,271 posts

196 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
Jarcy said:
No, Durzel has pointed out that the scrotes will nonetheless now run legal plates for fear of licence endorsement, despite their illegal activities or their desire to flee the scene of a crash.
They will definitely be sweating that it will add to the ban they are already under, and the fact that they have no insurance, and it's not their car (better fine the original owner too to ensure the message hits home), and that they've run someone over...twice and resisted arrest...

PorkInsider

Original Poster:

5,892 posts

142 months

Wednesday 21st October 2020
quotequote all
55palfers said:
Don't recall that in the Manifesto.

Presented to an empty HoC too I presume?
There were a few on the benches but not exactly packed out.