No Mask, No Entry, No Exceptions

[anonymous-user]

sevensfun said:

Same goes for the muzzle lovers.

'Muzzle'.



Grow the fk up

[PorkInsider]

Where have these new accounts come from?

New cretins who seem to be just repeating the same stuff that was posted months ago.

And "muzzles", "face nappies"??

Grow the fk up.

[Griffith4ever]

dave_s13 said:

I've got 3 under 13 you pillock. I'm biased but they are generally very polite, well behaved and gebrally a joy to spend time with.

You are wasting your breath here - the anger and lack of reasoning is astonishing. Lots of "wan..r" and "grow the f up". You are not talking to people who are listening. They are going full on "delete / shout down mode".

Oh! Edit... Now a second "grow the f up" has appeared above as I made this post!. See what I mean :-) save your breath ;-)

Edited by Griffith4ever on Monday 28th June 23:26

[bad company]

PorkInsider said:

Where have these new accounts come from?

New cretins who seem to be just repeating the same stuff that was posted months ago.

And "muzzles", "face nappies"??

Grow the fk up.

Muzzle is a very fair and apt description.

[WonkeyDonkey]

bad company said:

Muzzle is a very fair and apt description.

The infantile trolling wasn't funny 25 pages back and still isn't.

[Gareth1974]

Iminquarantine said:

Countdown said:

You've clearly never had children. It's rare that they're willing to do something they don't want to do and the badly brought-up ones will thcweam and thcweam and thcweam until they get their way - exactly the type of behaviour being displayed by the anti-maskers.

If you're happy with being labelled an ahole then that's absolutely fine, you've got nothing to worry about as that's probably what most people will be assuming when they see you without a mask.

Yeah, pretty much. Asshole, anti vaxxer, general fruitcake. There are some people who genuinely cannot wear masks, but almost always, it’s just a sign of being a wker. wker in many ways, the lack of a mask just makes it more obvious.

This perception of people who aren't wearing masks sums up why I largely avoid going out, and chose to suffer panic attacks during my weekly trip to the supermarket rather than legitimately going maskless.

[sevensfun]

WonkeyDonkey said:

The infantile trolling wasn't funny 25 pages back and still isn't.

Ah so it’s trolling when it doesn’t suit your view

Typical muzzle sheep

[V8covin]

You're not going to like this but if you get a panic attack from wearing a small piece of cloth over your nose and mouth shouldn't you be seeking therapy ?

[sevensfun]

V8covin said:

You're not going to like this but if you get a panic attack from wearing a small piece of cloth over your nose and mouth shouldn't you be seeking therapy ?

Ah so that’s the solution to anxiety is it?

[Gareth1974]

V8covin said:

You're not going to like this but if you get a panic attack from wearing a small piece of cloth over your nose and mouth shouldn't you be seeking therapy ?

In my case, I was already having therapy at the point that the pandemic began. And with help I've been able to go from a position that I had an problem within seconds of putting a mask on, to being able to sometimes do an entire food shop without one (a panic attack). Although this isn't always the case.

It's not mask wearing as such that causes an issue - I've never been able to wear a scarf around my face for instance.

[anonymous-user]

sevensfun said:

Roman Rhodes said:

Is this the 5 minute argument or the full half hour? You don't wear a mask. Clever little you - have a virtual pat on the head. You appear to be the only one getting upset (if you wear a mask). They don't bother me and pointing out that you sound like a petulant child isn't being upset, in fact you're amusing in a 'some mothers do 'ave 'em' kind of way.

Nah, I don't know if i'll be upset as I have never worn one but don't like the idea of it.

And yet.

sevensfun said:

I find them severely distressing (totally honest)

How’s that for you?

So you are the one pretending to have a disability and lying to the checkout girl at Asda. Big man.

[Alucidnation]

sevensfun said:

WonkeyDonkey said:

The infantile trolling wasn't funny 25 pages back and still isn't.

Ah so it’s trolling when it doesn’t suit your view

Typical muzzle sheep

I think I have just sussed out who you are/were.

[anonymous-user]

It’s very early for the tag team/multi logins to be out and about.

Must be getting worried as we approach lockdown ending.

[sevensfun]

Roman Rhodes said:

So you are the one pretending to have a disability and lying to the checkout girl at Asda. Big man.

Nice poke at my weight there. Classy.

[citizensm1th]

sevensfun said:

Roman Rhodes said:

So you are the one pretending to have a disability and lying to the checkout girl at Asda. Big man.

Nice poke at my weight there. Classy.

Just how was rr supposedly to know you are a rotund chap before this post of yours telling him so?

[anonymous-user]

[redacted]

[bad company]

WonkeyDonkey said:

The infantile trolling wasn't funny 25 pages back and still isn't.

So stop doing it.

[InitialDave]

Roman Rhodes said:

I think it’s more a position of being anti “massive ahole”, a position with which I agree. Fortunately the “massive aholes” are very much in the minority so life goes on with a bit of minor inconvenience for the majority and the stampy feet types impress each other with their ineffectual gestures.

Sounds about right, yep.

[Griffith4ever]

Well well well, here it is , the masks almost everyone are wearing, surgical , or fabric, are fairly useless at stopping covid.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-57636360

NHS Foundation trust in Cambridge

"For most of last year, the hospital followed national guidance which specifies that healthcare workers should wear surgical masks, except in a few limited situations.

Though fluid resistant, these masks are relatively flimsy and loose-fitting and are not meant to screen out infectious aerosols - tiny virus particles that can linger in the air and are now widely accepted as a source of coronavirus infection."

Goes on to show in a graphic that surgical masks "do not protect against smaller airborne particles"

And, on fabric masks "does not protect you but MAY protect others" - note the very, very flimsy "may"

And all the while anyone who's dared challenge the effectiveness of surgical masks has be beaten down with "it's just obvious, wear one!"

[sevensfun]

Griffith4ever said:

Well well well, here it is , the masks almost everyone are wearing, surgical , or fabric, are fairly useless at stopping covid.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-57636360

NHS Foundation trust in Cambridge

"For most of last year, the hospital followed national guidance which specifies that healthcare workers should wear surgical masks, except in a few limited situations.

Though fluid resistant, these masks are relatively flimsy and loose-fitting and are not meant to screen out infectious aerosols - tiny virus particles that can linger in the air and are now widely accepted as a source of coronavirus infection."

Goes on to show in a graphic that surgical masks "do not protect against smaller airborne particles"

And, on fabric masks "does not protect you but MAY protect others" - note the very, very flimsy "may"

And all the while anyone who's dared challenge the effectiveness of surgical masks has be beaten down with "it's just obvious, wear one!"

Who would have thought it? I would actually have no issue with a proper fking mask if everyone had them, I can see how that would help. Snoods, flimsy things below the nose, etc - seems to have done close to nothing. Waste of time. The NHS is not overwhelmed.