Another sold a car, buyer wants money thread

Another sold a car, buyer wants money thread

Author
Discussion

Cozmosmallpiece

1 posts

36 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
The following is taken from the AA website:-

The only legal terms that cover a private sale contract are:

1. The seller must have the right to sell the car.
2.The vehicle should match the description given by the seller.
3. The car must be roadworthy – it is a criminal offence to sell an unroadworthy car and an MOT certificate from a test several months ago is no guarantee that the car is roadworthy today.

So assuming 1 & 2 have been complied with, and a very recent MOT then 3 is covered.

With regard to going to a Tribunal, this is nonsence. The gov.uk website refers to Employment, Mental Health, Tax Land registration Tribunals.

I think they are trying to extort money from you.

CheesecakeRunner

3,875 posts

92 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
Fully agree with all the “block and move on” comments. But you say it was sold via an eBay auction, so eBay is a wildcard here. Did you do everything by the book in the eBay sale? Was your ad accurate and didn’t promise anything about condition that wasn’t accurate? Was payment made through eBay, messages through eBay etc? Just in case eBay decide they’re going to refund her as they sometimes have form for doing.

Tankrizzo

7,298 posts

194 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
I have an acquaintance - friend of a friend - who is a "driveway trader" and says this is more common than you think amongst the more scummy end of the sellers. Buy up cars for cheap, make up stories about them going wrong, if even 5% of people give you money back then they're winning for the price of writing a few text messages.

poo at Paul's

14,177 posts

176 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
Was this a Polo?

sortedcossie

564 posts

129 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
Had the same thing a few years ago, sold a sub £3,000 car on Ebay classified advert. 4 weeks later started to get text messages about loads of things failing on it. He reckoned some of them failed the day after buying it, so why wait a month to tell us.

Big giveaway for me was he wouldn't answer the phone, but would reply back to a text straight away. 100% scammer.


dingg

4,004 posts

220 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
poo at Paul's said:
Was this a Polo?
Do you mean that it was described 'mint condition'

getmecoat



PurpleTurtle

7,053 posts

145 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
Sounds like a total scammer, block and move on.

In the highly unlikely event that she goes legal, ask her lawyer if they covered caveat emptor on their first or second day at law school.

This is why I'm happy that I've kept my car for 18yrs and not had to deal with mouth breathers like this.

jamesson

3,007 posts

222 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
I don't know why you're even asking this question. You knew what the correct response was before you started this thread.

She doesn't have a leg to stand on. You know it, she knows it.

JackJarvis

2,276 posts

135 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
Really depressing how common this has become and I'll bet it works regularly.

Prizam

Original Poster:

2,347 posts

142 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
poo at Paul's said:
Was this a Polo?
Nope

GasEngineer

970 posts

63 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
sortedcossie said:
Had the same thing a few years ago, sold a sub £3,000 car on Ebay classified advert. 4 weeks later started to get text messages about loads of things failing on it. He reckoned some of them failed the day after buying it, so why wait a month to tell us.

Big giveaway for me was he wouldn't answer the phone, but would reply back to a text straight away. 100% scammer.
Not 100% scammer. Advice on this forum is to conduct such contact by emails or messages rather than phone calls. He may have thought you were the scammer by trying to catch him out with a phone call that couldn't be referred to later.

Harry Rule

183 posts

42 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
In the past I used to always sell my cars privately, I wouldn't contemplate it now and scams like this and having to deal with timewasting tts are the reason why.

So much less hassle and risk to just part exchange them or sell via one of the car buying outfits.

bad company

18,718 posts

267 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
Prizam said:
poo at Paul's said:
Was this a Polo?
Nope
So it didn’t have a hole?

petrolbloke

504 posts

158 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
Cozmosmallpiece said:
The following is taken from the AA website:-

The only legal terms that cover a private sale contract are:

1. The seller must have the right to sell the car.
2.The vehicle should match the description given by the seller.
3. The car must be roadworthy – it is a criminal offence to sell an unroadworthy car and an MOT certificate from a test several months ago is no guarantee that the car is roadworthy today.

So assuming 1 & 2 have been complied with, and a very recent MOT then 3 is covered.

With regard to going to a Tribunal, this is nonsence. The gov.uk website refers to Employment, Mental Health, Tax Land registration Tribunals.

I think they are trying to extort money from you.
IANAL but I find #3 hard to believe, even if it is written on the AA website.

Loads of people sell their potentially unroadworthy cars - MOT failures, unfinished projects, race cars etc.

Even a recent MOT doesn't guarantee a car is roadworthy.

Oceanrower

924 posts

113 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
petrolbloke said:
IANAL but I find #3 hard to believe, even if it is written on the AA website.

Loads of people sell their potentially unroadworthy cars - MOT failures, unfinished projects, race cars etc.

Even a recent MOT doesn't guarantee a car is roadworthy.
I find #3 hard to believe because it’s on the AA website.

Have you seen some of the made up stuff on there!

Edited by Oceanrower on Tuesday 23 January 20:31


Edited by Oceanrower on Tuesday 23 January 20:32


Edited by Oceanrower on Tuesday 23 January 20:33

petrolbloke

504 posts

158 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
Oceanrower said:
I find #3 hard to believe [i]because[/] it’s on the AA website.

Jane you seen some of the made up stuff on there!
laugh can't say I'm a frequent visitor!

Jordie Barretts sock

4,457 posts

20 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
I think that you must describe it as not roadworthy if you know it isn't.

Otherwise some idiot will turn up to buy your rusty wreck of a barn find and try and drive it away.

martinbiz

3,143 posts

146 months

Tuesday 23rd January
quotequote all
Jordie Barretts sock said:
I think that you must describe it as not roadworthy if you know it isn't.

Otherwise some idiot will turn up to buy your rusty wreck of a barn find and try and drive it away.
Yes, I believe “for parts or repair” is the terminology

Bright Halo

2,999 posts

236 months

Wednesday 24th January
quotequote all
This is why We Buy Any Car and the likes are so popular.
No hassle no comebacks

mikeiow

5,405 posts

131 months

Wednesday 24th January
quotequote all
Prizam said:
ok, I'm going to block and ignore.

Let's say she is genuine and goes legal. Does she have a timeframe to do this within?
It simply will not happen.
Well done: now relax & move on with your life.