Cyclist who reported Range Rover driver for using his mobile

Cyclist who reported Range Rover driver for using his mobile

Author
Discussion

Super Sonic

4,904 posts

55 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
If the phone was on his thigh then what’s the issue?
You think it's ok to use a mobile phone while in charge of a motor vehicle if it's on your thigh?

agtlaw

6,712 posts

207 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
Super Sonic said:
You think it's ok to use a mobile phone while in charge of a motor vehicle if it's on your thigh?
The law says the offence is made out when the device is hand-held. Rather than simply resting on your thigh.

I'm guessing cyclist.


Super Sonic

4,904 posts

55 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
The law says the offence is made out when the device is hand-held. Rather than simply resting on your thigh.

I'm guessing cyclist.
So it's ok to eg text while driving, as long as the phone is on your thigh? And if you cause a collision, and the police check your phone and find out you were texting at the time and charge accordingly, you think 'the phone was on my thigh' is a defence? I doubt it.

SeekerOfTruthAndPies

266 posts

38 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
I find both parties involved equally annoying. Don't use your phone, but don't be a 'wannabe' either. If it bothers you that much, volunteer to be a Special.

Seasonal Hero

7,954 posts

53 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
If the phone was on his thigh then what’s the issue?
How did it get to his thigh? Did it levitate down there? Is the phone driving itself?

agtlaw

6,712 posts

207 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
Super Sonic said:
So it's ok to eg text while driving, as long as the phone is on your thigh? And if you cause a collision, and the police check your phone and find out you were texting at the time and charge accordingly, you think 'the phone was on my thigh' is a defence? I doubt it.
It's a defence to the mobile phone offence - which, at the risk of repetition, requires the phone to be hand-held. Not a defence to other offences. E.g. not in proper control, careless driving, dangerous driving, etc. I've said this numerous times on this forum. Do a search?



ConnectionError

1,786 posts

70 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
Seasonal Hero said:
Billy_Rosewood said:
Agressive cycling is just as much a nuisance (for other cyclists as well) as st driving.
Is it though?
Absolutely

agtlaw

6,712 posts

207 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
Seasonal Hero said:
How did it get to his thigh? Did it levitate down there? Is the phone driving itself?
An example for the hard of thinking. Man is on a call. He gets into his car, places the phone on his thigh. Ignition on and drives away without touching the phone. What criminal offence do you think he's committed in that situation?

monthou

4,584 posts

51 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
ConnectionError said:
Seasonal Hero said:
Billy_Rosewood said:
Agressive cycling is just as much a nuisance (for other cyclists as well) as st driving.
Is it though?
Absolutely
If by 'nuisance' you mean cause of injuries and deaths I'd love to see your figures.

KAgantua

3,884 posts

132 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
“It is ludicrous. I don’t know if it is malicious or incompetence,”

Er... it's neither of those things, its the law.

Pity it wasnt Cycling Mikey biggrin

Seasonal Hero

7,954 posts

53 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
An example for the hard of thinking. Man is on a call. He gets into his car, places the phone on his thigh. Ignition on and drives away without touching the phone. What criminal offence do you think he's committed in that situation?
Is that what happened here?

agtlaw

6,712 posts

207 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
Seasonal Hero said:
Is that what happened here?
Prove that it didn't.

jasonrobertson86

527 posts

5 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
LivLL said:
That's not the Range Rover in this thread, it's some sort of Audi.
That's correct. That is another video where an RS6 driver gets very angry about using his phone when driving. hehe

Hugo Stiglitz

37,166 posts

212 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
Geffg said:
I’m glad he’s getting done.
All these cyclists thinking they’re the police and grassing up motorists for anything they do wrong.
I suppose it’s because all cyclists never break any motoring laws do they! None ever go through red lights, undertake, etc etc.
I don’t think there’s many motorists who never break a law whilst driving and we have enough cameras etc watching what we do never mind having dic#k head cyclists thinking they are so high and mighty and taking videos of motorists.
Obviously not all cyclists are d heads but some are. Need to mind their own business unless it directly concerns them. In reality yes driving whilst using a phone may distract and be dangerous sometimes, but sitting at lights may be annoying if you don’t move when you should but it’s certainly not dangerous.
I see many cars driving through red lights. Far more than cyclists.

I'll happily 'grass up' a driver too.

Plus people who look at their phones at lights. If they see something they need to respond to but the lights change do they put their phone down or scroll further to read the entire message and/or type?

As a motorbiker I've slapped or rapped on people's windows before when I've seen this.

JQ

5,753 posts

180 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
ConnectionError said:
Seasonal Hero said:
Billy_Rosewood said:
Agressive cycling is just as much a nuisance (for other cyclists as well) as st driving.
Is it though?
Absolutely
Really? Motor vehicles cause £12,000,000,000 of damage and kill 1,700 people per year, what are the stats for cyclists?

Gin and Ultrasonic

179 posts

40 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
Seasonal Hero said:
How did it get to his thigh? Did it levitate down there? Is the phone driving itself?
An example for the hard of thinking. Man is on a call. He gets into his car, places the phone on his thigh. Ignition on and drives away without touching the phone. What criminal offence do you think he's committed in that situation?
Yip, normal procedure for most people. Get into car, adjust mirrors, put on seatbelt, balance phone on thigh (which is absolutely the best place to put something I shouldn't be using while driving rather than putting into my pocket, putting it on the passenger seat, in the centre console, in a phone holder, or in the drivers side door pocket), drive away......

LivLL

10,878 posts

198 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
jasonrobertson86 said:
LivLL said:
That's not the Range Rover in this thread, it's some sort of Audi.
That's correct. That is another video where an RS6 driver gets very angry about using his phone when driving. hehe
Ah, ok thanks I was confused as I said it’s hard to tell without seeing a video of the OPs incident and someone posted up a completely different video rofl

My local area is infested with MAMILs at the weekend due to being close to the Olympic cycle route but it’s hardly an issue as a tickle of the throttle has me safely past.

Don’t seem many knobbers with cameras going all vigilante though, that must be a London thing.

jasonrobertson86

527 posts

5 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
LivLL said:
Ah, ok thanks I was confused as I said it’s hard to tell without seeing a video of the OPs incident and someone posted up a completely different video rofl

rofl

eldar

21,798 posts

197 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
JQ said:
Really? Motor vehicles cause £12,000,000,000 of damage and kill 1,700 people per year, what are the stats for cyclists?
Cyclists kill 2138 car drivers by means of apoplectic empurplement. Every DAY.

poo at Paul's

14,153 posts

176 months

Monday 26th February
quotequote all
Hoisted by his own retard! wink