DR10 40 years ago - impact on Daughter's Police Application?

DR10 40 years ago - impact on Daughter's Police Application?

Author
Discussion

AHarrison

Original Poster:

58 posts

10 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Hopefully one of our serving officers can advise:

I've discovered that my daughter has applied to join the Police (as a PC), but she's unaware of my DR10 conviction from 40 years agofrown Not so much as a parking ticket since then (or even before, come to that!).

Is this something which is likely to scupper her plans?

nordboy

1,471 posts

51 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Nope, should be fine.

I'd be more worried about her actually wanting to be a police officer these days (and I have over 23 yrs in!!)

seabod91

605 posts

63 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
I can’t see it. My dad got caught growing cannabis many years ago, (personal use), and it didn’t stop my sisters boyfriend from joining.

She will be fine.

I am not a police officer. So I could be totally wrong if things have changed.

JulianHJ

8,745 posts

263 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
It'll have no bearing at all. Vetting concentrates on the applicant's background, financial status and current associations, assessing the risks they present. Even if you were to get a DR10 now it would be highly unlikely to reflect on your daughter.

Derek Smith

45,687 posts

249 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Best of luck with your daughter's application. I can see no problem with her application. If she prepares a reply to a question on it at the interview, it could make her feel more confident/not worry about it, but I doubt they will ask.



SpidersWeb

3,656 posts

174 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
If she prepares a reply to a question on it at the interview, it could make her feel more confident/not worry about it, but I doubt they will ask.
Could they ask a question on it?

Asking a specific question would involve revealing someone else's criminal history and unless that individual has consented then surely that would be illegal (and even asking a question that was posed as a theoretical 'what if' question, but which had actually been based on reality would be asking for trouble).

agtlaw

6,712 posts

207 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
SpidersWeb said:
Could they ask a question on it?

Asking a specific question would involve revealing someone else's criminal history and unless that individual has consented then surely that would be illegal (and even asking a question that was posed as a theoretical 'what if' question, but which had actually been based on reality would be asking for trouble).
Criminal conviction = public record.

SpidersWeb

3,656 posts

174 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
SpidersWeb said:
Could they ask a question on it?

Asking a specific question would involve revealing someone else's criminal history and unless that individual has consented then surely that would be illegal (and even asking a question that was posed as a theoretical 'what if' question, but which had actually been based on reality would be asking for trouble).
Criminal conviction = public record.
Fair enough - so where can someone look up this public record of the details of any individual's driving record and convictions?

agtlaw

6,712 posts

207 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
SpidersWeb said:
Fair enough - so where can someone look up this public record of the details of any individual's driving record and convictions?
Contact the court.

SpidersWeb

3,656 posts

174 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
SpidersWeb said:
Fair enough - so where can someone look up this public record of the details of any individual's driving record and convictions?
Contact the court.
How do you know which one? Can you contact every court in the UK and say 'tell me about any convictions for Joe Bloggs in the last fifty years' and are they obliged to check the records?

agtlaw

6,712 posts

207 months

Pica-Pica

13,825 posts

85 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Public record does not equal public knowledge. Where does a requirement to search relatives’ criminal records start, and where does it end?

SpidersWeb

3,656 posts

174 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
To quote from that page -

"In general, you cannot search for records of criminal court cases by the names of defendants or anyone else involved in the case, though there are some exceptions to this, notably with Crown court records held at The National Archives. Usually you will need to know when and where a trial took place to have any hope of finding records."

A 'public record' which cannot be searched to find the information that would reveal someone had a driving conviction does for all practical purposes mean that there is no public record.

Pica-Pica said:
Public record does not equal public knowledge.
Exactly.


agtlaw

6,712 posts

207 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Pica-Pica said:
Public record does not equal public knowledge. Where does a requirement to search relatives’ criminal records start, and where does it end?
Correct. Public record does not mean readily available to anyone on some central database accessed via Google. It means public record.

agtlaw

6,712 posts

207 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
SpidersWeb said:
Exactly.
Drink driving is a criminal offence which leads to a criminal conviction and a public record will be available.

It isn’t a “minor road traffic offence.”

SpidersWeb

3,656 posts

174 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
Public record does not mean readily available to anyone on some central database accessed via Google. It means public record.
But the record isn't available to the public if the database isn't accessible by the public!

agtlaw said:
Drink driving is a criminal offence which leads to a criminal conviction and a public record will be available.

It isn’t a “minor road traffic offence.”
As before, how do you find out if an individual has ever had a criminal conviction if it is a 'public record'.

agtlaw

6,712 posts

207 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
Typical PH idiot to “double down” on the wrong answer. All arising from his nonsense post about asking permission!

agtlaw

6,712 posts

207 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
SpidersWeb said:
agtlaw said:
Public record does not mean readily available to anyone on some central database accessed via Google. It means public record.
But the record isn't available to the public if the database isn't accessible by the public!

agtlaw said:
Drink driving is a criminal offence which leads to a criminal conviction and a public record will be available.

It isn’t a “minor road traffic offence.”
As before, how do you find out if an individual has ever had a criminal conviction if it is a 'public record'.
Wrong. It is available to the public. Note the word readily.

Already answered this.





Greendubber

13,222 posts

204 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
Typical PH idiot to “double down” on the wrong answer. All arising from his nonsense post about asking permission!
That's how it works here isn't it?


OP - she'll be fine, it won't cause an issue for her. I hope her application goes well and she knows what she's letting herself in for.

If she has any questions etc then just ask on here, despite all the policing andaw experts that regularly post here there are actually a few bobbies/people that actually know what they're taking about that can try and help.

SpidersWeb

3,656 posts

174 months

Tuesday 23rd April
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
Typical PH idiot to “double down” on the wrong answer. All arising from his nonsense post about asking permission!
Got out of bed the wrong side this morning?

agtlaw said:
SpidersWeb said:
agtlaw said:
Public record does not mean readily available to anyone on some central database accessed via Google. It means public record.
But the record isn't available to the public if the database isn't accessible by the public!

agtlaw said:
Drink driving is a criminal offence which leads to a criminal conviction and a public record will be available.

It isn’t a “minor road traffic offence.”
As before, how do you find out if an individual has ever had a criminal conviction if it is a 'public record'.
Wrong. It is available to the public. Note the word readily.

Already answered this.
Yes it isn't 'readily' available to the public, it is simply not available to the public as it is impossible for a member of the public to discover it.

To argue that something that is not available to the public is a 'public record' is rather a stretch.