What spec was the Caterham Supersport R kit?

What spec was the Caterham Supersport R kit?

Author
Discussion

BertBert

19,061 posts

211 months

Sunday 30th July 2017
quotequote all
My car was an exec superlight. 1600SS with the bits - 6 speed, widetrack, big brakes, apollo, LSD. Full screen and paint.

I prefer it to the 1800 SLR for two main reasons. I found the 1600 engine to be more revvy and peppy. Seemed to respond better. I think the other main reason was the tyres. I had 205s on the SLR and 185s on the 1600SS. The narrower tyres gave a lighter drive and much more controllability in slippage.

Bert

Green George

Original Poster:

316 posts

251 months

Monday 31st July 2017
quotequote all
Bert. Thank you for the précis. More food for thought!
George

BertBert

19,061 posts

211 months

Tuesday 1st August 2017
quotequote all
np. Just to declare, I generally like the lower powered, smaller tyred caterhams, although I have not driven any of the modern high spec Duranail Caterhams. So I am probably biased!

Green George

Original Poster:

316 posts

251 months

Wednesday 2nd August 2017
quotequote all
BertBert said:
np. Just to declare, I generally like the lower powered, smaller tyred caterhams, although I have not driven any of the modern high spec Duranail Caterhams. So I am probably biased!
I also enjoy the fluidity and liveliness of a narrow tyred 7. IMHO large rear tyres on lower powered cars spoil the sense of driver involvement and in turn the fun. I have heard it said that at around 180+ bhp, it makes sense to go for the wider rear tyres on a 7.