New TVR confirmed

Author
Discussion

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

262 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
FWDRacer said:
Pigs fed and watered. Ready to fly.
Yep. Believe this when I see it. Which I hope I do.

There is no way this is going to be anything other than a £80-£100k niche market car.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

149 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
FWDRacer said:
Pigs fed and watered. Ready to fly.
It did make me think of this:


I hope it does come to fruition though.

DonkeyApple

55,378 posts

170 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
AOK said:
xRIEx said:
'Back to basics' V8 like the Mustang, which with Ford's massive resources and economies of scale (selling hundreds of thousands of them) has a starting price of £33k? I can't see a low volume manufacturer getting anywhere near that sort of price.
Correct me if I'm wrong but both Ginetta and Lotus sell 'no thrills' cars starting from £30k and buy their engines in as well.
Yes - Ginetta uses (IIRC) a mass-produced 150bhp 2l Duratec, an engine that is about 14 years old and under 2 grand for a crate engine (I believe); prices start at about £36k according to the Ginetta website.

The base Elise uses a mass-produced 1.6l 134bhp engine; prices start at about £31k.

The vapourware TVR uses a low volume production V8 created by a specialist engine manufacturer. They formerly sold the Sagaris at around £50k 10 years ago (£67-68k adjusted for inflation), £96-97K inflation adjusted for the Typhon.

Which bit of that suggests TVR can viably produce a bespoke-engined V8, low volume sports car for under £40k, or that they even want to?
Although, the TVR engine will just be a crate engine from the U.S., fettled enough by Cosworth to enable a Cosworth sticker over the Ford or GM one.

Plus, if you go and sit in a Ginetta you very much get the feeling that they are somewhat expensive given the state of them. And Lotus has a massive facility and years of experience to build their product. But what both have in common is that no one in the UK wants one. If you are planning to sell purely in the UK to start with, I cannot see the commercial sense in targeting your product at a client base that catagorically doesn't exist.

zebedee

4,589 posts

279 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
ChimpOnGas said:
On the face of it this makes a very credible read, they do seem to have a proper plan here.

While we're talking creditability it doesn't get much better than Gordon Murray__ and __Cosworth, both iconic British brands in their own right its clear Les Edgar wants to keep the TVR brand British and will be relaunching the marque on that basis.

Les says he's well funded, and no doubt there are a millions involved but this is still peanuts in the world of car production and TVR will always be a niche market low volume producer of sports cars that ultimately have a very limited market.

History is littered with low volume British sports car manufacturers that have gone to the wall; but not all die, Caterham & Ginetta both survive mostly supported by a one marque race series which is a far more profitable business model than simply building road cars.

Morgan live solely off road car production but they only really keep going because they're so tiny they can immediately respond to small changes in demand. Only Lotus stands out as the nearest match to what Les is trying to create in company size, but he'll be fighting for the same customer base and it does seem Lotus themselves struggle to stay alive.

Is there really room for another Lotus?

Les needs to be careful entering the market as a medium sized low volume sports car producer as this is by far the riskiest bracket to be in, the safety & emissions legislation imposed by the European Union alone means car production is a very expensive business these days.

All the big boys are developing cars at least five years in advance, the new TVR may well be a forward thinking design but the truth is it'll almost certainly be non-compliant withing three to five years of its release. Building cars in this day & age is a business that only really suits the big multinational established producers because only they are shifting enough units to generate the revenue required to reinvest in the development of future models & engines that will meet the next series of cripplingly strict regulations.

And this legislation challenge is relentless, it never stops, the regs just get harder & harder every few years.

I'm a massive fan of the TVR brand, I love the whole British underdog story and the working class hero product they've always tried to create. But if I put my business head on I would not be queuing up to invest or get involved in such a company.

Can they really survive for longer than five years?

I really hope they can and they may well know something I don't, but the British low volume sports car industry has always been built on a foundation of passion, tradition & romance..... and unfortunately you don't build a credible long term sustainable business plan on on passion, tradition & romance..

You build a credible business plan on profit & loss yes

Edited by ChimpOnGas on Wednesday 3rd June 09:13
yawn. What is this, the Financial Times? No it is pistonheads, enthusiasm please.

dunnoreally

967 posts

109 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
My day has just been made. I don't know if they'll succeed or not, but damn, I wish them all the luck in the world.

zebedee

4,589 posts

279 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
dinkel said:
To survive TVR needs to start all over again. Most car enthusiasts have never heard of TVR. In Europe they are rarely seen on the roads. In the UK it's another story. Car peeps know their history. On the Continent ... not so.

To get a piece of the market dropping a new TVR there isn't enough. The TVR brand is just a 3 letter name with a strange history.

Better try starting up with an angry MX5 which is a Boxter rival. Then make money and get a serious position in the market and grow. It's not 2004 anymore. Eleven years ago!

This story smells like another empty episode in the ongoing TVR saga. But then: crossing fingers this might actually lift off.
Maybe they aren't doing it to try and make millions out of people?

soad

32,903 posts

177 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
As long as they're still held together by super glue and Northern charm. hehe

Wheeler knew how to push customers buttons - lightweight bodies and huge, old-school V8 engines - and the company thrived.

smilo996

2,795 posts

171 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
TVR, Gordon Murray, Cosworth, V8, UK.

What could be better.

That is presumably why Murray was being slightly smug but coy on the Motor Sport Mag podcast about iStream.

Good news.

AOK

2,297 posts

167 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
AOK said:
xRIEx said:
'Back to basics' V8 like the Mustang, which with Ford's massive resources and economies of scale (selling hundreds of thousands of them) has a starting price of £33k? I can't see a low volume manufacturer getting anywhere near that sort of price.
Correct me if I'm wrong but both Ginetta and Lotus sell 'no thrills' cars starting from £30k and buy their engines in as well.
Yes - Ginetta uses (IIRC) a mass-produced 150bhp 2l Duratec, an engine that is about 14 years old and under 2 grand for a crate engine (I believe); prices start at about £36k according to the Ginetta website.

The base Elise uses a mass-produced 1.6l 134bhp engine; prices start at about £31k.

The vapourware TVR uses a low volume production V8 created by a specialist engine manufacturer. They formerly sold the Sagaris at around £50k 10 years ago (£67-68k adjusted for inflation), £96-97K inflation adjusted for the Typhon.

Which bit of that suggests TVR can viably produce a bespoke-engined V8, low volume sports car for under £40k, or that they even want to?
Perhaps you are right regarding the lower segment. But I still think (and have said prior) the cash cow in my eyes would not be a £100k car, but a £60-70k car. In fact, I'd go as far as to say that not offering a sub £100k car would totally remove the TVR DNA from this proposition - it should be a blue collar British supercar with a sports car price tag.

T350c's launched at £38,500. That's about £54-55k adjusted for inflation... another £10k for a better engine and more sophisticated technology? I see it as doable and would rather see them focus on this than an £100k offering. Plenty of smaller companies have attempted British £100k 'supercars' in the last few years and most have failed.

NailedOn

3,114 posts

236 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
dunnoreally said:
My day has just been made. I don't know if they'll succeed or not, but damn, I wish them all the luck in the world.
My sentiment too.
I wish them well but may give it a year or two before buying one to give them time to fix the teething troubles.

zooooom

1,310 posts

261 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
Excellent news all round just a small word of caution.
The info I was told is that the new car my not look exactly like the computer images that are floating around at present.
When they 3D printed the cad design for the new car it looked ‘awful’ in the flesh.
So they have gone back to the traditional method of creating the prototype out of clay.
Also engines have been built and are currently on the tested bed - dyno.



Edited by zooooom on Wednesday 3rd June 11:50

JLF

418 posts

202 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
From Murray... “The days when Britain ruled the waves with Triumph and Austin Healey and MG and stuff: that was just fantastic. Those weren't high performance cars but they were fun cars. Now that we've got all the speed cameras and all the rest of it now, I honestly think if we could build an affordable, stiff, great handling, good looking little sports car that would be a better achievement than doing another supercar. Actually, it’s a thing I want to do most of all.” "An affordable sports car; a sort of modern Healey Sprite, if you like"

That's great but give it 470+bhp biggrin

Wills2

22,858 posts

176 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
It did make me think of this:


I hope it does come to fruition though.
Excellent I'd not seen that before, but it rings true.



dinkel

26,954 posts

259 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
AOK said:
900T-R said:
dinkel said:
Most car enthusiasts have never heard of TVR.
Really? I've yet to find one that can be classed as a car enthusiast. Arrive anywhere where car guys and gals gather, in a TVR = instant recognition.
Just look at the Pistonheads forum categories... how many sub categories do you see in the 'TVR' section in comparison to other manufacturers! Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think PH is a car enthusiast website!
Europe isn't the UK. At the last DSR our group bumped into a Tuscan. Now there's a group of enthusiasts and only one or two had seen one before. Folks with a used Boxter on their wishlist won't consider anything TVR. Unless they are way outside the Top Gear category. The following is peanuts compared to benchmark fans.

AOK said:
They need a £30-40k 'back to basics' roadster to blow Ginetta and Lotus out of the water. I'd see this as their car to attract younger owners, track day enthusiasts, Chimaera drivers of old etc. Little in the way of creature comforts, just a well-handling, rwd sports car with an entry level of tune to their V8 proposition.
Let's start from there. And be realistic: there's more choice today then there was 11 years ago.

3795mpower

486 posts

131 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
Trevor would indeed approve.

I approve too.

Just hope it makes it onto the streets.

I suppose low volume still means they can dodge a few expensive regulatory requirements.....

BrabusMog

20,179 posts

187 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
This is the first time I have read something where I believe it could happen. I still think the Sagaris is the best looking car ever made.

I've already checked with the missus that I'll be allowed to buy one if it does happen and she said yes smile

dkennedyvxt

242 posts

235 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
Not posted in a very long time but this has made my day. Best of luck to them. My Cerbera 4.5 was the least reliable car i've ever owned but by far the most fun and never stopped producing the grin factor.

ecs0set

2,471 posts

285 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
The is good news! thumbup

However is it just me that thinks Gordon Murray can be a bit of a twit sometimes?

article said:
At heart it uses conventional steel tubes but the composite panels are bonded to it, creating a lightweight and rigid structure.
Apparently Gordon thinks that the TVR backbone chassis is very weak so surprising to hear they are using a similar idea, even with the bonded elements: https://youtu.be/lqTbdmbL7mU?t=5m2s

Edited by ecs0set on Wednesday 3rd June 12:47

Niffty951

2,333 posts

229 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
From TVR website:

- V8, front-engined with manual transmission & rear wheel drive
- Incredible value for money

Please, if you could just avoid customer satisfaction surveys and be the first company since ..well TVR to achieve these two aims again, it's a done deal!

It doesn't need fancy tech, it doesn't need lane control/electric crap/dynamic anything.

It just needs a back to basics, impolitely tuned V8, RWD with LSD, Manual gearbox and an ergonomic place to sit and drive it.

I'll just pop to the classifieds and get a T350 to celebrate while I wait.

Limpet

6,318 posts

162 months

Wednesday 3rd June 2015
quotequote all
suffolk009 said:
Murray, Cosworth, TVR.

It's like a wet dream.
This.

And successful businessmen running it! It's hard not to get a little bit excited.