New TVR still under wraps! (Vol. 2)
Discussion
phazed said:
They are completely different.
One is mid engined and resembles a supercar the other a GT car.
I would feel a right plum driving the Corvette! The TVR, you could get away with.
Anyone who drives a supercar in England must be on some sort of register!
Why would you feel a plum driving a Corvette, is it an age thing? My money my choice, anyway I like plums. 😆One is mid engined and resembles a supercar the other a GT car.
I would feel a right plum driving the Corvette! The TVR, you could get away with.
Anyone who drives a supercar in England must be on some sort of register!
Edited by TravelsVeryRapid on Sunday 6th June 20:30
Imran999 said:
My Cerbera was parked outside a local tyre-centre and a new C8 Corvette ended up parking near it.
The tyre centre employees came out to have a look, and (all except one) favoured the Cerbera.
Personally, I thought the C8 looked bonkers, if a little origami.
That's not fair! So its Cerb over C8 then. The tyre centre employees came out to have a look, and (all except one) favoured the Cerbera.
Personally, I thought the C8 looked bonkers, if a little origami.
So, Cerb or new Griffith?
Edited by N7GTX on Monday 7th June 14:25
I was reading Sprint magazine this morning which reminded me this farce is still going on. If that factory does ever happen then their new Griffith will be completely the wrong car to build. It'll be dead on arrival.
If they could get a license, they should get hold of Tesla floorpans and adopt the old coachbuilder business model. A new car with Tesla performance, range and proven technology with a beautiful body & interior could sell in enough volume to make a bit of profit. It would at least revive the name and bring some news interest. Borrowing std car parts and re-using them to build sportscars is what TVR has always done.
If they could get a license, they should get hold of Tesla floorpans and adopt the old coachbuilder business model. A new car with Tesla performance, range and proven technology with a beautiful body & interior could sell in enough volume to make a bit of profit. It would at least revive the name and bring some news interest. Borrowing std car parts and re-using them to build sportscars is what TVR has always done.
gifdy said:
I was reading Sprint magazine this morning which reminded me this farce is still going on. If that factory does ever happen then their new Griffith will be completely the wrong car to build. It'll be dead on arrival.
If they could get a license, they should get hold of Tesla floorpans and adopt the old coachbuilder business model. A new car with Tesla performance, range and proven technology with a beautiful body & interior could sell in enough volume to make a bit of profit. It would at least revive the name and bring some news interest. Borrowing std car parts and re-using them to build sportscars is what TVR has always done.
Electric was suggested toward the start of this sorry story - about 3 or 4 years ago. They persisted with their destined to fail approach despite their business model becoming less and less practicable due to all the various issues and challenges. If they want to stand a chance they need to change tact quickly. Not just the design and power train but also their business model. If they could get a license, they should get hold of Tesla floorpans and adopt the old coachbuilder business model. A new car with Tesla performance, range and proven technology with a beautiful body & interior could sell in enough volume to make a bit of profit. It would at least revive the name and bring some news interest. Borrowing std car parts and re-using them to build sportscars is what TVR has always done.
Gazzab said:
gifdy said:
I was reading Sprint magazine this morning which reminded me this farce is still going on. If that factory does ever happen then their new Griffith will be completely the wrong car to build. It'll be dead on arrival.
If they could get a license, they should get hold of Tesla floorpans and adopt the old coachbuilder business model. A new car with Tesla performance, range and proven technology with a beautiful body & interior could sell in enough volume to make a bit of profit. It would at least revive the name and bring some news interest. Borrowing std car parts and re-using them to build sportscars is what TVR has always done.
Electric was suggested toward the start of this sorry story - about 3 or 4 years ago. They persisted with their destined to fail approach despite their business model becoming less and less practicable due to all the various issues and challenges. If they want to stand a chance they need to change tact quickly. Not just the design and power train but also their business model. If they could get a license, they should get hold of Tesla floorpans and adopt the old coachbuilder business model. A new car with Tesla performance, range and proven technology with a beautiful body & interior could sell in enough volume to make a bit of profit. It would at least revive the name and bring some news interest. Borrowing std car parts and re-using them to build sportscars is what TVR has always done.
Gassing Station | General TVR Stuff & Gossip | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff