Griffith 500 v 500HC

Author
Discussion

Classic Chim

Original Poster:

12,424 posts

150 months

Saturday 2nd March
quotequote all
I notice for the first time in 15 years trolling these pages you can get a 500 or 500hc.
What’s the difference. Higher compression.
Whats the differences in build in the two engines.
Thanks

macdeb

8,512 posts

256 months

Saturday 2nd March
quotequote all
I seem to recall it being Highlift Cam. Of course we all know neither make the claimed outragious figures quoted.

Classic Chim

Original Poster:

12,424 posts

150 months

Saturday 2nd March
quotequote all
Hi Mac.
It’s good to hear from you brother. Still playing the six string ?

Hmm. I wonder what markings are on the HC cam assuming the 500 is just a 885 cam. 216 as it was once known… I think?

Oh I dunno I’m sure Dom could built at least one engine that had that power for “cough” demonstration purposes.

sixor8

6,299 posts

269 months

Saturday 2nd March
quotequote all
I'm not aware that there was a difference but perhaps the 'HC' was for the 340 bhp era?

The Griff 500 was advertised as having 320bhp in the early days and it was printed in the owner's manual. At some point (I'm unsure when, perhaps the mid 1990s when it went to the serpentine engine?), it was printed as 340bhp (we all know to take those figures with a pinch of stuff rolleyes).

I've read somewhere (apologies for vagueness, I think it's in the TVR club members pages but I can't access them) that it was dialled back to 320 bhp in abut '97 for smoother running.

Classic Chim

Original Poster:

12,424 posts

150 months

Saturday 2nd March
quotequote all
The figures appear to be derived from some calculations based on say 275 at the wheels with 17% percentage added to account for road train losses to come to a fly wheel figure of 321.75. The actual road train losses might not even be 10% but 15-17% has been a figure used for years!
Now on a dyno and vicious timing advance you might have got those numbers but the engine wouldn’t last long but it might last long enough to confirm the numbers before inevitably tuning it down to a safer level.
You only have to do it once and write it down for it to become Tvr fact. hehe




macdeb

8,512 posts

256 months

Saturday 2nd March
quotequote all
Classic Chim said:
Hi Mac.
It’s good to hear from you brother. Still playing the six string ?

Hmm. I wonder what markings are on the HC cam assuming the 500 is just a 885 cam. 216 as it was once known… I think?

Oh I dunno I’m sure Dom could built at least one engine that had that power for “cough” demonstration purposes.
wavey hiya bloke, yeah still playing, new songs, busy with gigs, all good. Must catch up this year beer

Classic Chim

Original Poster:

12,424 posts

150 months

Saturday 2nd March
quotequote all
macdeb said:
wavey hiya bloke, yeah still playing, new songs, busy with gigs, all good. Must catch up this year beer
Good news. Really pleased to hear it.
Hey folks Macs got a great voice and star levels of stage presence. biggrin

Do you still own one of Woking’s finest cars Mac.
Brilliant brilliant cars.
Flash us a picture of it even if you haven’t got it anymore. I understand those cars way better now. beer

Edited by Classic Chim on Saturday 2nd March 14:26

Belle427

8,984 posts

234 months

Saturday 2nd March
quotequote all
HC is high lift cam.
From what ive read it was just sales guff on the 500s and the engines are all the same.

GTRene

16,590 posts

225 months

Saturday 2nd March
quotequote all
Belle427 said:
HC is high lift cam.
From what ive read it was just sales guff on the 500s and the engines are all the same.
lol, I thought High Compression hehe

LucyP

1,699 posts

60 months

Sunday 3rd March
quotequote all
This was all discussed here, on various threads from 2004.

All the 500's were HC (High Compression), because they used the HC heads from the Morgan Plus 8.

Belle427

8,984 posts

234 months

Sunday 3rd March
quotequote all
LucyP said:
This was all discussed here, on various threads from 2004.

All the 500's were HC (High Compression), because they used the HC heads from the Morgan Plus 8.
Do some more research, its been discussed to death on here over the years and those that know say its always been High lift cam, the same as the Chimaera 400HC.

Classic Chim

Original Poster:

12,424 posts

150 months

Sunday 3rd March
quotequote all
The confusion between the meaning of HC is the root cause of this debate.
As a youngster I was led to believe HC stood for High Compression ( rightly or wrongly)
Then came to the Tvr world and soon realised it meant High lift Cam and this was confirmed to me by the one that knows many moons ago.

I’m not sure what Morgan heads have to do with it so a link to a post referencing Morgan heads would be helpful to the community.

I presume Lucy means Tvr used the same development work that Morgan had taken advantage of which both John Eales, Tvr Power and others were doing at the time?

Early 500 cars might have had the most aggressive cam but in essence they were all HC High lift Cam

There is no real difference between a HC badged 500 engine and a non badged one and after 30 years or more, if it now has a Taraka cam or similar it has all the properties of the best cam available to maintain decent power and running character. Those old cams have been superseded and people have put more aggressive cams of their choice in these cars in for years now.
HC 400 was to identify 400 engines fitted with higher lift cams.



Edited by Classic Chim on Sunday 3rd March 10:05

GreenV8S

30,208 posts

285 months

Sunday 3rd March
quotequote all
LucyP said:
This was all discussed here, on various threads from 2004.

All the 500's were HC (High Compression), because they used the HC heads from the Morgan Plus 8.
If you're trying to say that HC in TVR Rover V8 engine designations stands for High Compression, I think you're wrong. If you think differently, perhaps you could link to those authoritative threads you mention.

The TVR factory and dealers have consistently used HC to refer to High lift Cam as far as I'm aware.

Rover changed the cylinder head design around 1994 to allow the use of a thick composite gasket instead of the original thin tin one. This would have been during the original Griffith 500 production years. The later heads were made shorter to maintain the same overall chamber height, chamber volume and compression ratio. You can also deck the early heads to allow the thicker composite gaskets to be used without lowering the CR. Perhaps this is what you're thinking of. This is not the difference between HC and non-HC engines - the same CR was maintained before and after the change.


macdeb

8,512 posts

256 months

Sunday 3rd March
quotequote all
Classic Chim said:
macdeb said:
wavey hiya bloke, yeah still playing, new songs, busy with gigs, all good. Must catch up this year beer
Good news. Really pleased to hear it.
Hey folks Macs got a great voice and star levels of stage presence. biggrin

Do you still own one of Woking’s finest cars Mac.
Brilliant brilliant cars.
Flash us a picture of it even if you haven’t got it anymore. I understand those cars way better now. beer

Edited by Classic Chim on Saturday 2nd March 14:26
You sir are too kind. Yes, still got the car after nearly 3.5 years! Where's time go? and it still amazes me every single time I get in it.



Edited by macdeb on Sunday 3rd March 14:33

LucyP

1,699 posts

60 months

Sunday 3rd March
quotequote all
HC High Compression. If it stood for High Lift it would be HL, not HC. It's basic abbreviation stuff.

Here's your proof. Look at the Miscellaneous Engine List. Look at the 2nd entry. Look at the compression ratio. Compare it with the long list of other engines of various capacities, for various worldwide markets.

As I said. HC. High Compression

I suppose it could stand for Hydraulic Cam, but since all Rover V8 variants used a hydraulic cam, it would have been a bit of a pointless badge.

https://rimmerbros.com/c/Rover-V8-Engine-Numbers

Edited by LucyP on Sunday 3rd March 15:53

sixor8

6,299 posts

269 months

Sunday 3rd March
quotequote all
Carry on digging..... It has NEVER meant high compression on TVRs. It's High lift Camshaft.

GreenV8S

30,208 posts

285 months

Sunday 3rd March
quotequote all
LucyP said:
HC High Compression. If it stood for High Lift it would be HL, not HC. It's basic abbreviation stuff.
That's your assumption, but it's a false assumption.

GTRene

16,590 posts

225 months

Sunday 3rd March
quotequote all
also what TVR engine's came also with BV Big Valve's, I know a 430 BV I once owned, but I also know that there were more variants, but I can not remember (not saying that much though hehe ) seeing such in the 500

Classic Chim

Original Poster:

12,424 posts

150 months

Sunday 3rd March
quotequote all
macdeb said:
You sir are too kind. Yes, still got the car after nearly 3.5 years! Where's time go? and it still amazes me every single time I get in it.



Edited by macdeb on Sunday 3rd March 14:33
Fantastic mate.

steviegtr

17 posts

7 months

Sunday 3rd March
quotequote all
I'll have my coat ready , but never in 60 years in motors have ever heard a HC not be High compression. Surely Dom at TVR can answer this one for once & for all.
Steve.