Classics dwarfed by moderns

Author
Discussion

RichB

51,640 posts

285 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
What the hell is that ugly great thing? eek

ess

791 posts

179 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
RichB said:
What the hell is that ugly great thing? eek
I believe it's a 'coupe' version of the Merc SUV in my previous post.

Who ate all the pies ?

S

Pericoloso

44,044 posts

164 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
It's a GLE I think .

The smaller GLC is much nicer looking.

DoubleD

22,154 posts

109 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
Something doesnt look right about that picture

fausTVR

1,442 posts

151 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
That's eye popping, got to be one of the best examples on here.

DoubleD

22,154 posts

109 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
ess said:
When did cars start getting so fat ?
Is it a reflection of our 'powerfully built' populace ?

S

I thought this didnt look right. The xjs is just 8 centimetres shorter than the merc.

ess

791 posts

179 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
fausTVR said:
That's eye popping, got to be one of the best examples on here.
Perspective distortion partly to blame, but still shockingly obese.

S

DoubleD

22,154 posts

109 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
ess said:
fausTVR said:
That's eye popping, got to be one of the best examples on here.
Perspective distortion partly to blame, but still shockingly obese.

S
At 8 cm longer and 25 cm wider, the merc makes far better use of its footprint than the Jag.

Looks like a dogs dinner though.

ess

791 posts

179 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
DoubleD said:
At 8 cm longer and 25 cm wider, the merc makes far better use of its footprint than the Jag.

Looks like a dogs dinner though.
Is 'better use of footprint' the new 'powerfully built' ? hehe

S

DoubleD

22,154 posts

109 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
ess said:
DoubleD said:
At 8 cm longer and 25 cm wider, the merc makes far better use of its footprint than the Jag.

Looks like a dogs dinner though.
Is 'better use of footprint' the new 'powerfully built' ? hehe

S
No, just better use of road space.

Gompo

4,415 posts

259 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
Couldnt resist taking this one.


Pericoloso

44,044 posts

164 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
Honey I shrunk the Sapphire....biggrin

Lily the Pink

5,783 posts

171 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
DoubleD said:
No, just better use of road space.
Define "better". Maybe in terms of efficiency, but not (IMHO) aesthetics.

DoubleD

22,154 posts

109 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
Lily the Pink said:
DoubleD said:
No, just better use of road space.
Define "better". Maybe in terms of efficiency, but not (IMHO) aesthetics.
I agree

dundarach

5,062 posts

229 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
Gompo said:
Couldnt resist taking this one.

The perspective trick is getting a bit daft now...however don't you think....

robemcdonald

8,813 posts

197 months

Tuesday 25th June 2019
quotequote all
Gompo said:
Couldnt resist taking this one.

I’m just shocked at how much bigger the Sierra is than the white BMW 4 series.

I would have thought a new BM would have been a lot bigger.

Ambleton

6,662 posts

193 months

Wednesday 26th June 2019
quotequote all
The things that are making new cars look larger are the wheels, the rounded fronts, and the higher beltline.

Back in the 70s/80s 15" wheels were seen as huge, ironically if you go far enough back they start getting big again. 21" wires were not uncommon, and they go substantially bigger besides.

The rounded fronts mean that you have way more real estate at the front of the car by virtue of curvature. The grill can be bigger, the lights now wrap around the sides and/or up onto the bonnet. Before, with the square fronts, the lights were resided to the front flatter surfaces, with a grill squeezed between them.

The biggest impact is probably the beltline height. This means that cars have way more body colour, making them look a lot bigger. The door sides in new saloons come up to your shoulder, cacooning you. The bonnets and boots have naturally got higher along with the beltline, partly as a result of taller engines, impact safety, bigger wheels etc. Making the impressions that cars have got bigger. They absolutely have, but not nearly as much as it looks.

The biggest genuine growth area for cars is width. You can immediately tell this simply by looking at the interior. The doors are probably 10" wide, the centre console is probably 12" wide and the seats are wider too. You hop in a late 70s family car and the doors are wafer thin and theres little or no centre console, just a handbrake and a gear lever.

thegreenhell

15,427 posts

220 months

Wednesday 26th June 2019
quotequote all
robemcdonald said:
Gompo said:
Couldnt resist taking this one.

I’m just shocked at how much bigger the Sierra is than the white BMW 4 series.

I would have thought a new BM would have been a lot bigger.
Yeah but that Audi is almost as big as the entire row of houses behind.

RichB

51,640 posts

285 months

Wednesday 26th June 2019
quotequote all
robemcdonald said:
Gompo said:
Couldnt resist taking this one.

I’m just shocked at how much bigger the Sierra is than the white BMW 4 series. I would have thought a new BM would have been a lot bigger.
Is there a BMW in that picture? Admittedly there's a lot of white cars that look similar so there may be.

DoubleD

22,154 posts

109 months

Wednesday 26th June 2019
quotequote all
RichB said:
robemcdonald said:
Gompo said:
Couldnt resist taking this one.

I’m just shocked at how much bigger the Sierra is than the white BMW 4 series. I would have thought a new BM would have been a lot bigger.
Is there a BMW in that picture? Admittedly there's a lot of white cars that look similar so there may be.
Look behind the sierra