Classics dwarfed by moderns

Author
Discussion

RDMcG

19,211 posts

208 months

Wednesday 21st November 2012
quotequote all


Below a few I took myself:








10Dasein

18 posts

147 months

Wednesday 21st November 2012
quotequote all
By chance I spotted a nice info-graphic on this today:
http://www.coolinfographics.com/blog/2012/11/9/car...

Deals nicely with both classics/modern, 911s, sector-shift and even seems to have version of the previously posted Honda S2000/800 pic.

roscozs

477 posts

182 months

Wednesday 21st November 2012
quotequote all

CR6ZZ

1,313 posts

146 months

Wednesday 21st November 2012
quotequote all
Lifted from another page....


lowdrag

12,911 posts

214 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all
Ah, the GT40 and the GT43!

Agoogy

7,274 posts

249 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all
Some really good pics here..the Boxster, Abarth, Clubman/Coutryman and GT40 especially...

I really want my GF to buy an Abarth...looks so good.

spogxy

138 posts

148 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all
MrMoonyMan said:
Fantastic picture thumbup

I initially loved reading through this thread (not been on PH for a while) some great pics.

The casual statement 'modern cars are getting bigger' surely cannot be denied I thought, there are so many examples.

Weird how it then got bogged down with anal posturing, flip-charts, statistics, fiscally equivalent groupings, market rating...blah blah blah frown

Please keep posting quality pics like the one above from MrMoonyman above and ignore the tedium!
Thanks OP for a great thread.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all















Agoogy

7,274 posts

249 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all
"Yanks always make big cars" shock hehe

Only now the wheels are in proportion....

Actually raises an interesting point though....is the whole 'cars are growing' thing a European issue?
The yanks haven't grown so much because they were always big?....us Europeans have just caught up?
scratchchin

Edited by Agoogy on Thursday 22 November 11:46

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all







spogxy

138 posts

148 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all
spogxy said:
Mmmm nothing like parking the MK1 golf 20-30 feet further away from the camera is there tongue out

biggrin

CDP

7,465 posts

255 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Mmmm nothing like parking the MK1 golf 20-30 feet further away from the camera is there tongue out

biggrin
True but if you park the MK1 directly in front of the new model the difference would be even more obvious.

But the real difference would be at the weighbridge.

Agoogy

7,274 posts

249 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all
it is half a metre longer, 20cm wider and 10cm taller and a whopping 600kg heavier though wink

tis intersting the difference a picture makes...in one shot the XK looks similar to an E-type in the next the XK is noticeably bigger...

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all
I agree there is a big difference in size/weight and power from MK1 to whatever MK they are on now. (although as said earlier I don't personally consider them the same class of car, only the same name).

But it's amazing what tricks you can do with a camera to exaggerate the point a bit.


300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all

spogxy

138 posts

148 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Mmmm nothing like parking the MK1 golf 20-30 feet further away from the camera is there tongue out

biggrin
So you seriously think they are roughly the same size?

Looking at your profile you seem like a knowledgeable chap, with lots of years of petrolheadedness(!) but I really don't get where you're coming from in this particular vehicular thread confused

Original MK1 polo vs modern Polo
Original Mini vs modern bloated corpse Mini, look at the CoUNTryman!
Even 'modern' cars such as the bubble shaped Corsa have been inflated over the last few years.

Why so obtuse me old petrol head?
And stop it regarding the 'classes of cars' no one cares!! nerd



Agoogy

7,274 posts

249 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all
300 cares and he's allowed to wink
I think he thinks that in the 70's the type and class of people that bought a Golf are not the same people who are the type or class of person that buy a Golf now...

I'd argue that taking into account 'progress' they remain the same, the buyer's income has grown...they have grown and their respective car has grown...

And because each class of car grows they are still called by the names they started with, in as much as small/medium and large etc...

There is no denying the cars have got bigger and this has allowed 'smaller' sub class models, but for me that hasn't stopped the Fiesta being in a certain 'class'...small in that case..

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all
spogxy said:
So you seriously think they are roughly the same size?
lol no eek

Check out my post 2 above yours wink

spogxy said:
Looking at your profile you seem like a knowledgeable chap, with lots of years of petrolheadedness(!) but I really don't get where you're coming from in this particular vehicular thread confused

Original MK1 polo vs modern Polo
Original Mini vs modern bloated corpse Mini, look at the CoUNTryman!
Even 'modern' cars such as the bubble shaped Corsa have been inflated over the last few years.

Why so obtuse me old petrol head?
And stop it regarding the 'classes of cars' no one cares!! nerd
It's just my view that the cars are no longer aimed at the same sector or customer (that view might well be wrong however).

But for instance take the Countryman. In it's past incarnation it was a Mini estate with "barn doors" and exterior wood trim.

Today's Countryman is a 5 door 4x4/compact SUV. And apart from the name shares nothing with the original. And I believe fully aimed at a completely different demographic for a completely different use.


I believe the same is true with many cars (Focus, Fiesta, Golf, etc etc). Although the shift in market and target audience has been more subtle and a smaller shift.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Thursday 22nd November 2012
quotequote all
Agoogy said:
300 cares and he's allowed to wink
I think he thinks that in the 70's the type and class of people that bought a Golf are not the same people who are the type or class of person that buy a Golf now...

I'd argue that taking into account 'progress' they remain the same, the buyer's income has grown...they have grown and their respective car has grown...

And because each class of car grows they are still called by the names they started with, in as much as small/medium and large etc...

There is no denying the cars have got bigger and this has allowed 'smaller' sub class models, but for me that hasn't stopped the Fiesta being in a certain 'class'...small in that case..
I suppose it'd be interesting to see what car model has changed the most over the years and undergone the biggest transformation and size increase?