COOL CLASSIC CAR SPOTTERS POST!!! Vol 2
Discussion
Strela said:
Blown2CV said:
Careful, now. You don't want want gothatway coming after you with his assumptions. I see your point about the panel gaps, but it's not true of all old Jags. This one's a beaut.
And, it can be noted, this one is correctly parked, rather than being dumped half on the pavement in Somerset by some boater wearing superannuated paedophile (just an assumption about classic Jag enthusiasts!)
85Carrera said:
Back in the day I wouldn't be able to see past an Ur Quattro or 944 if I was in the market for one of these, yet now, 30 years later, I'm quite drawn to a V6 Turbo GTA. Fabulous looking things. Were they all mouth and no trousers though? I assume it wouldn't see which way a 944 went.Dapster said:
Back in the day I wouldn't be able to see past an Ur Quattro or 944 if I was in the market for one of these, yet now, 30 years later, I'm quite drawn to a V6 Turbo GTA. Fabulous looking things. Were they all mouth and no trousers though? I assume it wouldn't see which way a 944 went.
With the six cylinder engine dangling just in front of the rear bumper, it was more of a 911 alternative than the 944. It's a very capable sports car. I ran one in conjunction with an Esprit Turbo SE back in the day. The Esprit was quicker off the line, but they both had a wonderfully communicative chassis and impressive grip. The GTA was much easier to live with though and was most definitely the everyday car of the two. Light steering, easy clutch and cabin space were all plus points.
Edited by Cold on Friday 29th June 03:24
Gassing Station | Classic Cars and Yesterday's Heroes | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff