Classics left to die/rotting pics - Vol 2
Discussion
Rob 131 Sport said:
bumskins said:
Yertis said:
I’ve been more or less loyal to Audi ever since.
Oh dear, you have my sympathies.Maybe they haven’t driven them


Bannock said:
I go past that place every day, but in a car, and never thought to stop to photograph it for this forum. There are a couple of dying vehicles I think.
Lots of potential, that house...
Mr Saddo here stopped and walked back. If PH receive a letter of complaint from the Baptist Church parking warden, I'd be grateful if everyone could deny everything.Lots of potential, that house...
Yes, there are three or four houses together, all run down. I wondered if a developer is buying them up.

Is this one of the dying vehicles you meant?
Rob 131 Sport said:
bumskins said:
Yertis said:
I’ve been more or less loyal to Audi ever since.
Oh dear, you have my sympathies.Maybe they haven’t driven them

To this day Audi insist on placing their engines entirely ahead of the front axle, which gives the cars chronic understeer.
(Back in the day, the engines were mounted so far forwards that the radiator had to sit next to the engine, rather than ahead of it!)
4rephill said:
Understeer, followed by understeer, followed by a big dose of understeer,
<snip>
Having owned several Audis (mostly A4s, three of which were Quattros), I never experienced understeer, so I call BS on this one.<snip>
I have also owned various BMWs (and do still own one), had various other front wheel drive cars (Skoda vRS) and they handles just the same as the Audis.
IMHO the understeer thing is a big myth.
TonyRPH said:
Having owned several Audis (mostly A4s, three of which were Quattros), I never experienced understeer, so I call BS on this one.
I have also owned various BMWs (and do still own one), had various other front wheel drive cars (Skoda vRS) and they handles just the same as the Audis.
IMHO the understeer thing is a big myth.
Mate Audi's understeer!I have also owned various BMWs (and do still own one), had various other front wheel drive cars (Skoda vRS) and they handles just the same as the Audis.
IMHO the understeer thing is a big myth.
4rephill said:
Rob 131 Sport said:
bumskins said:
Yertis said:
I’ve been more or less loyal to Audi ever since.
Oh dear, you have my sympathies.Maybe they haven’t driven them

To this day Audi insist on placing their engines entirely ahead of the front axle, which gives the cars chronic understeer.
(Back in the day, the engines were mounted so far forwards that the radiator had to sit next to the engine, rather than ahead of it!)
All of them have excellent driving dynamics. I agree that older Audi’s that I’ve owned in the past weren’t as enjoyable to drive as contemporary BMW’s.
Shezbo said:
TonyRPH said:
Having owned several Audis (mostly A4s, three of which were Quattros), I never experienced understeer, so I call BS on this one.
I have also owned various BMWs (and do still own one), had various other front wheel drive cars (Skoda vRS) and they handles just the same as the Audis.
IMHO the understeer thing is a big myth.
Mate Audi's understeer!I have also owned various BMWs (and do still own one), had various other front wheel drive cars (Skoda vRS) and they handles just the same as the Audis.
IMHO the understeer thing is a big myth.
I've had numerous quattros and have always found them to behave well. The one front wheel drive Audi I had I got rid of quickly. Compared to the quattros it was useless.
/like to press on but not a driving god
Shezbo said:
TonyRPH said:
Having owned several Audis (mostly A4s, three of which were Quattros), I never experienced understeer, so I call BS on this one.
I have also owned various BMWs (and do still own one), had various other front wheel drive cars (Skoda vRS) and they handles just the same as the Audis.
IMHO the understeer thing is a big myth.
Mate Audi's understeer!I have also owned various BMWs (and do still own one), had various other front wheel drive cars (Skoda vRS) and they handles just the same as the Audis.
IMHO the understeer thing is a big myth.
Nearly all cars are designed to understeer as a safety feature.
A Peugeot 406 Coupe had worse understeer than the various Audis I've had.
TonyRPH said:
My own personal experience is that they don't understeer (or at least, no worse than many other cars).
Nearly all cars are designed to understeer as a safety feature.
A Peugeot 406 Coupe had worse understeer than the various Audis I've had.
Talking about understeer, the worst car that had such from all my ex 122 cars (including some trade in cars) was a Matra Bagheera!Nearly all cars are designed to understeer as a safety feature.
A Peugeot 406 Coupe had worse understeer than the various Audis I've had.
if you wanted to attack some corners fast, the car wants to go almost straight on! or at least the circle line you wanted becomes way bigger... the front has way to low grip.
so if you then knowingly wanted to attack a corner fastly, you had to throw it a bit, it was terrible with no weight at the front.
Thats why some Matra owners made a special made fuel tank in the front, to make the balance/grip levels better.
DickyC said:
Could the Audis Understeer camp clarify whether they mean all Audis or all front wheel drive Audis?
I've had numerous quattros and have always found them to behave well. The one front wheel drive Audi I had I got rid of quickly. Compared to the quattros it was useless.
/like to press on but not a driving god
That’s my exact experience also. I’d never buy an FWD Audi again. But in multiple Quattros and quattros I’ve never found understeer to be a problem. Maybe I’m just not driving them fast enough.I've had numerous quattros and have always found them to behave well. The one front wheel drive Audi I had I got rid of quickly. Compared to the quattros it was useless.
/like to press on but not a driving god
Gassing Station | Classic Cars and Yesterday's Heroes | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff