Classics left to die/rotting pics - Vol 2

Classics left to die/rotting pics - Vol 2

Author
Discussion

bigmowley

1,610 posts

163 months

Shezbo said:
TonyRPH said:
Having owned several Audis (mostly A4s, three of which were Quattros), I never experienced understeer, so I call BS on this one.

I have also owned various BMWs (and do still own one), had various other front wheel drive cars (Skoda vRS) and they handles just the same as the Audis.

IMHO the understeer thing is a big myth.
Mate Audi's understeer!
Yup they do understeer horribly. If yours don’t then man up and go faster it will. Possible exception of some but not all RS products. Even my R8 RWS track car was fairly dire until we sorted it out with a few geometry changes.

Back in the very early 90,s I took a brand new Audi out on a test drive round the Licky Hills in Birmingham. I think it was a B3 80 saloon but I have been to bed since then. I attacked a couple of my favorite bends at reasonable speed and promptly understeered into the kerb in a big way. It severely bent the suspension with one wheel pointing one way and one the other. I limped it back to the dealer and left it in the car park. laugh





Johnspex

4,098 posts

171 months

bigmowley said:
Shezbo said:
TonyRPH said:
Having owned several Audis (mostly A4s, three of which were Quattros), I never experienced understeer, so I call BS on this one.

I have also owned various BMWs (and do still own one), had various other front wheel drive cars (Skoda vRS) and they handles just the same as the Audis.

IMHO the understeer thing is a big myth.
Mate Audi's understeer!
Yup they do understeer horribly. If yours don’t then man up and go faster it will. Possible exception of some but not all RS products. Even my R8 RWS track car was fairly dire until we sorted it out with a few geometry changes.

Back in the very early 90,s I took a brand new Audi out on a test drive round the Licky Hills in Birmingham. I think it was a B3 80 saloon but I have been to bed since then. I attacked a couple of my favorite bends at reasonable speed and promptly understeered into the kerb in a big way. It severely bent the suspension with one wheel pointing one way and one the other. I limped it back to the dealer and left it in the car park. laugh



So, basically you were driving too fast and beyond your capabilities.

Milkyway

6,557 posts

40 months



Edited by Milkyway on Sunday 19th March 16:35

bigmowley

1,610 posts

163 months

Johnspex said:
bigmowley said:
Shezbo said:
TonyRPH said:
Having owned several Audis (mostly A4s, three of which were Quattros), I never experienced understeer, so I call BS on this one.

I have also owned various BMWs (and do still own one), had various other front wheel drive cars (Skoda vRS) and they handles just the same as the Audis.

IMHO the understeer thing is a big myth.
Mate Audi's understeer!
Yup they do understeer horribly. If yours don’t then man up and go faster it will. Possible exception of some but not all RS products. Even my R8 RWS track car was fairly dire until we sorted it out with a few geometry changes.

Back in the very early 90,s I took a brand new Audi out on a test drive round the Licky Hills in Birmingham. I think it was a B3 80 saloon but I have been to bed since then. I attacked a couple of my favorite bends at reasonable speed and promptly understeered into the kerb in a big way. It severely bent the suspension with one wheel pointing one way and one the other. I limped it back to the dealer and left it in the car park. laugh



So, basically you were driving too fast and beyond your capabilities.
Story of my life drivingdrivingdrivinglaugh

Escort3500

10,716 posts

132 months

Shezbo said:
TonyRPH said:
Having owned several Audis (mostly A4s, three of which were Quattros), I never experienced understeer, so I call BS on this one.

I have also owned various BMWs (and do still own one), had various other front wheel drive cars (Skoda vRS) and they handles just the same as the Audis.

IMHO the understeer thing is a big myth.
Mate Audi's understeer!
Nice sweeping generalisation there

Mine doesn’t (RS4)

Shezbo

564 posts

117 months

Escort3500 said:
Nice sweeping generalisation there

Mine doesn’t (RS4)
Asked earlier, to clarify: all front wheel drive Audi's understeer.

Bannock

1,901 posts

17 months

DickyC said:
Bannock said:
I go past that place every day, but in a car, and never thought to stop to photograph it for this forum. There are a couple of dying vehicles I think.

Lots of potential, that house...
Mr Saddo here stopped and walked back. If PH receive a letter of complaint from the Baptist Church parking warden, I'd be grateful if everyone could deny everything.

Yes, there are three or four houses together, all run down. I wondered if a developer is buying them up.



Is this one of the dying vehicles you meant?
Yes, my daughter wants the Beetle to learn to drive in...

TonyRPH

12,279 posts

155 months

Shezbo said:
Escort3500 said:
Nice sweeping generalisation there

Mine doesn’t (RS4)
Asked earlier, to clarify: all front wheel drive Audi's understeer.
To clarify: I've owned several variants of A4, Quattro and front wheel drive only, 4 cyl turbos / non turbos and V6. I didn't notice any difference in understeer characteristics between the two types.

Perhaps I just drive far too responsibly on public roads to invoke this 'terrible understeer'.


Turbobanana

4,717 posts

188 months

TonyRPH said:
Perhaps I just drive far too responsibly on public roads to invoke this 'terrible understeer'.
I think you might be right, Tony. That would explain why Audi haven't sold many cars. Oh, wait...

That said, my old A6 TDI Avant (on new Dunlops when I got it) used to aquaplane at the drop of a hat when it was really wet - think Lake District in August, Biblical sort of wet. But I guess most cars would.

5 In a Row

913 posts

214 months

I borrowed a 2017 A6 TDI Quattro for 4 months when it was 2 years old.
It didn't understeer much.
One special feature it had was a dimwitted 7 speed auto.
Pulling away from a junction seemed to catch it by surprise and it set off slowly at which point you put your foot down a bit harder and then it suddenly took off. When it was greasy it would then oversteer (if leaving a t-junction).
It was also not very economical, rarely getting above 35mpg.

However, it was a good cruiser.

The BMW 320d X-Drive I had at the same time was a far superior device.

Krhuangbin

680 posts

118 months

Not a classic per se, but a semi desirable car once upon a time. Picture is flattering, looks like it’s been resurfaced
from a swamp


Yertis

17,247 posts

253 months

5 In a Row said:
I borrowed a 2017 A6 TDI Quattro for 4 months when it was 2 years old.
It didn't understeer much.
One special feature it had was a dimwitted 7 speed auto.
Pulling away from a junction seemed to catch it by surprise and it set off slowly at which point you put your foot down a bit harder and then it suddenly took off. When it was greasy it would then oversteer (if leaving a t-junction).
It was also not very economical, rarely getting above 35mpg.

However, it was a good cruiser.

The BMW 320d X-Drive I had at the same time was a far superior device.
I’d be interested in an X-Drive if they weren’t so goppingly ugly.

Missy Charm

467 posts

15 months

Krhuangbin said:
Not a classic per se, but a semi desirable car once upon a time. Picture is flattering, looks like it’s been resurfaced
from a swamp

Weird. Passed an MOT with no advisories just under three years ago and the test history prior to that is squeaky clean. Do the engines go bang or something?

uk66fastback

15,894 posts

258 months

‘Semi-desirable’ does not a classic make. Get it off the thread!

5 In a Row

913 posts

214 months

Yesterday (08:31)
quotequote all
Yertis said:
I’d be interested in an X-Drive if they weren’t so goppingly ugly.
Mine was a 2013 so while not exactly beautiful certainly a lot nicer than the current ones.

When that shape of 3 series was released the frontal styling always reminded me of the Mitsubishi Galant VR-4 which is not a compliment to BMW, being a design from the 90s.

Dermot O'Logical

2,015 posts

116 months

Yesterday (09:23)
quotequote all
uk66fastback said:
‘Semi-desirable’ does not a classic make. Get it off the thread!
If we applied that rule, and did away with all of the "Cars which weren't any good even when they were new" the thread would have barely got to the end of Page 1.

tardelli

271 posts

103 months

Yesterday (12:10)
quotequote all
Krhuangbin said:
Not a classic per se, but a semi desirable car once upon a time. Picture is flattering, looks like it’s been resurfaced
from a swamp

Modern Classic per chance?

uk66fastback

15,894 posts

258 months

Yesterday (13:41)
quotequote all
Dermot O'Logical said:
uk66fastback said:
‘Semi-desirable’ does not a classic make. Get it off the thread!
If we applied that rule, and did away with all of the "Cars which weren't any good even when they were new" the thread would have barely got to the end of Page 1.
I never said it wasn’t any good. It’s not a classic (yet).

MadDad

3,826 posts

248 months

Yesterday (20:49)
quotequote all
Missy Charm said:
Krhuangbin said:
Not a classic per se, but a semi desirable car once upon a time. Picture is flattering, looks like it’s been resurfaced
from a swamp

Weird. Passed an MOT with no advisories just under three years ago and the test history prior to that is squeaky clean. Do the engines go bang or something?
Timing chains wear/stretch, rare but it happens - replacement is £2.5-£3k, and the DSG models required regular (expensive) oil and filter changes - skimp on them and there is the potential for a very expensive gearbox repair - as my brother in law found out.

They're relatively cheap to buy (for what they are) but expensive to run so it's possible that one belongs to someone who could afford the forecourt price but not the ongoing running costs?

NorthernSky

885 posts

104 months





Any idea what this could be/once was?