Classics left to die/rotting pics - Vol 2
Discussion
finlo said:
Yertis said:
Early ones were all LHD weren't they?Doofus said:
finlo said:
Yes. They were also flat-fronted, which that one isn't.Doofus said:
Yes. They were also flat-fronted, which that one isn't.
That means nothing - changing from flat to slopey takes about half an hour and got done alot to early cars to make them look like the later ones*. See also replacing the rear light clusters and boot strip with smoked items, and fitting 8” Ronals. Flat front up to my84- Guilty as charged and I still have the flats and the coloured lights from my ‘84 in the garage.
Isimmo said:
GeneralBanter said:
DarrenO'D' said:
That one is also RHD wiper pattern so not as early as the y plate would suggest ? A lack of windscreen will have done no favours to that car, I wonder where it is ?
Ebayuk66fastback said:
Too young to be a classic? Twenty years old … and usually these behemoths wouldn’t even register with me but this one looked especially unloved.
210,000 miles on the clock. Not on SORN either.
6 June 2017
FAIL
Reason(s) for failure
Brake fluid warning lamp illuminated (3.6.G.2)
Supplementary Restraint System warning lamp indicates a fault (5.4.2)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Advisory notice item(s)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
under trays fitted
Gassing Station | Classic Cars and Yesterday's Heroes | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff