Classics left to die/rotting pics - Vol 2
Discussion
The Mad Monk said:
dandare said:
It's probably not doing much harm on the side of the road, he's not driving it, so morally, I don't really consider him a lawbreaker.
Is one of your many hobbies pointing out, and getting angry about petty lawbreakers?
I didn't realise that we could choose what is and what isn't lawbreaking? Is one of your many hobbies pointing out, and getting angry about petty lawbreakers?
So if it's near the side of the road that's ok, is it?
What about if he drives it, but only a little bit, and keeps his fingers crossed while he is on the road, but not really?
Following the law unquestioningly can be dangerous for a society and a person. We've seen what can happen in the past when people simply follow (bad) laws, without thinking about them.
If he drove the car without insurance, I would find that wrong. It would also happen to be illegal, but I don't think that is important. What matters in that case are the potential consequences of having an accident when uninsured.
Found this car under a log pile in a barn. It hasn't moved in at least 25 years, apparently. Any guesses as to what it is?
[url]
|https://thumbsnap.com/DFJWxL3A[/url]
Mr lestat said:
dandare said:
Mr lestat said:
dandare said:
So it's your job?
Spend more time catching real criminals, is my suggestion.
It’s not my job at all Spend more time catching real criminals, is my suggestion.
dandare said:
Correct. It's a pity to leave it there. I suppose they aren't worth much.
Most classics are worth a couple of grand or more these days.https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/275224794653
dandare said:
Mr lestat said:
dandare said:
Mr lestat said:
dandare said:
So it's your job?
Spend more time catching real criminals, is my suggestion.
It’s not my job at all Spend more time catching real criminals, is my suggestion.
You don’t see (m)any Simcas on the road but that’s probably because this bloke owns them all …
CWK 440T was last taxed in 1995.
Over the other side of the barn were these others. Is that an Escort van? Had to snap them blind over a wall …
WRW 906S was last taxed in 2000 …
CWK 440T was last taxed in 1995.
Over the other side of the barn were these others. Is that an Escort van? Had to snap them blind over a wall …
WRW 906S was last taxed in 2000 …
Edited by uk66fastback on Tuesday 24th May 00:41
uk66fastback said:
You don’t see (m)any Simcas on the road but that’s probably because this bloke owns them all …
CWK 440T was last taxed in 1995.
Over the other side of the barn were these others. Is that an Escort van? Had to snap them blind over a wall …
WRW 906S was last taxed in 2000 …
My first car was a Simca 1000 GLS. OLX 582L. Long gone now as it was written off by a hit and run driver. Brilliant little cars and rarely seen - except here of course. CWK 440T was last taxed in 1995.
Over the other side of the barn were these others. Is that an Escort van? Had to snap them blind over a wall …
WRW 906S was last taxed in 2000 …
Edited by uk66fastback on Tuesday 24th May 00:41
keeef said:
dandare said:
Correct. It's a pity to leave it there. I suppose they aren't worth much.
Most classics are worth a couple of grand or more these days.https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/275224794653
They have a good motorsport history, and being based on the A-series/Morris Minor drivetrain (I think), they are pretty tunable and reliable.
The front wings on this one look like colanders, but the rest looks really solid. No sign of rust on the doors, and it has a split rear hatch. I couldn't get down to the sills to check them.
dandare said:
The Mad Monk said:
dandare said:
It's probably not doing much harm on the side of the road, he's not driving it, so morally, I don't really consider him a lawbreaker.
Is one of your many hobbies pointing out, and getting angry about petty lawbreakers?
I didn't realise that we could choose what is and what isn't lawbreaking? Is one of your many hobbies pointing out, and getting angry about petty lawbreakers?
So if it's near the side of the road that's ok, is it?
What about if he drives it, but only a little bit, and keeps his fingers crossed while he is on the road, but not really?
Following the law unquestioningly can be dangerous for a society and a person. We've seen what can happen in the past when people simply follow (bad) laws, without thinking about them.
If he drove the car without insurance, I would find that wrong. It would also happen to be illegal, but I don't think that is important. What matters in that case are the potential consequences of having an accident when uninsured.
Laws pertain to people causing harm to others and are based on morals and ethics, while legal matters are simply about raising money for the private corporation known as HM Government and its spinoffs. However the government also call their rules laws, to deliberately confuse people. So leaving an automobile at the side of the road is not lawbreaking, in the true sense of the word.
People are also purposely misidentified as corporations, which as subsidiaries of the government, then come under their control.
I really wish I'd been as interested in the history and application of law from an early age as I was in classic cars, I'd have saved a huge amount of money. Still I'm making up for lost time now.
uk66fastback said:
You don’t see (m)any Simcas on the road but that’s probably because this bloke owns them all …
CWK 440T was last taxed in 1995.
Over the other side of the barn were these others. Is that an Escort van? Had to snap them blind over a wall …
WRW 906S was last taxed in 2000 …
Oooft, now I would like to have a rear engined Simca some day. Good to see these presumably dry and relatively safe from deterioration.CWK 440T was last taxed in 1995.
Over the other side of the barn were these others. Is that an Escort van? Had to snap them blind over a wall …
WRW 906S was last taxed in 2000 …
Edited by uk66fastback on Tuesday 24th May 00:41
Gassing Station | Classic Cars and Yesterday's Heroes | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff