Why the obsession with originality of classics?

Why the obsession with originality of classics?

Author
Discussion

Equus

16,980 posts

102 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
//j17 said:
Listed status for a building is generally limited to the facade
You think?



a8hex

5,830 posts

224 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Equus said:
//j17 said:
Listed status for a building is generally limited to the facade
You think?
Generally but not always. A great example of just how obsessive they can get about things was shown on the Grand Designs program on Channel 4 where a couple wanted to rescue a castle in Yorkshire that was in danger of falling down.

http://www.channel4.com/programmes/grand-designs/o...

but they come across lots of cases of people wanting to modify listed buildings and having to jump through a whole load of hoops.
Interestingly for our discussion they are often forced to go completely non original. The powers that be often it to be very obvious which bits are new and which bits are original.

Shezbo

600 posts

131 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
lowdrag said:
Bearing under the strain of the contentiousness of one poster once again, here is a very modified E-type. Obviously, this is abhorrent and should not be allowed, but on the other hand it is the BBC Modsports champion from the 1970s driven and owned by my dear departed friend John Burbidge.



ETA With thanks to Paul Skilleter for the use of his photo.
Struggling to see, how helps your argument that "modding" is OK?



Equus

16,980 posts

102 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
a8hex said:
Generally but not always.
Not even generally

AMG Merc

11,954 posts

254 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Everything original for me - or as near as I can get it. Not that you'd care if yours is a "forvever keeper" but It really shows, for example, in the used Ferrari market. Modifications are frowned on and are usually corrected at some future point.

CharlesdeGaulle

26,427 posts

181 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Good to see that the pedantry the OP was getting at is alive and well. What does this thread say about classic fans?

Thankfully, as with cars, this thread seems largely to be populated by mainly sensible sorts of chaps, with the oldd single-issue fanatic thrown in to make the rest of us look almost sane.

AMG Merc

11,954 posts

254 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
CharlesdeGaulle said:
Good to see that the pedantry the OP was getting at is alive and well. What does this thread say about classic fans?

Thankfully, as with cars, this thread seems largely to be populated by mainly sensible sorts of chaps, with the oldd single-issue fanatic thrown in to make the rest of us look almost sane.
You know, I never could understand the French laugh

lowdrag

12,917 posts

214 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Shezbo said:
Struggling to see, how helps your argument that "modding" is OK?
In pointing out that we all have different opinions and that none of us are right. I have a mildly modified E-type for modern use and a replica XKSS. Strangely, the replica is worth more than the original. That doesn't bother me, but I have judged concours and there we get serious. The "restomod" movement, coming from America is growing apace, with people of means having an old car modified to drive today, with aircon, power steering ABS, bluetooth, 1,000 watt amps and whatever else they want to throw their money at. One can go through all shades of grey between white and black. No one is wrong, and no one is right. You pays your money and takes your choice.

GoodOlBoy

542 posts

104 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
lowdrag said:
In pointing out that we all have different opinions and that none of us are right. I have a mildly modified E-type for modern use and a replica XKSS. Strangely, the replica is worth more than the original. That doesn't bother me, but I have judged concours and there we get serious. The "restomod" movement, coming from America is growing apace, with people of means having an old car modified to drive today, with aircon, power steering ABS, bluetooth, 1,000 watt amps and whatever else they want to throw their money at. One can go through all shades of grey between white and black. No one is wrong, and no one is right. You pays your money and takes your choice.
+1


CharlesdeGaulle

26,427 posts

181 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
AMG Merc said:
You know, I never could understand the French laugh
Understand, or stand?

GOG440

9,247 posts

191 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all



Stands well back while all the polishers heads explode.

And to be honest my first reaction was a proper WTF have they done to that e-type. But if you go looking for the story the car was a wreck, it went to the workshop in 2 pieces in the back of a pickup truck, no engine, no interior or running gear and there wasnt a hope of it being restored.

InitialDave

11,977 posts

120 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
GOG440 said:



Stands well back while all the polishers heads explode.

And to be honest my first reaction was a proper WTF have they done to that e-type. But if you go looking for the story the car was a wreck, it went to the workshop in 2 pieces in the back of a pickup truck, no engine, no interior or running gear and there wasnt a hope of it being restored.
Mmm. It's not quite to my taste with the "stance-ness" of it, but I do broadly like it.

GOG440

9,247 posts

191 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
InitialDave said:
Mmm. It's not quite to my taste with the "stance-ness" of it, but I do broadly like it.
It was built for drifting, has a toyota 1jz , bmw transmission etc
It has been built to a very high standard but IMO it is no longer an etype, just a special with an etype esq body on it

GOG440

9,247 posts

191 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Or how about this?


Owned for a very long time by a (sadly deceased) friend of mine, He fitted the wide arches to it over 40years ago so he could get wider tyres under it for hillclimbing, and then sold a lot of sets of them to other competitors. It was already modified by BRM when it was new
Here is another picture of it with Barrie Williams (it must have been taken before he broke it)

InitialDave

11,977 posts

120 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
GOG440 said:
It was built for drifting, has a toyota 1jz , bmw transmission etc
It has been built to a very high standard but IMO it is no longer an etype, just a special with an etype esq body on it
Yeah, I remember when it was posted previously.

Still don't like the stance-ness of it.

Equus

16,980 posts

102 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
GOG440 said:
Or how about this?
Elans remain competitive cars in their own right, in hillclimbing (ie. without needing to run in any form of 'historic' class.

Modifications to maintain a front line competition career are just fine, by me. smile

CharlesdeGaulle

26,427 posts

181 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
Equus said:
Modifications to maintain a front line competition career are just fine, by me. smile
So how do you equate that with the regulation-wielding Stasi on your 'listed' scheme that you were advocating earlier then?

RichB

51,712 posts

285 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
GoodOlBoy said:
lowdrag said:
In pointing out that we all have different opinions and that none of us are right. I have a mildly modified E-type for modern use and a replica XKSS. Strangely, the replica is worth more than the original. That doesn't bother me, but I have judged concours and there we get serious. The "restomod" movement, coming from America is growing apace, with people of means having an old car modified to drive today, with aircon, power steering ABS, bluetooth, 1,000 watt amps and whatever else they want to throw their money at. One can go through all shades of grey between white and black. No one is wrong, and no one is right. You pays your money and takes your choice.
+1
Couldn't agree more. The people calling others rivet counters, polishers and deriding beautiful cars as garage queens says as much about their own narrow mindedness as the the people complaining about a splitter on a BIg Healey or wide arches on an E-Type. There's no right or wrong just personal taste, but for heaven's sake don't try to make out that those who enjoy maintaining the pedigree of an old car are in any way more weird than people who like to slam an' stance a Rolls Royce. biggrin

Equus

16,980 posts

102 months

Friday 23rd June 2017
quotequote all
CharlesdeGaulle said:
So how do you equate that with the regulation-wielding Stasi on your 'listed' scheme that you were advocating earlier then?
Your 'regulation wielding Stasi', not mine. I work with Conservation Officers on a regular basis. smile


AW111

9,674 posts

134 months

Saturday 24th June 2017
quotequote all
An additional factor is that a lot of older cars have already been modified / messed with by previous owners.
This is probably more so at the "minor classic" end of the market.
eg My 1986 mk1a MR2 (first Japanese mid-engined car smile) came with :
Lowered suspension (replaced but with aftermarket parts).
Bean-tin exhaust (replaced but aftermarket)
A mk1b interior.
Some mk1b exterior parts
etc.

It would cost a lot, and take a lot of time to return it to stock. If that's what you want, track down an unmodified original and restore that, and I'll be more than happy to admire it.