XK120 banger racing!

Author
Discussion

a8hex

5,830 posts

224 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
Matt Cup said:
Very nice, what was the difference in power between the s and non s?
For the XK150 the nominal figures were
3.4SE 210BHP
3.8SE 220BHP
3.4S 250BHP
3.8S 265BHP

In theory there was also a non SE version with only 180 fictional horses worth of power, but there is no record of one ever having be made and considerable doubt as to whether the factory ever got as far as agree the full spec for them.

The SE gets the "B" head and a pair of HD6 carbs, while the S gets the straight port head fed by a triplet of HD8 carbs. The 3.8S engine went on to become the engine in the early E-Types but with different inlet manifolds.

Andy 308GTB

2,926 posts

222 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
a8hex said:
Matt Cup said:
Very nice, what was the difference in power between the s and non s?
For the XK150 the nominal figures were
3.4SE 210BHP
3.8SE 220BHP
3.4S 250BHP
3.8S 265BHP

In theory there was also a non SE version with only 180 fictional horses worth of power, but there is no record of one ever having be made and considerable doubt as to whether the factory ever got as far as agree the full spec for them.

The SE gets the "B" head and a pair of HD6 carbs, while the S gets the straight port head fed by a triplet of HD8 carbs. The 3.8S engine went on to become the engine in the early E-Types but with different inlet manifolds.
This is proper Pistonheads!
And all the better for it.

a8hex

5,830 posts

224 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
Andy 308GTB said:
This is proper Pistonheads!
And all the better for it.
beer Na' that's proper anoraking drink

Matt Cup

3,163 posts

105 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
Andy 308GTB said:
a8hex said:
Matt Cup said:
Very nice, what was the difference in power between the s and non s?
For the XK150 the nominal figures were
3.4SE 210BHP
3.8SE 220BHP
3.4S 250BHP
3.8S 265BHP

In theory there was also a non SE version with only 180 fictional horses worth of power, but there is no record of one ever having be made and considerable doubt as to whether the factory ever got as far as agree the full spec for them.

The SE gets the "B" head and a pair of HD6 carbs, while the S gets the straight port head fed by a triplet of HD8 carbs. The 3.8S engine went on to become the engine in the early E-Types but with different inlet manifolds.
This is proper Pistonheads!
And all the better for it.
Agreed!

Thanks for the info a8hex thumbup

Mikebentley

6,124 posts

141 months

Friday 13th September 2019
quotequote all
I love this thread but can’t they change the name to XK150.
It’s like this fake news I keep hearing about.

Mr Tidy

22,421 posts

128 months

Saturday 14th September 2019
quotequote all
Or maybe they can shed some light on Jaguar bhp claims of that era, as they are a work of fiction in the world as we know it now!

a8hex

5,830 posts

224 months

Sunday 15th September 2019
quotequote all
a8hex said:
with only 180 fictional horses worth of power.
Mr Tidy said:
Or maybe they can shed some light on Jaguar bhp claims of that era, as they are a work of fiction in the world as we know it now!
Yes the fictional horses that Jaguar were talking about back then were different fictional horses to those we talk about now. I think Jaguar switched to quoting DIN fictional horses with the SeriesIII XJ with its larger valves and injection system and dropped their claim to somewhere in the 190s range IIRC for what would have been the most powerful version of the XK engine they sold until the modern recreations. These days it isn't too hard to extract the sort of numbers Jaguar were claiming back in the day, but on modern dyno's fictional horses.

shalmaneser

5,936 posts

196 months

Monday 16th September 2019
quotequote all
Wow what a journey! A great thread!

XKman

53 posts

150 months

Monday 1st June 2020
quotequote all
Hi all, sorry it has been a while. Unfortunately I was locked down half an hour away from my worshop, so prigress has not been as fast as I had hoped. Hiwever, getting there. Just the distributor, HT leads, coil and a few water pipes to fit and then we can start the engine!

Escort3500

11,919 posts

146 months

Monday 1st June 2020
quotequote all
XKman said:
Hi all, sorry it has been a while. Unfortunately I was locked down half an hour away from my worshop, so prigress has not been as fast as I had hoped. Hiwever, getting there. Just the distributor, HT leads, coil and a few water pipes to fit and then we can start the engine!
Great to see this thread resurrected. Looking forward to the fire up smile

a8hex

5,830 posts

224 months

Monday 1st June 2020
quotequote all
XKman said:
Hi all, sorry it has been a while. Unfortunately I was locked down half an hour away from my worshop, so prigress has not been as fast as I had hoped. Hiwever, getting there. Just the distributor, HT leads, coil and a few water pipes to fit and then we can start the engine!
Great to hear you're making progress, I bet you can hardly wait to be able to get her running again.
I know I really miss my XK150 cry

Mr Tidy

22,421 posts

128 months

Monday 1st June 2020
quotequote all
XKman said:
Hi all, sorry it has been a while. Unfortunately I was locked down half an hour away from my worshop, so prigress has not been as fast as I had hoped. Hiwever, getting there. Just the distributor, HT leads, coil and a few water pipes to fit and then we can start the engine!
The timeline isn't a problem!

I'm just glad to read of progress like this, and looking forward to the next instalment. thumbup

XKman

53 posts

150 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2020
quotequote all
Sorry, meant to upload latest photo last night but file was too big.

uk66fastback

16,572 posts

272 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2020
quotequote all
Wow!

lukeharding

2,948 posts

90 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2020
quotequote all
That is looking absolutely stunning yes

Escort3500

11,919 posts

146 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2020
quotequote all
Huge credit to you for bringing it back from the brink. Any more pics?

Matt Cup

3,163 posts

105 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2020
quotequote all
Was that the original colour it came in? I must say it looks absolutely sublime!

CDP

7,461 posts

255 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2020
quotequote all
Matt Cup said:
Was that the original colour it came in? I must say it looks absolutely sublime!
I'm not sure originality is terribly important on that car but it looks stunning.

Matt Cup

3,163 posts

105 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2020
quotequote all
CDP said:
Matt Cup said:
Was that the original colour it came in? I must say it looks absolutely sublime!
I'm not sure originality is terribly important on that car but it looks stunning.
Granted, was just curious if that was a factory colour that’s all.

singlecoil

33,698 posts

247 months

Tuesday 2nd June 2020
quotequote all
Matt Cup said:
CDP said:
Matt Cup said:
Was that the original colour it came in? I must say it looks absolutely sublime!
I'm not sure originality is terribly important on that car but it looks stunning.
Granted, was just curious if that was a factory colour that’s all.
I don't think I've ever seen a Jaguar from that era in that colour.