Badminton Raquets

Author
Discussion

scot-corsa

Original Poster:

5,620 posts

216 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
I don't know if there are any players here, but I'll give it a shot anyway. I knackered the strings on my raquet tonight and if its too expensive to replace them I'll get a new one.

I usually get Carlton, but I fancy a change. Any advice?

JonRB

74,623 posts

273 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
I probably haven't played badminton in over 15 years, but when I did play I used to favour Yonex.

boRED S2upid

19,717 posts

241 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Bet theres a few "players" on this site.


Not Badmington player (thought that was for the ladies) but I break a few strings in playing squash and tennis, not expensive at all to get the bats restrung.

scot-corsa

Original Poster:

5,620 posts

216 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
By the way, there are a few brands I don't like - Parker & Wilson.

Ace-T

7,699 posts

256 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
...tennish...but I don't have a racquet?

tumbleweed

Coat on etc

Ace-T

scot-corsa

Original Poster:

5,620 posts

216 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all

JonRB

74,623 posts

273 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
boRED S2upid said:
Not Badmington player (thought that was for the ladies)

Played properly, Badminton is a bloody fast game that is second only to Squash for energy burned per hour.

It's also less "thrusting executive" (ie. less wanky) than Squash. evil

scot-corsa

Original Poster:

5,620 posts

216 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
JonRB said:
boRED S2upid said:
Not Badmington player (thought that was for the ladies)

Played properly, Badminton is a bloody fast game that is second only to Squash for energy burned per hour.

It's also less "thrusting executive" (ie. less wanky) than Squash. evil



It really does require a lot of concentration, but it doesn't have the same pain factor as squash or tennis

boRED S2upid

19,717 posts

241 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
JonRB said:
boRED S2upid said:
Not Badmington player (thought that was for the ladies)

Played properly, Badminton is a bloody fast game that is second only to Squash for energy burned per hour.

It's also less "thrusting executive" (ie. less wanky) than Squash. evil



I thought doing the dirty deed was number 1 for energy burned per hour, squash 2 that would put Badmingon at 3...

scot-corsa

Original Poster:

5,620 posts

216 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
boRED S2upid said:
JonRB said:
boRED S2upid said:
Not Badmington player (thought that was for the ladies)

Played properly, Badminton is a bloody fast game that is second only to Squash for energy burned per hour.

It's also less "thrusting executive" (ie. less wanky) than Squash. evil



I thought doing the dirty deed was number 1 for energy burned per hour, squash 2 that would put Badmingon at 3...



Im guessing uve never played?

boRED S2upid

19,717 posts

241 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
scot-corsa said:
boRED S2upid said:
JonRB said:
boRED S2upid said:
Not Badmington player (thought that was for the ladies)

Played properly, Badminton is a bloody fast game that is second only to Squash for energy burned per hour.

It's also less "thrusting executive" (ie. less wanky) than Squash. evil



I thought doing the dirty deed was number 1 for energy burned per hour, squash 2 that would put Badmingon at 3...



Im guessing uve never played?



Badmington? no.

Although as im getting older the old Squash injuries are staring to take their toll, you can only play squash for so long its a tough old sport, maybe I should have a game of shuttle cock.

scot-corsa

Original Poster:

5,620 posts

216 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
boRED S2upid said:
scot-corsa said:
boRED S2upid said:
JonRB said:
boRED S2upid said:
Not Badmington player (thought that was for the ladies)

Played properly, Badminton is a bloody fast game that is second only to Squash for energy burned per hour.

It's also less "thrusting executive" (ie. less wanky) than Squash. evil



I thought doing the dirty deed was number 1 for energy burned per hour, squash 2 that would put Badmingon at 3...



Im guessing uve never played?



Badmington? no.

Although as im getting older the old Squash injuries are staring to take their toll, you can only play squash for so long its a tough old sport, maybe I should have a game of shuttle cock.



Its really an unfortunate name for a thing to hit, it makes you squirm the first few times you hit it

simpo two

85,578 posts

266 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
JonRB said:
It's also less "thrusting executive" (ie. less wanky) than Squash. evil


And you don't have to play it in a perspex box.



PS It's BADMIN(no G here)TON. No bloody 'ings' please



Edited by simpo two on Thursday 19th April 23:30

scot-corsa

Original Poster:

5,620 posts

216 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
simpo two said:
JonRB said:
It's also less "thrusting executive" (ie. less wanky) than Squash. evil


And you don't have to play it in a perspex box.



PS It's BADMIN(no G here)TON. No bloody 'ings' please



Edited by simpo two on Thursday 19th April 23:30



Do you play, what raquet would you recommend. The threads seems to have wandered a little.

the_sheriff

464 posts

217 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Try these guys out, I've bought squash raquets from them in the past, very good service and prices.

http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Racketworld_

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

226 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Carlton or Slazenger.

No other raquet manufacturers really embraced badminton afair. They all just completed their range of raquets across the tennis/squash/badminton triumverate.

(although, to be fair, it's been about 10 years since i played)

Edited by Famous Graham on Thursday 19th April 23:49

scot-corsa

Original Poster:

5,620 posts

216 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
the_sheriff said:
Try these guys out, I've bought squash raquets from them in the past, very good service and prices.

http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Racketworld_


Cheers mate, good selection, may go there if i need a new one

scot-corsa

Original Poster:

5,620 posts

216 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
Famous Graham said:
Carlton or Slazenger.

No other raquet manufacturers really embraced badminton afair. They all just completed their range of raquets across the tennis/squash/badminton triumverate.

(although, to be fair, it's been about 10 years since i played)

Edited by Famous Graham on Thursday 19th April 23:49


Ive been carlton faithufll for about 9 years now, so that would be my automatic preferance.

jagdpanther

19,633 posts

220 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
I used to play Badmington at school and thoroughly enjoyed it, but never stayed with it over the years

hugh_

3,549 posts

242 months

Thursday 19th April 2007
quotequote all
I play a fair amount. I suppose it depends what sort of raquet you want (head light, long shaft etc.).

Personally I favour Yonex and have got a couple of the Muscle Power (MP) series, namely the MP44 and MP66, both and headlight and I enjoy using both. In general you get what you pay for, though having said that though if you can cope with the slightly strange shape of a Prince then you can get a high end racquet for not much money as they are typically out of favour at the moment.

Ideally I'd see if it's possible to try out some other players racquets on club nights to find out what you like, but if you've just broken yours then that isn't really do-able.