TVR Power 5.0 litre

TVR Power 5.0 litre

Author
Discussion

YRRunner

1,652 posts

216 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
shep1001 said:
So there will be 10 lucky (exclusive) owners of the 5 litre beast then........
Explain please? Chomping on the bit here!!!

shep1001

4,600 posts

189 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
YRRunner said:
Explain please? Chomping on the bit here!!!
Have a look on Powers' facebook page. Off to Italy now so no time to explain but it's exactly as I said, Dom is going to make a limited run of ten 5.0 litre S6 engines.

natben

2,743 posts

231 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
I would love to have one of Powers 5.0L speed six engines in my Cerbera it will be an awsome engine but I can't afford it I'm afraid, good luck to the 10 that can you will have one hell of a car once installed.

Also good to see power continuing to develop there own engine at there own cost. Unlike other garages I could mention that use customers engines at the customers cost to develop there product ideas sometimes with disastrous consequences for the customer in time and money.

Well done Dom.

Edited by natben on Wednesday 24th July 10:46

WolfyJones

945 posts

132 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
Will the gearbox etc have to be upgraded to handle that torque/power?

Standard Sag
Revs lb ft bhp
3 240 140
4 260 200
5 285 270
6 290 330

5 litre
3 335 200
4 370 280
5 385 365
6 360 405

Its a massive jump in performance from standard.

fatbutt

2,656 posts

264 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
WolfyJones said:
Will the gearbox etc have to be upgraded to handle that torque/power?

Standard Sag
Revs lb ft bhp
3 240 140
4 260 200
5 285 270
6 290 330

5 litre
3 335 200
4 370 280
5 385 365
6 360 405

Its a massive jump in performance from standard.
Not really. A standard Sagaris is 380HP from 4 ltrs, i.e. 95BHP/ Ltr (don't know where you got 330BHP from). The 5ltr is 405BHP from 5 ltrs, i.e. 81BHP/ Ltr. There are a lot of engines out there that do 100BHP/ Ltr so truthfully, based on that table you've quoted, its not that great.

And 405 BHP isn't much to be fair. Crate chevy's start at 420 BHP. My chevy truck had 600 BHP. You can buy a mustang from Ford with 662BHP straight from the showroom.

All power to those wanting a 5ltr S6 in their TVR, its a good engine (once up to temp) and make a great noise. But its not 'all that'.

WolfyJones

945 posts

132 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
fatbutt said:
Not really. A standard Sagaris is 380HP from 4 ltrs, i.e. 95BHP/ Ltr (don't know where you got 330BHP from). The 5ltr is 405BHP from 5 ltrs, i.e. 81BHP/ Ltr. There are a lot of engines out there that do 100BHP/ Ltr so truthfully, based on that table you've quoted, its not that great.

And 405 BHP isn't much to be fair. Crate chevy's start at 420 BHP. My chevy truck had 600 BHP. You can buy a mustang from Ford with 662BHP straight from the showroom.

All power to those wanting a 5ltr S6 in their TVR, its a good engine (once up to temp) and make a great noise. But its not 'all that'.
Look again at what I have posted, I have only gone to 6k, its low down torque that breaks stuff, the 4.5 ss that was in the racing Sag destroyed gearboxes and it didn't have the torque of a 5 litre, across the rev range and up to 6k it produces around 100 lb ft more than a standard Sag.

Jhonno

5,774 posts

141 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
fatbutt said:
Not really. A standard Sagaris is 380HP from 4 ltrs, i.e. 95BHP/ Ltr (don't know where you got 330BHP from). The 5ltr is 405BHP from 5 ltrs, i.e. 81BHP/ Ltr. There are a lot of engines out there that do 100BHP/ Ltr so truthfully, based on that table you've quoted, its not that great.
That's quite a drop in bhp/L!

fatbutt

2,656 posts

264 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
WolfyJones said:
Look again at what I have posted, I have only gone to 6k, its low down torque that breaks stuff, the 4.5 ss that was in the racing Sag destroyed gearboxes and it didn't have the torque of a 5 litre, across the rev range and up to 6k it produces around 100 lb ft more than a standard Sag.
Fair enough but its still nothing spectacular from a 5ltr engine.

WolfyJones

945 posts

132 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
fatbutt said:
WolfyJones said:
Look again at what I have posted, I have only gone to 6k, its low down torque that breaks stuff, the 4.5 ss that was in the racing Sag destroyed gearboxes and it didn't have the torque of a 5 litre, across the rev range and up to 6k it produces around 100 lb ft more than a standard Sag.
Fair enough but its still nothing spectacular from a 5ltr engine.
Well it murders my 5 litre 500 engine, lol

My 500

Revs lb ft bhp
3 325 180
4 334 250
5 310 291
6 270 290

S6 5 litre
3 335 200
4 370 280
5 385 365
6 360 405
And hopefully more to come up to 7k

Standard Sag up to 7k
3 240 140
4 260 200
5 285 270
6 290 330
7 280 370

Edited by WolfyJones on Wednesday 24th July 15:15

EvoOlli

605 posts

163 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
The one is talking about power @wheels, the other one is talking about power @flywheel....

WolfyJones

945 posts

132 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
EvoOlli said:
The one is talking about power @wheels, the other one is talking about power @flywheel....
Both work out the same, Tvr power wheels figures and Srr fly figures.

Edited by WolfyJones on Wednesday 24th July 15:21

EvoOlli

605 posts

163 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
Mhhh...fatbutt compared the (standard) 380hp @flywheel with the (5Ltr) 405hp @wheels...

Tvr Power

1,076 posts

206 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
fatbutt said:
WolfyJones said:
Look again at what I have posted, I have only gone to 6k, its low down torque that breaks stuff, the 4.5 ss that was in the racing Sag destroyed gearboxes and it didn't have the torque of a 5 litre, across the rev range and up to 6k it produces around 100 lb ft more than a standard Sag.
Fair enough but its still nothing spectacular from a 5ltr engine.
Fatbutt come to Tvr Power and ill take you out in the 5ltr then tell me she's not spectacular, as for the 4.5 ss breaking gearboxes thats simply down to the development box being shyte


Dom

WolfyJones

945 posts

132 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
Didn't it break a few standard boxes as well, wink

Looking forward to seeing the final figures, you had it back on your RR yet?

And how much is it going to cost?

Edited by WolfyJones on Wednesday 24th July 16:48

coetzeeh

2,648 posts

236 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
Make sure you are wearing brown underwear Fatts. smile

fatbutt

2,656 posts

264 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
EvoOlli said:
Mhhh...fatbutt compared the (standard) 380hp @flywheel with the (5Ltr) 405hp @wheels...
Fatbutt compared the figures that were quoted in a previous post. Flywheel figures or wheel figures weren't mentioned.

fatbutt

2,656 posts

264 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
Tvr Power said:
Fatbutt come to Tvr Power and ill take you out in the 5ltr then tell me she's not spectacular, as for the 4.5 ss breaking gearboxes thats simply down to the development box being shyte


Dom
Hi Dom - not wanting to sound insulting of your work, just wanting the fanboi style comments to be a bit more realistic in their appraisal of the figures. I'm sure whatever you have the 5tlr in will go like stink but put it in something heavier then it simply wont. 100BHP/ ltr is pretty much typical for BMW N/A engines isn't it? I'm sure you've worked wonders with the TVR S6 but the engine in isolation, i.e. not in a Tuscan or other 1.1Te car, is not a new specification benchmark.

As for the box, I'm staying out of that discussion. The Tremec 6060 I have in my rod seems pretty happy with 420Hp...

WolfyJones

945 posts

132 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
fatbutt said:
Hi Dom - not wanting to sound insulting of your work, just wanting the fanboi style comments to be a bit more realistic in their appraisal of the figures. I'm sure whatever you have the 5tlr in will go like stink but put it in something heavier then it simply wont. 100BHP/ ltr is pretty much typical for BMW N/A engines isn't it? I'm sure you've worked wonders with the TVR S6 but the engine in isolation, i.e. not in a Tuscan or other 1.1Te car, is not a new specification benchmark.

As for the box, I'm staying out of that discussion. The Tremec 6060 I have in my rod seems pretty happy with 420Hp...
Bloody hell, let the lad finish development before you start having a pop, up to 6k it looks a stonking engine and I,m sure more will come, thou even now its got far more punch than the factory units.

fatbutt

2,656 posts

264 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
WolfyJones said:
Bloody hell, let the lad finish development before you start having a pop, up to 6k it looks a stonking engine and I,m sure more will come, thou even now its got far more punch than the factory units.
Try not publishing figures onto a public forum that show the engine isn't quite as powerful as other units in the same field then big up the numbers like they are somehow extraordinary.

Excessive praise, as you dish out on numerous threads about Dom's work, leads to greater scrutiny and criticism. Like I said, I'm sure TVR Power have done a great job but FFS, tone down the butt kissing for Dom's sake, you come off sounding like a star struck 13 year old.

WolfyJones

945 posts

132 months

Wednesday 24th July 2013
quotequote all
fatbutt said:
Try not publishing figures onto a public forum that show the engine isn't quite as powerful as other units in the same field then big up the numbers like they are somehow extraordinary.

Excessive praise, as you dish out on numerous threads about Dom's work, leads to greater scrutiny and criticism. Like I said, I'm sure TVR Power have done a great job but FFS, tone down the butt kissing for Dom's sake, you come off sounding like a star struck 13 year old.
Lol, very good.
Figures were already published,
Figures are extremely good lower down the rev range where most owners think the S6 is lacking,
What Dom and Winstanley did with the 4.5ss was bloody amazing,

Now if you don't like that bugger off and get back in your hole, smile

Edited by WolfyJones on Wednesday 24th July 19:18