Stability and Skill in Driving (research paper)

Stability and Skill in Driving (research paper)

Author
Discussion

Jungles

Original Poster:

3,587 posts

222 months

Sunday 28th May 2006
quotequote all
This is a quite a recent study (2002) conducted by Griffith University, Australia, regarding the effects of posture and stability in sensory perception, vehicle control, and safe driving. If you can wade through the more technical aspects of the study, some of the discussion may be useful to driving instructors who frequent this board.

www.fmh.utl.pt/aca/stability&skill.pdf

Abstract:

Treffner et al said:
Two experiments addressed the relation between postural stability, perceptual sensitivity, and stability of driving performance. A vehicle was fitted with differential GPS for measuring position and speed, position sensors for measuring brake and accelerator depression, force transducers for measuring door, console and footrest bracing forces, and an accelerometer for measuring the 3D accelerations of the vehicle. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether the initiation of deceleration and the control of braking might be due to sensitivity to the perceptual variable tau, which specifies time-to-contact (TTC), and in particular, whether its first derivative, tau-dot, is used to maintain a constant deceleration profile. Using both untrained experienced drivers (EDs) and trained driving instructors from the Holden Performance Driving Centre (HPDC), results confirmed that, regardless of skill level, tau-dot was maintained at a value close to 0.5 and, as predicted by Lee [Perception 5 (1976) 437], braking was initiated when TTC approximately 5 s. In Experiment 2, we wished to quantify the purported differences in driving behaviour between EDs and HPDC instructors during a variety of everyday manoeuvres. Results indicated that instructors utilised a different cornering trajectory, a different emergency braking strategy, and were able to perform a high-speed swerve and recovery task more effectively than the EDs. In general, the instructors applied greater bracing forces using the door and console compared with EDs. The instructors also applied greater footrest forces during emergency braking than did the EDs. The greater use of bracing by instructor drivers to resist g-forces represents a strategy of active stabilisation that enhances both postural stability, as well as overall stability and consistency of driving performance. Results are discussed with regard to the dynamics of perceptual-motor coordination, and how increased stability might improve sensitivity to relevant perceptual information. We conclude that driver-training programmes that focus on increasing driver stability (as a pre-requisite for increased control) show great promise as a means to improving one's attention during driving, and hence have the potential to dramatically improve road safety in general. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science B.V.


>> Edited by Jungles on Sunday 28th May 12:40

rsvmilly

11,288 posts

242 months

Sunday 28th May 2006
quotequote all
Shows the importance of proper use of the fourth pedal.

GreenV8S

30,223 posts

285 months

Sunday 28th May 2006
quotequote all
A decent supportive seat and harness makes it much easier to control the car in high G situations. I guess this experiment shows that the advanced drivers were better at compensating for the lack of support?

thunderbelmont

2,982 posts

225 months

Wednesday 31st May 2006
quotequote all
Wonder if they'll re-do the tests with a bench seat, and a blonde on the passenger side....


Narvanath

293 posts

224 months

Friday 2nd June 2006
quotequote all
Mmmmm.... interesting that they did just ask.