Paper Ship: Bismarck, HMV, 1:250

Paper Ship: Bismarck, HMV, 1:250

Author
Discussion

lufbramatt

5,345 posts

134 months

Thursday 16th January 2020
quotequote all
The sheer size of this has just dawned on me- one of my colleagues bought a Tamiya 1:350 Yamato last week and that’s massive, this is way bigger!

I can’t begin to fathom how you have he patience to see these builds through!

Turn7

23,609 posts

221 months

Thursday 16th January 2020
quotequote all
Is UHU still the hideous stringy, gets everywhere stuff I remember from my childhood ?

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,163 posts

184 months

Thursday 16th January 2020
quotequote all
lufbramatt said:
The sheer size of this has just dawned on me- one of my colleagues bought a Tamiya 1:350 Yamato last week and that’s massive, this is way bigger!

I can’t begin to fathom how you have he patience to see these builds through!
Yes it’s a bit on the large size - just over 1m. I’ve put an Ikea shelf up to keep it on just for this build.

Someone I know has the Tamiya 1:350 Bismarck, this one is infinitely more detailed. Unfortunately all that detail has to be cut out, folded up and glued together...


Edited by dr_gn on Thursday 16th January 21:56

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,163 posts

184 months

Thursday 16th January 2020
quotequote all
Turn7 said:
Is UHU still the hideous stringy, gets everywhere stuff I remember from my childhood ?
Yes, it’s absolutely hopeless to work with on anything more critical than large bits of model which will never be seen again.

It certainly does the job when used in the right places though.

Squirrelofwoe

3,183 posts

176 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
lufbramatt said:
The sheer size of this has just dawned on me- one of my colleagues bought a Tamiya 1:350 Yamato last week and that’s massive, this is way bigger!

I can’t begin to fathom how you have he patience to see these builds through!
Yes it’s a bit on the large size - just over 1m. I’ve put an Ikea shelf up to keep it on just for this build.

Someone I know has the Tamiya 1:350 Bismarck, this one is infinitely more detailed. Unfortunately all that detail has to be cut out, folded up and glued together...


Edited by dr_gn on Thursday 16th January 21:56
I have got a 1:350 HMS Dreadnought in progress and the brass on that I have to do in stages or else I'd go loopy- I couldn't even contemplate building something like this in paperyikes

I am a patient person, but something like this would break me just cutting out all of the parts... hehe

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,163 posts

184 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Squirrelofwoe said:
dr_gn said:
lufbramatt said:
The sheer size of this has just dawned on me- one of my colleagues bought a Tamiya 1:350 Yamato last week and that’s massive, this is way bigger!

I can’t begin to fathom how you have he patience to see these builds through!
Yes it’s a bit on the large size - just over 1m. I’ve put an Ikea shelf up to keep it on just for this build.

Someone I know has the Tamiya 1:350 Bismarck, this one is infinitely more detailed. Unfortunately all that detail has to be cut out, folded up and glued together...


Edited by dr_gn on Thursday 16th January 21:56
I have got a 1:350 HMS Dreadnought in progress and the brass on that I have to do in stages or else I'd go loopy- I couldn't even contemplate building something like this in paperyikes

I am a patient person, but something like this would break me just cutting out all of the parts... hehe
I've built a few other HMV paper ships rated at 'difficult' or 'very difficult', so I assume this one will be similar complexity, but will take about 3x longer!

Squirrelofwoe

3,183 posts

176 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
I've built a few other HMV paper ships rated at 'difficult' or 'very difficult', so I assume this one will be similar complexity, but will take about 3x longer!
I followed the other builds you did on here, particularly liked the SMS Emden you did- superb job and very much my period of interest thumbup

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 23rd January 2020
quotequote all
https://play.acast.com/s/dansnowshistoryhit/f78365...

There’s a great BBC history hit podcast by Dan Snow about hunting the Bismarck just out, I was listening to this morning that I thought might be good to listen to Dr.

I think it’s the second one in.

His podcasts are pretty good if anyone’s interested.


dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,163 posts

184 months

Thursday 23rd January 2020
quotequote all
El stovey said:
https://play.acast.com/s/dansnowshistoryhit/f78365...

There’s a great BBC history hit podcast by Dan Snow about hunting the Bismarck just out, I was listening to this morning that I thought might be good to listen to Dr.

I think it’s the second one in.

His podcasts are pretty good if anyone’s interested.
Thanks very much - I'll have a listen this weekend.

archie456

422 posts

222 months

Friday 21st February 2020
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
Turn7 said:
Is UHU still the hideous stringy, gets everywhere stuff I remember from my childhood ?
Yes, it’s absolutely hopeless to work with on anything more critical than large bits of model which will never be seen again.

It certainly does the job when used in the right places though.
You can put it in a jar and dilute it a little with acetone or cellulose thinners and the stringiness disappears.

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,163 posts

184 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
archie456 said:
dr_gn said:
Turn7 said:
Is UHU still the hideous stringy, gets everywhere stuff I remember from my childhood ?
Yes, it’s absolutely hopeless to work with on anything more critical than large bits of model which will never be seen again.

It certainly does the job when used in the right places though.
You can put it in a jar and dilute it a little with acetone or cellulose thinners and the stringiness disappears.
Thanks, but won’t that make it more prone to wrinkling the paper or damaging the ink?

ferrisbueller

29,328 posts

227 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
This had dropped off my watchlist for some reason so I've only just caught up on the tragic events of January. Heartened to see another one underway and racing to a finish.

Amazing work, as per.

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,163 posts

184 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
ferrisbueller said:
This had dropped off my watchlist for some reason so I've only just caught up on the tragic events of January. Heartened to see another one underway and racing to a finish.

Amazing work, as per.
Wouldn’t say “racing”!

I looked at it again on Thursday evening, and immediately ran into an unfathomable assembly on the first bit of superstructure...

archie456

422 posts

222 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
archie456 said:
You can put it in a jar and dilute it a little with acetone or cellulose thinners and the stringiness disappears.
Thanks, but won’t that make it more prone to wrinkling the paper or damaging the ink?
Yes it might, I hadn't thought of that as I use it for a different purpose.

I guess a quick test will find out either way.

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,163 posts

184 months

Saturday 22nd February 2020
quotequote all
That prompted me to get on with it today. I’ve 90% figured out the area between the two main superstructure blocks. It’s a complex assembly of faceted plates and cantilevered overhangs that somehow form a roof over the gap, with the catapult off to one side:



Here are some of the parts:



I’ve cut some of the more complicated z-folds out of their original parts - makes alignment easier. Also painted the exposed edges, and used the first bits of laser-cut card: bulkhead stiffeners.

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,163 posts

184 months

Friday 28th February 2020
quotequote all
Here’s a fairly typical problem with tolerance stacks and paper models: the first piece of the superstructure wall needs to fit exactly on its footprint on the deck, butt up to the catapult trough, and match up with a curved piece, which is itself part of an assembly. All need to match precisely with the roof of the superstructure , which is one piece, so can’t easily be adjusted:





Trouble is, the superstructure wall piece is about 1mm too far back, so won’t match the curved piece. This will throw the whole lot out. I’ve glued a wood strip to the back of the wall, and another to the deck. I’m hoping to put some glue on the mating faces and force the wall forward slightly until the glue sets.

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,163 posts

184 months

Saturday 29th February 2020
quotequote all
Assembling the secondary turret recesses with their double skins, radial stiffeners and conical cappings, while still maintaining alignment for the top deck, is a brutal modelling job if you don’t like mis-matched edges...


mcdjl

5,446 posts

195 months

Sunday 1st March 2020
quotequote all
I can safely say that if I was making that, that mismatch would be one of the best joints.

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,163 posts

184 months

Sunday 8th March 2020
quotequote all
I’ve replaced the horizontal tabs of the decks with doubled paper pva’d into their slots. Their absence made deck fitting easier, but the structure lost a bit of stiffness. All back now. Now adding the first superstructure sides, inch-by-inch:





Alignment with the next deck is all over the place (see the door between the metal blocks, and how it’s deck plate is offset), but that’s how it goes with paper models of this complexity...

Also, part numbering can be hit and miss, which can get confusing:



Should be part 65B.

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,163 posts

184 months

Tuesday 10th March 2020
quotequote all
First of the upper decks: Not too bad a fit, but some slight overhangs, especially in the secondary turret circular cut-outs. I cut a template disc with the Olfa circle cutter, and got it to be a perfect fit in the curve:



Then used the female part of the template to mark the underside of the deck, as a trimming guide:



Still fettling to do, but it’ll hopefully be a big improvement: