Brooklands LPT & Turbo R

Author
Discussion

Kickstart

Original Poster:

1,062 posts

238 months

Sunday 30th August 2009
quotequote all
Is there much difference between a Brooklands LPT and a turbo R - drove a friends RT a while back and thought it far too stiff - does the Brooklands have the same suspension ?

cheers

Kickstart

buyer&seller

772 posts

179 months

Monday 31st August 2009
quotequote all
Big difference in engine power. The Brooklands is 300bhp, unless it's a Mulliner 325, and an RT is 400. The RT has stiffer anti roll bars and don't forget LWB, so that'll affect the ride. If it was that bad may be the gas springs at the back need looking at, it shouldn't be that stiff.

Kickstart

Original Poster:

1,062 posts

238 months

Monday 31st August 2009
quotequote all
Thanks for that - I had no idea that the engine power was so different - is there much of a difference with the non RT car eg a 96 Turbo R SWB ? If the interior the same ?

stain

1,051 posts

211 months

Monday 31st August 2009
quotequote all
The 96 R is basically the same as the RT inside, though you may find a few detail changes in the woodwork and leather as specified by the original buyer. Power wise, the R is plenty fast enough for the type of car in question. Agree about the ride. By modern standards it can be a bit crashy, but I wouldn't call it hard. Active ride / dead spring problems are common and very pricey to fix, hence many are left alone.

POORCARDEALER

8,526 posts

242 months

Monday 31st August 2009
quotequote all
The pick for ride quality and performance might be a "SWB" Turbo R from 1996 (ie not a LWB).


Absolute plug but I have one in stock and one arriving friday, drop me a pm for details.

Kickstart

Original Poster:

1,062 posts

238 months

Tuesday 1st September 2009
quotequote all
Go on then tempt me - sent you a PM