General rugby thread

General rugby thread

Author
Discussion

Blackpuddin

16,544 posts

206 months

Tuesday 22nd August 2017
quotequote all
Women's rugby at this level is very watchable. English lassies are outstanding in both technique and temperament. And David Flatman is very listenable as a pundit.

DocJock

8,357 posts

241 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
Women's world cup semis on now. ABs v USA first up... Female Haka is hilarious, sorry.
Yeah, no disrespect intended, but the female haka is ridiculous.

The Mad Monk

10,474 posts

118 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
Watch the All Black winger - Woodman, is I think the name, no. 14. She is electric!

JonChalk

6,469 posts

111 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
I though the England v France semi was a cracker.

I have paid good money to see matches at Twickenham that were way, way worse than that; the infamous defeat to Argentina in 2006, for example.

This tournament deserved a better location and support in its early stages, rather than tucked away on Irish village club grounds.

Flibbiddydibbiddydob

11,669 posts

251 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
DocJock said:
hornetrider said:
Women's world cup semis on now. ABs v USA first up... Female Haka is hilarious, sorry.
Yeah, no disrespect intended, but the female haka is ridiculous.
Yeah, and no disrespect intended by me, but the lasses really can't kick for a toffee, which actually makes for a good game.

The UK/France match was nail biter up until the last 1/4 when France had nothing left (too much reliance on their French No8?).

As a low order (grass roots i.e. U12) coach for my local team the message I am hearing is how can we get more players.

This Women's World Cup has been a brilliant opportunity to watch rugby that isn't owned by Sky TV.

And the rugby has been excellent.

(Just off to watch the Brittish Super Bikes on ITV4).

I'll be back.






hornetrider

Original Poster:

63,161 posts

206 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
I read this and I think premiership rugby can go fk themselves. Pardon my french.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/aug/24/brit...

Who the fk does he think he is? Don't fk with the Lions.

This post brought to you by Speyside's finest.

Kermit power

28,672 posts

214 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
I read this and I think premiership rugby can go fk themselves. Pardon my french.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/aug/24/brit...

Who the fk does he think he is? Don't fk with the Lions.

This post brought to you by Speyside's finest.
Personally, I fully agree with him.

As a result of the Lions being on Sky and on at a fairly anti-social time this time around, I only watched a few minutes of the last test and really didn't miss it.

I know I'm in the minority in that I'd always rather see England play than the Lions, but I certainly don't see the need for more bloody pointless warm up games!

I think it was different when rugby was amateur but in the light of full professionalism and the large amounts of money involved, are you really saying the Premiership shouldn't be protecting their business?

hornetrider

Original Poster:

63,161 posts

206 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
I'm saying their business is enhanced by the Lions and that they should respect the history and tradition of the sport by supporting it.

Kermit power

28,672 posts

214 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
I'm saying their business is enhanced by the Lions and that they should respect the history and tradition of the sport by supporting it.
Should we respect it by removing the professional setups in the individual home nations them, so that the Lions can go back to being the pinnacle of Northern Hemisphere rugby then, rather than just a four yearly less well prepared sideshow?

Having said that, I see nothing in that article to suggest they don't want to support the Lions anyway. Maybe the Lions just need to be a bit less arrogant and start a conversation if they want to remain relevant?

hornetrider

Original Poster:

63,161 posts

206 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
Kermit power said:
Should we respect it by removing the professional setups in the individual home nations
Don't be silly, make sense lad.

DocJock

8,357 posts

241 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
I think they make a perfectly valid point, suggesting that if the Lions want an extra week, then the Home unions should give up one autumn international that year.

XCP

16,927 posts

229 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
Or the premiership teams could just manage without their Lions players for 7 days. The world will not come to an end.

DocJock

8,357 posts

241 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
The recommended 32 match maximum already means that a successful team loses out if their players play the 6N and autumn internationals. 9 matches, leaving 23 for European Cup and Premiership matches

A Lions tour means they lose them for another 4 or 5 matches, all the while paying their salaries and risking losing them to injury.

I am all for The Lions, but they need to remember they are 'borrowing' these players from the clubs. Conversely, the clubs need to acknowledge the halo effect the Lions have on club rugby and the improvement their players will make working with different, top coaches and players for six weeks.

Basically, they all need to put down their egos and have a sensible discussion about it instead of puffing out their chests and posturing.

irocfan

40,530 posts

191 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
DocJock said:
The recommended 32 match maximum already means that a successful team loses out if their players play the 6N and autumn internationals. 9 matches, leaving 23 for European Cup and Premiership matches

A Lions tour means they lose them for another 4 or 5 matches, all the while paying their salaries and risking losing them to injury.

I am all for The Lions, but they need to remember they are 'borrowing' these players from the clubs. Conversely, the clubs need to acknowledge the halo effect the Lions have on club rugby and the improvement their players will make working with different, top coaches and players for six weeks.

Basically, they all need to put down their egos and have a sensible discussion about it instead of puffing out their chests and posturing.
well said chap

hornetrider

Original Poster:

63,161 posts

206 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
DocJock said:
Basically, they all need to put down their egos and have a sensible discussion about it instead of puffing out their chests and posturing.
Agreed. My point is that's not the tone coming from the premiership.

DocJock

8,357 posts

241 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
Sorry. Didn't make it clear that I agree with you.

Kermit power

28,672 posts

214 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
Kermit power said:
Should we respect it by removing the professional setups in the individual home nations
Don't be silly, make sense lad.
But surely if you want the Premiership to bow down and worship at the feet of the Lions, you should want the individual Unions to do likewise?

After all, the unsportsmanlike way that they go around having permanent coaching staff and regular fixtures which mean that at the very least England and Ireland would beat the Lions most of the time is surely disrespectful to the glory that is the Lions?

It could it just be that the Lions are a bit of a pointless anachronism these days?

iwantagta

1,323 posts

146 months

Friday 25th August 2017
quotequote all
I don't get the whole disliking the Lions thing.
Maybe its just me but having something instead of the normal summer tours, something to bridge the 4 year world cup wait, is something to hold onto and cherish.
Bringing together the home nations which, outside of the athletics is pretty rare, & it clearly means a lot to the hosts (financially if nothing else!).

Without some traditions Rugby would be a worse sport. The Baa Baas and the Lions may be an anachronism but I wouldnt want to be without them.

Its a fine line between keeping tradition and keeping up with the times, increasing pressure on player welfare needs to be a strong consideration but, however its achieved, the Lions must go on.

The players also seem to love it, the pinacle of many a career, which is why i dont see it going anywhere. If the players didnt care then it might be a different story.


E24man

6,721 posts

180 months

Saturday 26th August 2017
quotequote all
Anyone else watching New Zealand vs Australia?

iwantagta

1,323 posts

146 months

Saturday 26th August 2017
quotequote all
Watched the last 10 mins. Feel dirty for wanting the Aussies to win. Think they needed to hold out for at the end of the half though.